Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Dick Lugars response to my Health Care Reform inquiry.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
and-justice-for-all Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-27-09 09:19 PM
Original message
Dick Lugars response to my Health Care Reform inquiry.
Thank you for contacting me with your views on health care reform. I would like to share with you a statement that I made regarding the health reform debate in Congress:



"A majority of the Members of Congress share President Obama's humane goal that millions more Americans might enjoy health insurance coverage and that medical care to all Americans might be substantially improved. For the moment, however, President Obama and the Congress must recognize that the overwhelming demand of most Americans is that presidential and congressional leadership should focus each day on restoration of jobs, strengthening of housing opportunities, new growth in small business and large industries, and banks that are not only solvent but confident of normal lending. In essence, the task facing national leadership is truly monumental. A national and international recession has not ended and many economists predict that unemployment in the United States will grow in coming months.



The President and the current Congress have come into office in the midst of a fiscal year that has already suffered a budget deficit of $1.086 trillion with a final deficit for fiscal 2009 predicted around $1.8 trillion. The appropriation bills that the Congress is considering, and that will make up the next fiscal year's expenditures, are predicted to result in another annual deficit of more than $1 trillion. In the first nine months of this fiscal year, Medicaid spending has increased by 23 percent to $186 billion. Spending on food stamps has increased 36.8 percent to $40 billion. Unemployment benefits have increased 165 percent to $77 billion. The current budget deficit can be equated at $8,500 per American family with similar spending projected ahead for the coming year.



Republicans and Democrats may feel that passing comprehensive health legislation before the summer recess or adjournment in the fall is crucial to the success or failure of the Obama administration and/or party leadership in the Congress.



But I would suggest that successful leadership will be defined, now and historically, by success in bringing a horrendous economic recession to an end, bringing new strength to our economy, and providing vital leadership in international relations as we hope to bring conflicts under control and in some cases, to conclusion.



I appreciate that President Obama has strongly argued that comprehensive health care legislation is an important component to reducing federal deficit spending. He has contended that failure to pass this legislation will increase deficits now and for many years to come. I disagree with the President.



After the economic recession in our country comes to a conclusion, a high priority may be extension of health insurance coverage and reform of many health care practices. When such changes occur, they are likely to be expensive and Americans will need to debate, even then, their priority in comparison to many other national goals. One reason why health care is likely to remain expensive is that major advances in surgical procedures, prescription drugs, and other health care practices have prolonged the lives of tens of millions of Americans and improved the quality of those additional years. The Washington Post, in a front-page story on July 26, 2009, mentioned that "the fight against heart disease has been slow and incremental. It's also been extremely expensive and wildly successful." Americans should not take for granted all of the advances in health care that have enriched our lives, but we sometimes forget that we require and even pray for much more medical progress in years to come, which is likely to be expensive.



After the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office reported that current legislative proposals might increase health costs by more than $1 trillion during the next ten years, several Members of Congress have suggested new forms of taxation, reduction of payments to doctors and hospitals, and curtailment of certain types of insurance coverage. These and other suggestions may temporarily bring about cost reduction but will also have some after-effects in the overall economy. In fact, strong financial incentives may be needed to enlist men and women to enter the medical field. Failure to enlist a sufficient number of doctors could lead to rationing of service and longer lines to find someone who will give humane attention.



In the meanwhile, it is possible that the President and Members of Congress might find some inexpensive, incremental improvements that could result in a greater number of Americans being served through health insurance and more efficiently operating health care institutions. The strong desire that most of us have to continue discussing these issues and make improvements need not be postponed even as President Obama and the Congress strive for victory over a devastating national economic recession.



Because our federal spending deficits have risen so much and are predicted to rise even more, all substantive discussions on health care and other important issues will be conducted during many years of planning and, finally, decisive action to reduce deficit spending and preserve the value and integrity of the dollar as we continue to borrow hundreds of billions of dollars in the form of U.S. Treasury Bonds sold to governments and citizens of other countries. They, too, are counting on the integrity of our dollar and our financial system to preserve the value of their financial reserves.



Starting with President Obama and extending to all Members of Congress, we wish that we had inherited a neutral, peaceful playing field. We have not been so fortunate. Our responsibility now is to recognize the extraordinary financial tragedy that has befallen our country and to recognize the unprecedented opportunity that we have to stop the momentum of that tragedy. We must provide valid hope of constructive vision, idealism, and change in the future. I look forward to working with the President and my colleagues to tackle first things first."



Thank you, again, for sharing your thoughts with me.



Sincerely,


Richard G. Lugar
United States Senator
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-27-09 09:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. Thoughtful response, albeit not friendly to the reform cause.
I've always respected Lugar, even though I never agree with him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Monk06 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-27-09 09:40 PM
Response to Original message
2. In other words the economy before health care reform. Which is just another way to bury the issue

just like the last three attempts to put
a leash on the insurance industry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rebel with a cause Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-27-09 09:48 PM
Response to Original message
3. This was the responce from my congressman,
a Democratic representive who is planning on voting against Obama's plan. I am not too happy with the situation or him at the moment, but maybe I am wrong.
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

I wanted to let you know that I have met with, received e-mails, faxes and letters from over 5,000 people in the past six months on the Healthcare Reform issue. Below is a brief summary of questions and suggestions I have received.


1.Do we need to change the current system?

The answer from almost everyone is YES.


2.Why do we need to change the system?

a) The skyrocketing cost of insurance, co-payments and prescription drugs.

b) If you get laid off or lose your job, you lose your insurance.

c) The 47 million people who are uninsured are getting their primary care in the hospital emergency room which costs everyone far more than if they had a doctor for preventative care.


3.Do I support the proposals pending in the US House?

NO. They go too far too fast, create a complicated new system and the proposal may cost far more than the projected cost.


4.What do I favor?

I have supported a single payer system similar to Medicare for several years. However, it is clear that we lack the support in Congress and from the American people to enact single payer at this time.


5.Where do we go from here?

My advice to the administration and congressional leaders is to slow things down and examine what is working and not working in the current system. It is more important to get it right than to just get something done.


6.Why are you not holding town meetings?

I have held over 400 town meetings since I have been in Congress. In the beginning, the town meeting forum was productive. Unfortunately, they became unproductive for almost everyone in attendance when a few people traveled from meeting to meeting in order to dominate the time with their one issue; therefore I stopped holding town hall meetings a few years ago.



However, I very much appreciate hearing from you on this important issue and want you to know that I will work to find a solution to the problems that exist in the current system.


Sincerely,

Jerry F. Costello
Member of Congress
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC_SKP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-27-09 10:01 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Looks like Jerry Costello wants to "study the issue"...
Bullshit.

Thanks for sharing tho, I'm lucky to have Jerry McNerney as my rep.

:patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rebel with a cause Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-27-09 10:55 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. I have usually agreed with Costello
Edited on Thu Aug-27-09 11:03 PM by rebel with a cause
and was happy with him, but this time he has lost me. I will have a hard time voting for him next time he runs, and would only do so if he won the primary and because he is a democrat. :shrug:

Perhaps Obama, Durbin and (even) Burris need to remind Costello what state he is in! Evidently the citizens that contacted him had no compact on him.

Edited to add that Costello has never struck me as a far left Democrat, so his stance on single payer insurance or nothing really shocks me. I am not accusing him of anything, he may really feel like this, but I still wonder how friendly he is with private insurance lobbyist?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Egnever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-27-09 10:07 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. They got disruptive so I stopped doing them
Isnt that special.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proud Liberal Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-27-09 10:42 PM
Response to Original message
6. Ah, the "Lieberman approach"
I'm sure people having some more discretionary money to spend after their health care costs go down won't do ANYTHING to help the economy.

:sarcasm:

I generally respect Lugar even though I hardly ever agree with him and he is clearly wrong here IMHO. We've been "punting" this issue as a country for 50+ years now and the last attempt to reform health care was 16 years ago when we weren't even in as bad shape as we are now. We need to start addressing this NOW!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 06:09 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC