Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Senate election schedule in Massachusetts

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
TayTay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-03-09 10:43 AM
Original message
Senate election schedule in Massachusetts
Via State House News on the http://www.wickedlocal.com/belmont/news/x1886195751/Patrick-amplifies-push-for-interim-Senate-appointment-power">Wicked Local/Belmont site:

Candidates are required to gather 10,000 signatures and live in the Bay State at the time of the election. Nomination papers for party primaries are due with local elections officials by 5 p.m. on Oct. 20, with certified nomination papers due with the state elections division by 5 p.m. on Nov. 3. For voters, the final day to register to vote in the Senate primary is Nov. 18, and the deadline for final election registration is Dec. 30.


Primary: December 8th
General Election: January 19th

Getting 10,000 signatures means you have to GET 20,000 or more signatures to make sure you have valid voters. (The MA Republicans had a candidacy invalided last year when a major candidate fell short of the 10,000 mark. It is decidedly not easy to get those 20,000 when you know the deadline. It is an order of magnitude harder to do this in 6 or 7 weeks.)

Candidates HAVE TO START ANNOUNCING for the seat. Martha Coakley did so today. Others will follow within days. They have to do this or we won't have an election.

There is zero disrespect for Sen. Kennedy or his family in this. None. This is simply a matter of procedure and getting valid candidates into the race, which really begins in earnest after those sigs are filed and certified. Some candidates, after all, might not make it past that first test.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TayTay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-03-09 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
1. Ah, people here do understand how short this period is, right?
Edited on Thu Sep-03-09 10:51 AM by TayTay
That list of 8 or more people running in each party will dwindle to 2 or 3 and those will depend on people with proven organizations and who are proven fundraisers.

This could require $5 million from each person in the primary. Not everyone has or can raise cash that fast. Getting the 20,000 or more sigs will almost certainly require the use of outside groups, or professionals to get sigs and that costs money as well. ($1 - $10 a sig or so.)

Ah, when would people suggest that candidates start announcing for the seat? There is not disrespect for Sen. Kennedy in this. Last I checked he ran for office in Massachusetts and obeyed and understood all the rules for running in the state.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blaukraut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-03-09 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
2. Someone had to go first, and it happened to be Martha
I'm not faulting her for this at all. The schedule is tight, as you explained very well. I'm guessing Lynch is next, and then, depending on Joe Kennedy's decision, Markey and Capuano. Looks like my favorite (Tierney) isn't going to run, so I have to pick another one :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TayTay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-03-09 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Short schedule favor certain kinds of races
and this looks to be a brutal schedule. We could be looking at a really intense race.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izquierdista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-03-09 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
4. Like watching paint dry
In the time it takes for a candidate to get on the ballot, other democracies could have a vote of no confidence, schedule an election, hold the vote, count the votes, and seat the new government. American elections are still stuck in the 18th century, including the quaint habit of having the election on a Tuesday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 05:14 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC