Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Health Care Act, a republican filibuster, and 60 votes... No one goes under the bus!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Peacetrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-21-09 02:36 PM
Original message
Health Care Act, a republican filibuster, and 60 votes... No one goes under the bus!
Edited on Fri Aug-21-09 02:55 PM by Peacetrain
I am hoping strong constitutionalists who understand the exact working of how a bill gets passed in the senate will check in with this also.

Here is the corker. I like many, had thought that 50 plus would get us our Health Bill. If the republicans want to hide under the desk while we released the nuclear option.. so be it.

Now, listening to the talking heads.. This scenario has come up. If the Republicans filibuster in the senate it will take 60 votes to pass it.

That means we need blue dogs and all other ships at sea.

From the sounds of Grassley and Snowe we are going to get a filibuster.

We can't be throwing anyone under the bus..we are going to need them all.

Edit to add.. Thank you everyone for the input.. It cleared up a LOT of misconceptions on my part.. back to work for this one..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Xipe Totec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-21-09 02:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yet...
The first time the blue dogs enable a filibuster, will be the last time they enable a filibuster.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peacetrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-21-09 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. I think it was Racheal last night..that showed a chart of how the
Republicans have been filibustering every bill since 2006. I mean the filibuster is used by everyone but it has taken a 4 fold spike since 06.

Ed keeps railing for the 50 plus VP vote =51.. well if they filibuster we will need 60. No wonder the President is on a 24/7 charm offensive with them.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MNDemNY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-21-09 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
2. So, you are OK with a watered down bill with NO public option?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peacetrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-21-09 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. No the President and the Speaker both have said.. PO will be a part of the bill
But we have to pressure the dogs..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MNDemNY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-21-09 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. Even Hoyer is noe syint that the PO will have to go.
No public option...NO bill!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peacetrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-21-09 02:51 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. If we do not have a PO, I just do not see the bill going forward.
PO is a part of it, not the only part.. Reform is a part of it.. not the only part.. but honestly I do not see any of it standing alone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-21-09 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #12
18. If no bill goes forward, Dems are toast in 2010
it will be game over.

Baucus, Bayh and those types will be most in jeopardy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demwing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-21-09 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #2
17. You simply do not understand the politics
If you do not pass the bill, in some form, then it dies in Senate. Pass a watered down version of the bill, then, in the budget reconciliation process(where no filibusters are allowed), the bill gets toughened up again, and all we need is a simple majority (51 votes) to pass the damn bill.

Here's a rather convuluted Wikipedia article on the process:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reconciliation_(U.S._Congress)

BushCo used the same process to push through multiple tax cuts, and tried to use it to slam through drilling in ANWR.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-21-09 02:46 PM
Response to Original message
3. The Senate has "Reconciliation" for budget items.
Edited on Fri Aug-21-09 02:47 PM by Eric J in MN
They could put the Public Option in there, and pass it with 50 Senators plus VP Joe Biden.

Passing regulations of the insurance industry would take 60 votes if there is a filibuster.

So getting the current House bill through the Senate would probably require dividing the bill in two in the Senate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peacetrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-21-09 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. So that is why there is talk of a split bill.. that makes more sense
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Birthmark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-21-09 02:46 PM
Response to Original message
5. We do not need 60 votes for the bill.
We need 60 votes to break the procedural maneuver of the filibuster. Frankly, any Democrat who would thwart their President's wishes through such a maneuver should immediately be stripped of all seniority on all committees on which they serve.

They can vote any way their conscience (if any) dictates on the actual bill. But if they vote against cloture then the hell with them...down to the last one.

They should face primary challenges when they get home, too. I'll gladly send money to such challengers.

Enough is enough. This is bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peacetrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-21-09 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Okay let me see if I have it straight.. we need the dogs to break the filibuster
(Good Lord you would hope they would do that) then we can get it through on 51?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-21-09 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. Blue Dogs are in the House, not the Senate.
Conservative Democrats in the Senate (and the House) are called DLC-ers after the Democratic Leadership Council.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blue_Dog_Coalition
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peacetrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-21-09 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. DLC'ers?.. then time to put Bill Clinton in there to turn up the heat
with some well place phone calls
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlinPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-21-09 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #9
20. Yes. But the "Senate Bluedogs" like Nelson are in with the republicans on health care.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Birthmark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-21-09 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #9
22. That's correct.
We only need 60 votes for Cloture. Then they take the vote on the actual legislation. If they won't vote for Cloture, then they are working for the Republican Party as far as I'm concerned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlinPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-21-09 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #5
19. About sending money to challengers: I have been giving money to the DCCC for years to help increase
the number of Democrats in the house. Now, it is hard for me to do that because they give some of the money to help Blue Dogs along with everyone else. So my solution is to give the same money but mail it directly to campaigns of Democratic primary challengers to Blue Dogs or directly to those whom I consider to be real Democrats in races against republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Birthmark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-21-09 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. That's my plan, too.
I don't vote for Democrats to have them side with Republicans against a Democratic President. I won't contribute directly to such individuals, and I'll do my best to avoid helping them indirectly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Magistrate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-21-09 02:48 PM
Response to Original message
8. The 'Moderates' And 'Centerists', Ma'am, Will Have To Stand Up And Take The Fire
It is not a question of 'throwing anyone under the bus', it is a question of being willing to take a hit for the team, defined as the people of the country and the Party. Democratic Senators from 'red states' are going to have to stand up and put their seats at risk, and if they do not, will deserve every calumny of cowardice and corruption and petty self-serving that has traditionally been directed at them here from the left. It has been my practice to defend such people here on occasion from such charges, arguing that is necessary to preserve their seats for a future battle on decent odds. Well, the time of that battle is now. No fight was ever won without casualties.

"The art of war consists in a well-reasoned and extremely circumspect defense, followed by audacious attack."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peacetrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-21-09 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. I am with you on that
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cronus Protagonist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-21-09 02:52 PM
Response to Original message
13. Let them fillibuster our Medicare for All bill
And when it ends, as all filibusters do, we pass it anyway. The opposition can then reap their rewards next election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peacetrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-21-09 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
16. Thank you everyone for the input.. It cleared up a LOT of misconceptions on my part..
Edited on Fri Aug-21-09 02:57 PM by Peacetrain
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clear Blue Sky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-21-09 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
23. We own both houses of Congress. Pass the damn thing already.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-21-09 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. Right. I'm tired of bull shit excuses like the "Republicans might filibuster"
Make them filibuster .... on the Senate floor.

The Democratic majority controls the Senate and makes the Senate rules, not the Republicans.

And people wonder why many believe the Democrats in Congress pushovers and whimps.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clear Blue Sky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-21-09 05:22 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. The Repubs don't have the votes to filibuster.
We could bring Congress back into session Monday and pass the entire thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-22-09 10:00 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. You may be right .... but if they threaten to filibuster call them on it!

And make them filibuster on the floor on the Senate. No fake "phone it in" filibusters!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 08:16 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC