Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Try Things The LBJ Way?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-21-09 05:02 PM
Original message
Try Things The LBJ Way?
Edited on Fri Aug-21-09 05:17 PM by babylonsister
http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2009_08/019591.php

TRY THINGS THE LBJ WAY?.... Matt Yglesias shares a story today about Sen. James Eastland of Mississippi, a far-right Democrat back in the Dixiecrat era, that I hadn't heard in a while. It's has quite a bit of relevance to current events.

Eastland's chairmanship of the Judiciary Committee obviously made passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 impossible. Senate Majority Leader Mike Mansfield and President Lyndon Johnson dealt with this by just . . . not letting the bill get bottled up in committee and bringing it to the floor instead. The sky didn't fall! Leading politicians decided that justice was more important that the dead hand of Senate procedure and they brought the bill to the floor where it was voted on.


Imagine that. Four-and-a-half decades later, this procedural detail is a tidbit of trivia. I suspect, at the time, Eastland and his allies characterized this as an outrageous power-grab. Had the phrase existed, "nuclear option" probably would have been thrown around casually. If Fox News were around, Mansfield and LBJ would have been labeled authoritarian dictators, ramming controversial legislation down the throat of lawmakers.

Indeed, in a contemporary context, Mansfield and LBJ would be expected to wait patiently, while Eastland tried to negotiate a "compromise" with opponents of the Civil Rights Act that could win support from the left and right. There'd be demands that lawmakers "take their time" to "get it right," eschewing "arbitrary deadlines." The David Broders would say landmark bills like these demand broad consensus. Lawmakers confronted with angry cries from conservative activists would be seen as proof that Mansfield and LBJ should "slow down" and temper their ambitions, while Eastland waters down the bill.

Instead, Mansfield and LBJ decided to skip the committee and pass the bill anyway. There was talk from the far-right about "nullification," but in time, the hysterical found something new to focus their attention on. Now, no one even remembers the process, but everyone remembers the policy.

As this relates to health care reform in 2009, it's not even clear what more the Gang of Six have to talk about. They've been looking at the same proposals, the same numbers, and the same budget for months. They wanted to work over August, but instead, they had one telephone chat last night, and agreed to talk again in two weeks. At that point, they'll look at the same proposals, the same numbers, and the same budget some more.

There's been a Sept. 15 deadline hanging over their heads for a while, but the Gang of Six no longer cares. In fact, the gang's members have decided to ignore the deadline, so they can stare at the same proposals, the same numbers, and the same budget indefinitely.

Mansfield and LBJ wouldn't put the policy goal at risk for the sake of process. Reid and Obama have every reason to follow their precedent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-21-09 05:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. That makes sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DebbieCDC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-21-09 05:05 PM
Response to Original message
2. They have every reason to -- yes
Will they -- no

The dems are nothing but spineless shadows of their former selves

Although I despise LBJ for Vietnam, he KNEW how to get important socially progressive legislation passed.

Too bad we can't say the same for the current occupant of the white house and senate majority leader.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laelth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-21-09 05:14 PM
Response to Original message
3. Excellent bit of relevant history. Thanks. n/t
:dem:

-Laelth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jwirr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-21-09 05:58 PM
Response to Original message
4. Back then there was a powerhouse in Congress. Mansfield, LBJ, and
Rayburn from Texas could have gotten a deal that Rahm can only dream about. I wish they were all back for a year. We really need them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomCADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-21-09 07:43 PM
Response to Original message
5. Uh, JFK Had Campaigned On Medicare, It Got Bogged Down In Congress, Then JFK Was Killed
Lyndon Johnson then was able to capitalize on the out pouring of grief, because you really could not effectively slander a President who was assassinated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 11:33 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC