I would like to hear the reason why these Democratic Reps voted against the House Resolution Bill

Don't you,

Dems voting against reprimand Wilson:
Arcuri
Delahunt
Giffords
Hinchey
Hodes
Kucinich
Maffei
Massa
McDermott
Moore (WI)
Taylor
Teague

I am actually appalled by Denis Kucinich voting against this bill.

Why Denis??? :shrug:

Yet he votes nay on even this. For shame.

it's about making sure he knows his place, down boy!

"We need to work together as Republicans and Democrats to craft a bill that seeks to lower costs, increase quality of care, and put families back in control of their health care. In my judgment, it’s time to move on and I do not support this resolution. We should not allow Mr. Wilson’s reckless conduct to overshadow the need to work together to craft a strong health care reform measure that gives Americans lower costs, more choice, and real control in a fiscally responsible fashion.”

http://hodes.house.gov/

This censure has absolutely nothing to do with health care reform. What bullshit.

a new height.

this bill did not have the bite it needed yet these Reps decided to vote against it.
What type of solidarity is this??

Stupid of me to even asked that...I know, should know better. :banghead:

want. they went through this with the stimulus bill!! they watered it down and gave the republicans what they wanted and the republicans STILL voted against it!! the republicans aren't interested in voting for anything... they just want to make sure the bill is shitty and then if it passed, it will be a useless bill and they can say.... see, we told you.... It baffles me why they keep fucking trying to work with people who have no interest in doing anything. bipartisan only works when both sides want to reach the same goal.... the republicans only goal is to make the dems look bad and try to make the dems lose seats. and for some reason the dems keep waling right into that trap. someone had likened it to lucy holding the football and promising charlie brown she wouldn't pull it away this time.... but she ALWAYS pulls it away!!

I'm thankful for Rep. Clyburn and those who voted yes, including the few republicans, stood up for what is right.

"Obama Blasting Dems" when they wanted justice on joe wilson..I would think everyone wants to know why?

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x6545399

I plan on asking my "bluedog" congressman, Michael Arcuri.

I don't see how his statement can be seen as him blasting Dems, besides, he doesn't have to make the
call, he needs to stay out of it and let the Dems fight his corner.

liar.

The left lies to sensationalize..I never thought I would say that until I discovered it on my own.

I was calling out to the so called journalist who twisted his comment as an attack on Dems.
We all know he has to stay above the fray, the man is not stupid...blah... anyway, get
my point....B-)

get your point, HutzB-)

*sputter*

Why would anyone vote against some stupid two-bit totalitarian-wannabee grade school nonsense that is quintessentially anti-American.

That kind of jerk-off neo-Soviet twaddle is what Republicans spent about 90% of their time passing the entire 12 years they held the House. It's what assholes do.

This isn't a fucking monarchy. If someone wants to call the President a liar, so be it.

I've been doing it most of my life.

When the hell did reprimanding someone become something that only occurs in a monarchy? Utter bullshit.

"When the hell did reprimanding someone become something that only occurs in a monarchy?"

Hmmm... did you leave anything out? Let's try this:

"When the hell did reprimanding someone for barking some disrespectful nonsense at the national executive become something that only occurs in a monarchy?"

Throughout history it's fucking quintessential of a monarchy.

But of course I didn't say such things ONLY happen in a monarchy. Such shit happens in all sorts of non-monarchical totalitarian states, Republican-run Congresses and some democracies who prefer, for whatever reason, to maintain some monarchist and/or fascist trappings.

Disrespect for the president is as central to American civilization as popular elections.

a) you think this is always right, which would mark you as some sort of authoritarian nut, or b) you think this is right when a Democrat is president, which would mark you as as some sort of partisan authoritarian nut. Take your pick.

(The fact that the House has a rule doesn't mean a thing in the context of my criticism, BTW. It's is implicit in my critique that I think the rule is anti-American crap... which I do, because I am not an authoritarian nut.

I hope you are not referring to the House because if you are then it is total hogwash and my
guess is you probably hoped no one caught it....What?? Since when?

Oh Well, since Obama became President it is ok to disrespect him as President in the House
of Congress, so you do have a point....:evilgrin:

post.

the sad truth is, you are speaking from a very peculiar spot on your body....Sir.

I wish so much that she whapped him upside the head with a rolled up copy of the constitution, everytime he said something stupid (every sentence). I wished brave Democrats existed in the crowd to shout his ass down, while his lies killed thousands monthly in Iraq and sent the middle-class here packing. I wished then that dissent was alive and well, despite any rules made to suppress it, so that the truth be heard. And I wish today the necessary evil of Wilson making an ass out of himself can be balanced in times of need by Democrats with a backbone speaking for the people.

he has respect for free speech, regardless of how offensive it might be.

when there are more important matters to be working on??

Guess you didn't get the memo that the repubs were sitting that one out.

It would have taken the same amount of time to show up and vote yes.

kind of a cop out.

They should have let it drop and worked on ISSUES.

a position the Republicans took, why not work on ISSHEWS...:rofl: