Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Until last year, Senator Edward M. Kennedy’s health care bill was a bill known as Medicare for All

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-31-09 06:53 AM
Original message
Until last year, Senator Edward M. Kennedy’s health care bill was a bill known as Medicare for All
Let's Pass Ted Kennedy's Health Plan
by Roger Hickey

Let’s get a few things straight:

Until last year, Senator Edward M. Kennedy’s health care bill (co-authored with with Rep. John Dingell) was a bill known as Medicare for All*. Not expensive private insurance for some, but Medicare for All.

*
http://kennedy.senate.gov/newsroom/press_release.cfm?id=B30A5C7B-35AC-4CC9-8192-1B1E50FC8356

Senator Kennedy encouraged candidate and then President Obama to make health care for all his first priority -- during the campaign and as he took office.

And Ted Kennedy remained in charge as his HELP (Health, Education and Labor and Pension) Committee wrote -- and then passed -- a new health care bill with a strong public insurance option for those who want it.

I feel the need to remind people of all this because conservatives, and especially Republican Senators, are trying to promote the idea that if only Ted Kennedy were still actively involved in the health care reform effort, he could have gotten the Democrats to fold and embrace a weakened “bi-partisan” compromised health reform strategy. And some are urging that the best tribute we could construct to the great man’s memory is to pass such a watered-down health bill that could win the support of a large number of conservative Republicans.

Media Matters has done a good job of tracking and responding to the crocodile tears of Republicans, keying off of a Politico obituary that repeats the conservative spin that “without Kennedy, Democrats were less willing to make the concessions needed for true compromise.” But whatever Politico’s role, their journalism certainly picked up on the boldly outrageous statements of important conservatives. One by one, Media Matters’ quotes Republicans from Orin Hatch to John McCain, lamenting that Kennedy’s passing has deprived them all of a “reasonable” Democrat who would have won Republican votes by getting rid of the public plan or making the cost of “reform” dramatically smaller.

Let’s get another thing clear:

Republicans don’t want a deal. They want to kill health reform.

more here...

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/roger-hickey/lets-pass-ted-kennedys-he_b_272340.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-31-09 06:58 AM
Response to Original message
1. It had to be said! - k&r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jannyk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-31-09 07:15 AM
Response to Original message
2. The PO was the compromise! Ted wanted Universal Health Care! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeycola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-31-09 07:40 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Yes, I recall this. I wonder
what or who changed his mind--?. Kennedy was so passionate about this bill when he first introduced it. His new bill is a version of the Mass. health plan--with private insurance companies -for the most part--happy and gleeful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-31-09 07:44 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. He recognized political reality. Single payer was not going to pass any time soon and we needed to
Edited on Mon Aug-31-09 07:45 AM by Mass
change things as quickly as possible.

For Kennedy, it was not an ideological fight. He wanted more people to be able to have access to care ASAP. If it meant using the public option rather than single payer, he was ready to do it. If it meant finding a way to do it without a public option because it cannot be done, he would have found the way as long as it made people's life better. The issue was not ideology. The issue was getting a result.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeycola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-31-09 07:47 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. He and other Dems did not even TRY. I call that being weak
on leadership. We get the same old tired excuse each time--(it would not have passed).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-31-09 07:54 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. So, you would have been happy with a vanity vote? I prefer that they
figure out something that will pass AND help people, and clearly, they have difficulties just doing that, single payer or not in the mix. Yes, this means some Dems are only Dems in name, but this is the reality we live in. As long as we cannot convince people to send decent Democrats to Congress, this is how it will be.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeycola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-31-09 07:58 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. You believe the rhetoric that it would not have passed. Well,
whatever. I believe they should have tried.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-31-09 08:00 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Sanders believes it would not pass. He said so. I guess he is also sold to the
Edited on Mon Aug-31-09 08:02 AM by Mass
corporatists. Whatever!

Now, by all means, have a vote. I think they should have it now the debate is there. But stop blaming people like Kennedy because they recognized political reality and tried to make a reform that had a chance to pass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeycola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-31-09 08:09 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Sorry but I believe that the Dems could have
been influential in strongly pushing for single payer.
But, they flopped and sold out. And I include the WH in this--they pushed the mantra that it could not have passed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-31-09 08:32 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. because the WH was doing back room deals to make sure it never passed with Big Pharma and
the Insurance boys and the hospitals conglomerates..

Need those bucks to run in 2012 don'tcha know!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeycola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-31-09 09:31 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. yes, I agree.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-31-09 09:47 AM
Response to Reply #8
12. Not only that, Sanders has said the HELP bill public option is strong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 03:23 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC