Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

If Obama is giving up on the public option, here is what upsets me the most

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
DrToast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-03-09 10:09 AM
Original message
If Obama is giving up on the public option, here is what upsets me the most
Edited on Thu Sep-03-09 10:11 AM by DrToast
It's not like the public option is some crazy idea that only a fringe part of American supports.

The public option is popular. It polls anywhere from mid-50s to the mid-70 percent range.

Basically what we're seeing is another example that our government doesn't represent us.

And that really isn't Obama's fault.

But where I do find fault with him is that he said he would fight this. He said the special interests wouldn't rule the day under his administration. But they are. Still. And I don't know what he's doing about that.

I'd rather see him fight and lose than "win" a battle not worth winning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-03-09 10:13 AM
Response to Original message
1. If he loses there is nothing to be gained. I don't want an empty political victory.
But he has to push for some legitimate health care reform that includes the equivalent of a public option. If he loses the battle the Rethugs will say they have one and he will be weakened. Clinton lost the reform battle and Dems lost in the midterms. Clinton was never able to attempt liberal policies again...it was all centrist policies (Nafta, welfare reform). He won reelection and kept the economy on track but eventually the country suffered and Bush made it even worse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-03-09 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. You misconstue history, so you are doomed to repeat the mistakes of the past.
In 1994, Democrats stayed home in droves because the Party veered so far right they couldn't support it. Sound familiar?

NAFTA was passed before 1994. Which is one reason Democrats stayed home.

Here's what happened;

Republican voted in almost equal numbers in both the 1990 and the 1994 mid terms.

Democrats voted in much larger numbers in 1990 than they did in 1994. The reason was Clinton backed right wing bullshit, and nobody showed up in 1994 because they wanted more liberal policies.

When this happens again, as I predict it will, in 2010, please please please don't listen to CNN and Fox. Please take a look at who voted and who stayed home.

Then maybe you will figure out that when Dems vote like Repos, they lose.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-03-09 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #4
12. You are probably correct...I was only 17 then and was probably manipulated
Edited on Thu Sep-03-09 11:19 AM by Jennicut
by the media. If we just decide to let the bill fail, I still worry about what will happen. But I think if we lose liberals we will be much worse off. The question is how does Obama keep both the liberals and the independents who voted for him?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-03-09 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. Primarily by acting and voting like a Democrat. First off, he should meet with
single payer people and actually discuss it like an adult. He doesn't have to embrace or endorse, he just needs to listen and take into account those views.

He needs to call for a very strong and completely accessible public option. He needs to tell the Dems that if they don't pass it, he won't sign a bill that is essentially Romney Care.

And then he needs to stick with that.

The independents who voted for him did so because they are liberal. Why else? Because they are conservative? Nope.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uponit7771 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-03-09 10:13 AM
Response to Original message
2. Are you STILL believing what the M$M tells you?!?! How CLEAR does Obama have to be on the pubOption?
He WANTS it!!

Sry, just...the sky is blue and Obama wants the public option and NOTHING they have said since has been the opposite!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-03-09 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Sure he wants it.
But will he stick his neck out and fight for it? I don't knows.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uponit7771 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-03-09 10:32 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. What else do you need??! My goodness people...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrToast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-03-09 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. How about: Any bill I sign must have a public option.
That would help.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-03-09 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #7
14. How many times do you want him to say it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrToast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-03-09 11:33 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. He's also said that a public option isn't required
Except he's said that about a hundred times. Whereas you've found one quote from six weeks ago.

What has he said more recently?

"All I'm saying is, though, that the public option, whether we have it or not, we don't have it, is not the entirety of health care reform. This is just one sliver of it. One aspect of it."


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/08/16/white-houses-mixed-messag_n_260733.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phx_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-03-09 05:38 PM
Response to Reply #7
19. No, it wouldn't. If Clinton had gotten a bill that included
Edited on Thu Sep-03-09 05:45 PM by Phx_Dem
reform only in terms of not excluding people with pre-existing conditions, not being able to cancel a policy that was current in payment, etc., we'd be halfway there. To veto a bill that is good in these respects just because it doesn't include a public option is stuipid and harmful to the millions of people that are being denied every single day.

I absolutely want a public option and I think we'll get one, but if we don't that doesn't mean you throw the baby out with the bathwater and end up with nothing. That is stupid and self-destructive.

If Kennedy (by his own admission) had agreed to Nixon's health care compromise, Clinton would have had something to build on in 1994 and we'd have more than we do today. In fact, we might be talking seriously about a single-payer plan today. Saying no because you don't get everything you want is not the answer.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-03-09 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #2
11. He could say in his address to Congress that he will not sign a bill without a strong public option.

That's how clear he can and should be.

Do you have a problem with that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-03-09 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
6. HE'S NOT!!!!!!!
Stop reading Politico and amatuerish, half-baked analysis from MSM bobbleheads.

Ugh!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DevonRex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-03-09 10:44 AM
Response to Original message
8. It hasn't happened. If it does, you have a right to be angry. Let's see
what he says next week. In the meantime make your calls and write your emails.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoSheep Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-03-09 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
9. Has he? I really don't think he has. Who are you listening to?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DevonRex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-03-09 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. Apparently some folks swallow MSM bullshit hook, line and sinker. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoSheep Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-03-09 05:10 PM
Response to Reply #10
18. It's very frustrating. Sometimes I want to divide this place into
those who DO buy that line and those who don't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-03-09 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
13. Don't believe the shit..that's what they want.
That's what the corporatemediawhores want, the dumbshit republicons, and those around here who are the fail pushers.

Too bad they got to you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-03-09 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
15. Special interests do not "rule the day." You're making definitive statements based on "if'? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC