|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
jenmito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-06-09 11:12 AM Original message |
It looks like the Obama admin. beat the media! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WeDidIt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-06-09 11:18 AM Response to Original message |
1. There was no coherent message |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jennicut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-06-09 11:22 AM Response to Reply #1 |
3. You also compared Obama to Hoover. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WeDidIt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-06-09 11:23 AM Response to Reply #3 |
4. He's most definitely the WEAKEST president since Hoover |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jennicut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-06-09 11:28 AM Response to Reply #4 |
7. We shall see. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jefferson_dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-06-09 11:30 AM Response to Reply #4 |
9. Duly noted. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
phleshdef (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-06-09 11:31 AM Response to Reply #9 |
13. And his/her credibility of historical knowledge in general. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
phleshdef (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-06-09 11:30 AM Response to Reply #4 |
11. The longer you stand by a statement like that, the more your credibility is damaged. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tridim (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-06-09 11:32 AM Response to Reply #4 |
14. Thanks for the Sunday morning laugh. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rufus dog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-06-09 11:39 AM Response to Reply #4 |
18. CAPS CAPS CAPS CAPS CAPS CAPS |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SemiCharmedQuark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-06-09 11:46 AM Response to Reply #4 |
22. How was Hoover weak? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gman2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-06-09 11:47 AM Response to Reply #4 |
23. While I understand your point, it is naive. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FatDave (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-06-09 03:21 PM Response to Reply #23 |
55. Or maybe they shouldn't waste time worrying about how they'll be percieved... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
skipos (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-06-09 12:05 PM Response to Reply #4 |
30. You must have had different history classes then I did |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SemiCharmedQuark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-06-09 12:08 PM Response to Reply #30 |
31. He wasn't weak. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WeDidIt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-06-09 12:09 PM Response to Reply #30 |
33. He and his entire party got their asses handed to them in '32. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SemiCharmedQuark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-06-09 12:18 PM Response to Reply #33 |
34. So did the Republicans in 2006 and 2008 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WeDidIt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-06-09 12:19 PM Response to Reply #34 |
35. He still got his tax cuts |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SemiCharmedQuark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-06-09 12:30 PM Response to Reply #35 |
37. But Hoover didn't have problems in Congress |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WeDidIt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-06-09 12:32 PM Response to Reply #37 |
38. Which is pretty fucking weak. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SemiCharmedQuark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-06-09 12:35 PM Response to Reply #38 |
40. So getting Congress to do what you want is weak? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WeDidIt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-06-09 12:39 PM Response to Reply #40 |
45. No, combining a do nothing congress with a do nothing adminsitration |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SemiCharmedQuark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-06-09 12:47 PM Response to Reply #45 |
49. He WASN'T a do nothing president though |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SemiCharmedQuark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-06-09 12:51 PM Response to Reply #45 |
51. Please give me your definition of "weak" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SemiCharmedQuark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-06-09 12:28 PM Response to Reply #34 |
36. Let me add to this: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dionysus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-06-09 12:33 PM Response to Reply #4 |
39. ha ha ha ha ha..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Phx_Dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-06-09 12:38 PM Response to Reply #4 |
44. You get the award for the lamest and least true statement yet. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Aramchek (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-06-09 12:48 PM Response to Reply #4 |
50. You are full of FAIL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-06-09 01:31 PM Response to Reply #50 |
53. I love that... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
msallied (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-06-09 01:33 PM Response to Reply #4 |
54. Wow, 8 months into a 4 year term for you to say that? You really are hilarious. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-06-09 12:36 PM Response to Reply #1 |
41. You didn't understand..all you do is look for |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-06-09 01:14 PM Response to Reply #1 |
52. I just saw Axelrod on MTP and he said no such thing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HopeOverFear (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-06-09 11:21 AM Response to Original message |
2. They may have beat the media but they didn't beat Glen Bleck |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-06-09 11:26 AM Response to Reply #2 |
6. It is disturbing - the other side never caves, but our guys... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WHAT (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-06-09 04:54 PM Response to Reply #6 |
57. "our guys" walk away...and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
freddie mertz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-06-09 11:45 AM Response to Reply #2 |
21. They CAVED to Glen Beck, just as they appear to be caving now... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-06-09 11:49 AM Response to Reply #2 |
25. Well, that's true, but if Van Jones had stayed, he probably would've been |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-06-09 12:41 PM Response to Reply #2 |
46. Are you going to contact them about it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Connie_Corleone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-06-09 11:26 AM Response to Original message |
5. The AP is still fighting back. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-06-09 11:28 AM Response to Original message |
8. Yup. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
butterfly77 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-06-09 11:30 AM Response to Original message |
10. That is what has been the media's strategy all along because.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
freddie mertz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-06-09 11:30 AM Response to Original message |
12. I was not encouraged by the Gibbs and Axelrod appearances.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-06-09 11:33 AM Response to Reply #12 |
15. Here, Axelrod has a message for you and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
freddie mertz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-06-09 11:42 AM Response to Reply #15 |
20. His words are weasel words. No insistence, no strength behind them. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-06-09 11:47 AM Response to Reply #20 |
24. Your comment is incoherent drivel. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
freddie mertz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-06-09 04:55 PM Response to Reply #24 |
58. "Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain..." nt. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alcibiades_mystery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-06-09 11:53 AM Response to Reply #12 |
26. But YOu wouldn't be encouraged if the baby Jesus came down and sat on Obama's shoulder |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-06-09 11:58 AM Response to Reply #12 |
28. Katrina Vanden Heuvel was. She said, after hearing Gibbs, she thinks Obama will |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-06-09 12:03 PM Response to Reply #28 |
29. It's clear from some of the reactions to this episode |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-06-09 12:08 PM Response to Reply #29 |
32. Ain't THAT the truth? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Peacetrain (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-06-09 12:38 PM Response to Reply #29 |
43. I have come to the conclusion that we spent too much time out of power |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Windy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-06-09 12:45 PM Response to Reply #12 |
48. You obviously wouldn't be encouraged by anything that was said. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
freddie mertz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-06-09 04:56 PM Response to Reply #48 |
59. Nonsense. I like Obama and want him to succeed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
democracy1st (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-06-09 11:38 AM Response to Original message |
16. this admin isn't ahead of sh.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-06-09 11:53 AM Response to Reply #16 |
27. Thanks for your intelligent input. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flamingdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-06-09 11:38 AM Response to Original message |
17. Stop trashing Obama, start trashing CNN nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flamingdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-06-09 11:39 AM Response to Reply #17 |
19. AND ESPECIALLY AP ... lying sacks of shit nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Peacetrain (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-06-09 12:37 PM Response to Original message |
42. I love it when the media has to eat crow... without salt.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-06-09 12:43 PM Response to Reply #42 |
47. So do I... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mucifer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-06-09 03:29 PM Response to Original message |
56. the media won't talk about the details. They have and will focus on Obama's poll #s and Van Jones |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:27 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC