Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Gibbs just now: President Obama "prefers" a public option

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-18-09 01:35 PM
Original message
Gibbs just now: President Obama "prefers" a public option
They just.dont.get.it.

These weasel words is why they are losing their base.

Fuck the "prefers", how about "DEMANDS" or "will only sign a bill that includes"?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-18-09 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. Because maybe he prefers rather than demands?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorax7844 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-18-09 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
2. Exactly fuck that prefers shit!
I will veto any bill with no strong public option, is that so god damn hard!?!

Veto and start all over again, this time let single payer have a place at the table, tell the insurance people to fuck off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rudy23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-18-09 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
3. I prefer to vote for a Democratic President in '12.
I might just prefer to stay home that day if the Obama administration takes a dive on healthcare, and keeps acting like they're Republican-lite.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-18-09 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Yeah, you do
that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rudy23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-18-09 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. I certainly prefer to not contribute, work the phones, post blogs, tell my friends, etc.
You can take that message to the rest of the "who else are you gonna vote for" crowd, too. What was the point of voting for Obama if he's going to capitulate like this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorax7844 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-18-09 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #7
19. deleted
Edited on Tue Aug-18-09 01:52 PM by Lorax7844
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
senseandsensibility Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-18-09 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
4. Gibbs is incredibly insipid
Edited on Tue Aug-18-09 01:40 PM by senseandsensibility
I gave him the benefit of the doubt until now, although his extreme mealy-mouthedness has been evident from the beginning. Now it is obvious that this is the message they wish to convey.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-18-09 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. No, Gibbs is not "insipid"..I don't
think so at all. You all have no idea what's going on behind the scenes in dealing with the fucking repuke shits and the fucking mediawhores.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rudy23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-18-09 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #11
17. Enlighten us. What is going on "behind the scenes?"
Any argument that asks us to rely on information only available to insiders is...shaky.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hutzpa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-18-09 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #4
68. What a fuckery statement
can you do a better job(?) better yet, judging by your knee jerk reaction
it's pointless of me to asked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bertman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-18-09 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #4
70. The chief qualifications for Presidential Press Secretary are: mealymouthed; obfuscator.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
villager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-18-09 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
5. no, they really don't. Just like their Democratic predecessors.
I'm waiting for the party to prove it's been anything other than witheringly useless since 1980...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-18-09 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
6. You.just.don't.get.it.
They have a strategy that's way beyond all this "he's got to say the right words or I'm going to get my shorts in a twit".

Fucking parsing words to get your vent on. Whatever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zodiak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-18-09 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #6
25. Blind trust without evidence is hard to "get"
Edited on Tue Aug-18-09 01:55 PM by Zodiak
You have no information at all, but you have some kind of weird faith even though the tea leaves tell us that Obama is going to betray us on the public option without a pushback (a pushback you are actively trying to prevent, btw). All of the signs are pointing to another capitulation.

You argue based on authority....."they know more than we do", which is itself a logical fallacy. And you should know that.

You've been doing this blind faith thing for weeks, chastizing and insulting other DUers who do not share such a faith.

This is what you do not get: we are NOT a cult of personality. Many DUers have a hard time with faith in God much less a politicians who has already disappointed us numerous times. If you have such a faith, understand that your fellow DUers do not, and no amount of bullying and cajoling is going to change that.

Of course, I know that my post will not change your behavior one bit, but it needs to be said because your behavior is annoying as hell, based on blind faith, and contributes nothing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-18-09 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #25
36. I don't have "blind faith"..so that shoots down your
diatribe. I have history that President Obama knows what the fuck he's doing.

And, yeah, you're right..your feelings on the subject are not going to change how I feel about what this admin is trying to do inspite of the fucking media, rwdeadenders, and people who freak out at the way Robert Gibbs says something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kirby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-18-09 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
8. It was 'Must Have' a few weeks ago n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-18-09 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
9. You took the word "demands" right out of my mouth.
Time for President Obama to start channeling FDR and LBJ. I'm wondering if he's too inexperienced for the job. I believe one of the radio hosts called for him to stop acting like a Senator and to start behaving like a President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phleshdef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-18-09 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
10. Being ruthless, overbearing dickheads will get the administration nowhere with the Senate.
More phony outrage directed at the wrong damn people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-18-09 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. Nobody wants ruthless and overbearing. We already had eight years of that but
we do want authoritative and persuasive and sometimes persuasive can involve both a carrot and a stick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phleshdef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-18-09 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. What carrots and sticks can they give the blue dogs to get them inline?
Do tell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorax7844 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-18-09 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #18
26. how bout I will campaign against your useless ass
works for me
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phleshdef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-18-09 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. Yea, threatening to use Presidential weight to take their seats will get them to cooperate for sure.
Especially since such a tactic would probably fail in these red states.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dgibby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-18-09 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #18
28. How about:
Get with the program and the President et al will campaign for you. Oppose the Admin, and you're on your own. No money, no support, nada. In fact, we'll find someone to run against you.

Who the hell cares if the Blue Dogs are reelected? If they're going to vote with Repubs, then they're useless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phleshdef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-18-09 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #28
40. Well I don't think such threats should be made publically and if they are made, DNC needs to do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-18-09 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #18
47. Take a page out of LBJ's book.
He frequently visited the Senate and he knew where all the closets with the skeletons were and where the bodies were buried. He didn't mind shaking up a recalcitrant Senator or two to get them to change their vote to something he liked better. Obama maybe doesn't have all those things in his playbook but he can promise to help those Senators with a pet pork project if they change their vote on this issue. He certainly needs to replace a lot of his DLC "K" street friendly advisors and listen to the people. We are the ones who filled the Denver stadium and the Mall on Inauguration day, not the insurance companies and HMOs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phleshdef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-18-09 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #47
48. LBJ was a very powerful Senator before he was VP. This LBJ stuff is unrealistic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-18-09 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #48
49. So you are saying our President doesn't have any authority?
That allegation is pretty scary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phleshdef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-18-09 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #49
54. No, thats not what I said, don't pretend to be illiterate to sidestep an argument.
Johnson was the FREAKING MAJORITY LEADER so of course he knew where the bodies were buried, for 1. For 2, Johnson had a Senate that was much more willing to oblige progress than what President Obama has. Its not the same situation and can not be played out the same way. To suggest otherwise is just pure ignorance of the political realities in the year 2009.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-18-09 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #54
57. So according to you, because he doesn't have all the tools in his chest
that LBJ did, he shouldn't be assertive in trying to get Senators to see things his way and he shouldn't use some of LBJ's tactics that might work for him? That doesn't speak much for his leadership. Also, FDR had a few tricks up his sleeve that Obama could learn from. Both managed to get programs passed that had overwhelming opposition from the corporate and monied class. Actually, his hero Lincoln knew how to get things done in the face of opposition as well. He needs to study how they did it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phleshdef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-18-09 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #57
59. He IS getting this done in the face of overwhelming opposition... especially the media...
Which neither of those guys had to deal with the kind of media we have today. And I'm sure he knows a lot more about how those Presidents got things done than you do.

But yea, its a stupid comparison because its not the same at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-18-09 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #47
55. Don't forget that LBJ probably woudn't have been reelected to a 2nd full term in 1968
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-18-09 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #55
58. Yes, but it wasn't because of Medicare. It was because of Vietnam, another
Edited on Tue Aug-18-09 02:56 PM by Cleita
time bomb waiting for Obama if he can't finish those wars Bush got us into. Also, FDR got elected to a third term after he got Social Security passed. So it isn't the passing of social programs that hurt them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-18-09 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #58
60. But it may have been that he had made too many enemies in his own party by bullying
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-18-09 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #60
62. We will never know if he would have won or not, because he chose not
to run. However, I know he would have had a better chance of beating Nixon if he had run, so there is no use in speculating. Many Democrats stayed home when McGovern lost in the primary, but they would have turned out for LBJ. I know. I was alive then and I knew how my peers were thinking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-18-09 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #10
41. it worked pretty well for Bush
and it always seems to work well for Republicans in general...

It's the, "you either vote for what I want or I'm going to cut off federal funds for whatever pet projects you've got going in your state", school of leadership. As opposed to the "If I ask real nice and make an argument based on the moral superiority of my position, will you support my bill, pretty please?", school of leadership.

The latter never seems to work very well - but liberals can always go home, lick their wounds, and find comfort in the fact that they are still better people than conservatives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wetzelbill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-18-09 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
12. yeah I was just listening to that too
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donco6 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-18-09 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
14. Anyone still think public option has a chance?
How gullible can you be?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VMI Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-18-09 01:43 PM
Original message
Its chess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donco6 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-18-09 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
21. I hope you're being sarcastic.
Because I just ate, and that stupid excuse always makes me queasy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Teaser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-18-09 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #14
30. Yep. about a 80% chance to get through, I'd say
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raffi Ella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-18-09 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
16. .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
masuki bance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-18-09 01:48 PM
Response to Original message
20. I'm happy to see that more are recognizing this classic tactic.
For months I have been blown away by how many have been willing to fall for this old trick.

Just a couple weeks ago this would have mollified most here, it's refreshing to see that more and more people aren't falling for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Teaser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-18-09 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #20
35. yeah, they're falling for your kind of never ending bullshit instead.
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
masuki bance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-18-09 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #35
37. Deniers like you are the reason the public option may be optional.
Instead of pushing back on the weasel words, you and others like you denied what was obviously happening and accuse others who have been raising the flag of making it up. I hope your happy at the situation you helped to create.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GarbagemanLB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-18-09 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
22. I'd prefer a president and congress with a spine. I'd prefer to be able to support them in 2012.
No guarantees, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dave29 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-18-09 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
23. President Obama commands that you chill
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dolphindance Donating Member (283 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-18-09 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
24. The goal is to get SOMETHING out of the Senate.
Then clamp down on what is really wanted when the bills are merged. If Obama goes nuclear about the Public Option, the entire "government takeover" meme is seized and the bill will be stalled.

This is about controlling the message so the process doesn't get out of hand prematurely.

Has any sweeping health care bill ever made it is this far? I don't think so.

Hold on to your horses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Teaser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-18-09 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
29. "demanding" at this stage is why Clintoncare died
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-18-09 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #29
34. Yes, that is correct. But apparently we should have followed that tract
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-18-09 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #34
43. it's a different time, the healthcare situation has deteriorated
even further, and we've got huge majorities, a landslide Presidential victory, and a mandate for change.

Why not make some demands?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-18-09 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #34
63. If only we had a martyred DEAD bill!
We could gripe about how it was killed for years!

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-18-09 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #29
39. Really? Isn't that
interesting. Prez Obama is one who learns from the past..others should take note.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alsame Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-18-09 02:04 PM
Original message
Not everything they say is for our consumption only. There are
a number of audiences that they are trying to reach with every word they say.

Would I prefer that he demand a public option? Yes. In fact, I wish he would demand single payer. But there is a game being played.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Teaser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-18-09 02:06 PM
Response to Original message
32. stop talking sense. it's not wanted here
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peacetrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-18-09 02:07 PM
Response to Original message
33. BINGO!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-18-09 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
38. Thank you, alsame!
It seems so obvious to me but the parsing word games just gotta be played.

President Obama is the one who said he was for it and all this other speculation is just..that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alsame Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-18-09 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #38
42. Hi, Cha. And a belated
Happy Birthday!!! :party:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-18-09 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #42
44. Aren't you Sweet! I went
to FDR's Presidential Library on my 65th birthday to Cosmically thank the man..and check out Eleanor's contribution to our country!

Thank you, :party:alsame:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alsame Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-18-09 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #44
46. Very cool! I've been there, it's a wonderful place, I'm sure you
had a great time.:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-18-09 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #46
69. It was
chilling!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
masuki bance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-18-09 02:30 PM
Response to Original message
45. And who, pray tell, is the audience that "prefer" is aimed at?
How is it helpful?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alsame Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-18-09 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #45
51. While I don't pretend to know what is going on behind the scenes,
I do know that President Obama does not have 60 progressive Democratic votes for healthcare. According to some sources, he doesn't even have 50.

If he has to parse words to make a bill palatable for some in Congress (and their constituents), then he should do so.

Until I see a bill without a public option, I'm not going to assume there won't be one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
masuki bance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-18-09 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #51
61. nm. wasted typing. nt
Edited on Tue Aug-18-09 03:25 PM by masuki bance
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU GrovelBot  Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-18-09 02:04 PM
Response to Original message
31. ## PLEASE DONATE TO DEMOCRATIC UNDERGROUND! ##



This week is our third quarter 2009 fund drive. Democratic Underground is
a completely independent website. We depend on donations from our members
to cover our costs. Please take a moment to donate! Thank you!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phleshdef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-18-09 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #31
50. F-U and your phony poutrage Grovelbot! I've had enough of your trolling BS!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-18-09 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
52. how about "DEMANDS"
How about orders?


Dumb!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-18-09 02:43 PM
Response to Original message
53. Last I checked, an American President is not a monarchistic King
We can mealy-mouth all day what "prefers" means... the main thing we need to focus on is that there are five bills in committee that then get amendments tagged on to them in Congress and are then strained into a single bill after the Senate nibbles on all the bills. Then the bills get made into one bill in committees and then go back to the Congress and Senate and get knawed on. If and when the bill is ready, it goes to the President... who signs it or vetos it...

The President doesn't make the bills. He advises on what he wants and what he PREFERS. This is basic stuff.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-18-09 02:52 PM
Response to Original message
56. Where's the OP? Come back and defend your FAIL. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ravishing ruby Donating Member (25 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-18-09 03:18 PM
Response to Original message
64. Was he ever that gung-ho? I am actually relieved that Gibbs used the word 'prefers'
Maybe he's just trying to chill out the teabaggers from totally going off. I listened to Rush for the first few minutes of his show yesterday and he was advising his audience not to get complacent. He must have sensed that there was a ploy in play regarding announcing the killing of public option.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hell Hath No Fury Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-18-09 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #64
65. Yes, he was that gung ho.
During his campaign he insisted that a public option must be part of reform, saying it was the only way to keep the insurance industry honest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ravishing ruby Donating Member (25 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-18-09 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #65
67. During the campaign? Surely you don't believe what people say during election years!
:sarcasm:

Now I recall hearing a statement by POTUS on public option (perhaps even single payer?). When they're running for office, it's like they're drunk and just say anything that comes to mind and deny it the next day! Oh well, I am still holding out hope that he understands how much it'll piss off the public royally if he takes it completely off the table.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC_SKP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-18-09 03:38 PM
Response to Original message
66. If Obama used the word "DEMAND", they he'd be the Muslin Fascist Socialist MONARCH DICTATOR!
Per CNN and MSNBC and, of course, Fox.

He's doing fine, just fine.

:applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freddie mertz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-18-09 04:18 PM
Response to Original message
71. "Prefers" means he will not fight for it.
Same as dumping it.

We have been betrayed.

There is no doubt about it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jesus_of_suburbia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-18-09 04:25 PM
Response to Original message
72. Funny... that sounds like Bill Clinton (someone who the "can do no wrong crowd" detests.)
:shrug:

I wonder if they'll detest Pres Obama too?


I guess they'll start making excuses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 09:56 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC