Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

FACT - The President gave no commitment to a public option, bit did commit TO PAY OR PUNISH

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
grahamhgreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-12-09 08:45 AM
Original message
FACT - The President gave no commitment to a public option, bit did commit TO PAY OR PUNISH
Edited on Sat Sep-12-09 09:07 AM by grahamhgreen
FACT - The President gave no commitment to a public option, bit did commit To mandatory insurance.


THIS IS CODE: IT MEANS TRILLIONS FOR BIG INSURANCE.


The very real possibility exists that we may be forced to buy CHEAP, UNUSABLE private insurance.


THE FINE ONE PAYS UNDER HIS PLAN (HR3200) DOES NOT GO TO YOUR INSURANCE. IT IS PUNISHMENT FOR THE WORKING POOR.

AFTER YOU PAY YOU WILL NOT BE COVERED FOR ANYTHING!



No commitment to bulk drug purchasing.

No way to opt out of your private insurance and get the public if your in a company plan.

You'll be fined 2.5 percent of your yearly salary but still not be covered (according to HR 3200):


"2) SEC. 401. TAX ON INDIVIDUALS WITHOUT ACCEPTABLE HEALTH CARE COVERAGE", should AT A MINIMUM be amended to apply this tax to the persons premiums, and, when paid, should fully cover the person for the next calendar year.

Better yet, just take out our premiums in our payroll taxes for the public option.

This PAY OR PUNISH PROVISION is completely outrageous and unacceptable, IMHO.

Why would we tax the working poor after the fact as a penalty, rather than before the fact to make sure they are covered? It is taxation without remuneration or benefit. In a way it is fining you for simply simply being alive. What this will produce are cheap plans by fly-by-night insurers that meet the legal requirement, but actually pay no benefits.



In essence, the PAY OR PUNISH PROVISION MUST BE CHANGED TO PAY AND PROVIDE, at minimum, or removed



From HR3200:
"SEC. 401. TAX ON INDIVIDUALS WITHOUT ACCEPTABLE HEALTH CARE COVERAGE.
SEC. 59B. TAX ON INDIVIDUALS WITHOUT ACCEPTABLE HEALTH CARE COVERAGE.
`(a) Tax Imposed- In the case of any individual who does not meet the requirements of subsection (d) at any time during the taxable year, there is hereby imposed a tax equal to 2.5 percent of the excess of--
`(1) the taxpayer's modified adjusted gross income for the taxable year, over
`(2) the amount of gross income specified in section 6012(a)(1) with respect to the taxpayer. "
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-12-09 08:49 AM
Response to Original message
1. hr3200 is a big unwieldy thing.
and there is it's fatal flaw --

and of course -- as you can tell from comments here -- moderates want to fix it after it passes.

of course so do the republicans.

good luck with all that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-12-09 09:02 AM
Response to Original message
2. Do you condone theft and shoplifting - taking something for free that others have to pay for?
Do you want health care for all as long as it doesn't cost you a cent to help someone else or even yourself?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bread_and_roses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-12-09 09:09 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Oh, what nonsense that comparison is
Edited on Sat Sep-12-09 09:10 AM by bread_and_roses
If you are a taxpayer, then under a real public option you are "paying your share." And if your wages are so low that you effectively pay no Federal Income Tax (of course, you still pay a multitude of other taxes in the form of fees, sales taxes, etc.)then your coverage is indeed "paid for" by others - as it is in any other civilized country.
edit for sp typo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-12-09 09:11 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
grahamhgreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-12-09 09:14 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. The PAY OR PUNISH PROVISION is theft. It takes peoples money and provides no benefit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grahamhgreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-12-09 09:23 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. Is that not what big insurance does now - steal from the sick & give to the CEO's?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-12-09 09:04 AM
Response to Original message
3. He said "quality, affordable"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grahamhgreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-12-09 09:25 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. What does that mean?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-12-09 09:17 AM
Response to Original message
7. It will be like car insurance if you spread H1N1 your rates go up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ipaint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-12-09 09:34 AM
Response to Original message
8. Not only does it not provide useable benefits as a result of copays and deductibles
It guarantees that any gains made by the working class and working poor to drag themselves out of this depression in the next decade will go directly to private ins. companies. Anyone who is financially subsidized will effectively be working not to get ahead but to pay ins. companies more money for shitty overpriced ins. as they struggle to work their way up the subsidized ladder.

Not only are the ins. corps getting a massive welfare program through subsidies, at least 40 million new customers and counting they get the majority of americans working their behinds off not to get ahead and save a bit but to turn any gains over to ins. companies as a result of reduced subsidies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RBInMaine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-12-09 09:33 PM
Response to Original message
11. I SUPPORT OBAMA'S PLAN 1000% and this is a STUPID circular firing squad post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grahamhgreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-13-09 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #11
17. I disagree. What he said was we MUST give crapsurance companies 30 million new customers, and MAYBE
we get a very weak public option. MAYBE!

That is what he said.

We need to go back to square 1 and hammer through single payer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
masuki bance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-12-09 09:34 PM
Response to Original message
12. bit?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-12-09 09:46 PM
Response to Original message
13. Of course your posit assumes no subsidies for the working poor.
Bogus and disengenuous.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grahamhgreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-13-09 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #13
18. Will ALL of the working poor get subsidies? Unless the answer is yes, I stand by my post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BzaDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-13-09 02:15 AM
Response to Original message
14. What if there were simply a 2.5% tax credit for people who got insurance?
That is exactly the same thing, and we have tax credits for tons of things.

This is aside from the fact that people who are poor will have fully subsidized premiums, and people who are not as poor will still have partially subsidized premiums. People who are not poor but for whom healthcare costs too much will be exempt from the mandate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grahamhgreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-13-09 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #14
19. That works for me, but not PAY OR PUNISH the working poor. Must be PAY AND PROVIDE, if anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
me b zola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-13-09 03:23 AM
Response to Original message
15. I don't recall what time the President gave his speech today
when he clearly came out fighting for the public option. I guess you posted before the speech? :shrug: In any event, I'm sure the video is posted here in the video forum. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-13-09 06:51 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. Is he still saying the public option would only be for a few? I hope not. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
me b zola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-13-09 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #16
21. If it's done correctly...
If that door gets pried open wide enough a few people squeezing through will hold the door open for the rest of us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grahamhgreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-13-09 10:27 AM
Response to Reply #15
20. Oh good - I will check it out. this post started yesterday, or so, although PAY OR PUNISH must go,
Edited on Sun Sep-13-09 10:28 AM by grahamhgreen
IMHO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 11:57 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC