|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
OwnedByFerrets (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-02-09 07:58 AM Original message |
Medicare for ALL. Its easy to Define and easy to Defend. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DangerousRhythm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-02-09 07:59 AM Response to Original message |
1. Seriously. I'm not sure why they didn't go this route to start with. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joeycola (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-02-09 01:46 PM Response to Reply #1 |
17. weak spines. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Captain Hilts (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-02-09 08:00 AM Response to Original message |
2. Clinton proposed dropping the eligibility for it to 55. He's THE worst!!! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JeanGrey (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-02-09 08:03 AM Response to Original message |
3. Not going to happen. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
quantass (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-02-09 08:09 AM Response to Original message |
4. I agree -- this is how the conversation SHOULD have started -- and then let the negotiations begin |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SpartanDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-02-09 08:22 AM Response to Reply #4 |
6. You don't think the media would've noticed that he went back on his campaign promise? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
msongs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-02-09 08:52 AM Response to Reply #6 |
8. ummm medicare for all IF you want it? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OwnedByFerrets (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-02-09 09:45 AM Response to Reply #6 |
10. Did I really NEED to spell out in my headline that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CreekDog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-02-09 08:19 AM Response to Original message |
5. It is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Historic NY (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-02-09 08:48 AM Response to Original message |
7. The 'Kennedy Medicare Reform Bill of 2009.' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nicholas D Wolfwood (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-02-09 09:41 AM Response to Original message |
9. Just as importantly - easiest to justify through reconciliation. (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mariawr (171 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-02-09 10:33 AM Response to Original message |
11. That just makes SO MUCH SENSE... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Better Believe It (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-02-09 08:50 PM Response to Reply #11 |
21. "They" didn't go that route because it would have been opposed by the insurance and drug industry |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OwnedByFerrets (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-03-09 07:48 AM Response to Reply #21 |
22. ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-02-09 10:38 AM Response to Original message |
12. Medicare for all is Single-Payer, which Obama opposes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tinrobot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-02-09 12:22 PM Response to Reply #12 |
16. Not really... insurance companies already supplement Medicare. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
phantom power (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-02-09 12:01 PM Response to Original message |
13. It's the easiest thing in the world. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
quantass (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-02-09 12:04 PM Response to Original message |
14. The ONLY reason to oppose (Medicare For All == Single Payer) is Politics / Donors. A Shame. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slipslidingaway (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-02-09 12:13 PM Response to Original message |
15. knr n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-02-09 02:00 PM Response to Original message |
18. Absolutely - NOBODY wants to trash Medicare. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OwnedByFerrets (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-02-09 02:04 PM Response to Reply #18 |
19. Exactly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bichonpups (19 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-02-09 08:43 PM Response to Original message |
20. I certainly dont want to trash Medicare....... k/r |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu May 02nd 2024, 07:35 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC