|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
jenmito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-25-09 01:49 PM Original message |
Rasmussen has Obama's approval 1 point higher than Gallup |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tridim (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-25-09 01:50 PM Response to Original message |
1. It's going to go up at least 5 points by Monday. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-25-09 01:51 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. Who KNOWS. You'd think they would've gone up 5 points after Obama's appearances |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mvd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-25-09 01:53 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. I think after health care gets passed, there will be a jump.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-25-09 01:59 PM Response to Reply #4 |
7. You're probably right... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gman2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-25-09 04:27 PM Response to Reply #2 |
26. We just stopped TWO HUGE terrorist attacks. Domestic, Freeper type. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-25-09 05:49 PM Response to Reply #26 |
32. Strangely, though, we don't hear ANYTHING about it in regards to giving credit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NYC Democrat (234 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-25-09 01:52 PM Response to Original message |
3. Ras has been been much more eratic then gallup recently with variations from 45% to 52% |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-25-09 01:58 PM Response to Reply #3 |
5. I don't agree that it's been "much more erratic" when you look day by day... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jennicut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-25-09 01:59 PM Response to Reply #5 |
6. Not sure...I look at Gallup every day and it seems to fluctuate for no reason |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-25-09 02:03 PM Response to Reply #6 |
10. So do I... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
johnaries (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-25-09 02:49 PM Response to Reply #10 |
20. Ras polls daily, but the published results are a 3-day "rolling" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-25-09 03:03 PM Response to Reply #20 |
23. Good point... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
johnaries (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-25-09 05:23 PM Response to Reply #23 |
27. I have found the same, going back to when Bush was in office. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-25-09 05:47 PM Response to Reply #27 |
31. Yup... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tritsofme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-25-09 06:46 PM Response to Reply #27 |
35. Yep, since he blew it so bad in 2000, the Bush guys must have leaked him the magic |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
johnaries (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-25-09 07:09 PM Response to Reply #35 |
36. What "continued accuracy"? That's my point. They are NOT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tritsofme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-25-09 07:28 PM Response to Reply #36 |
39. Only in fantasyland. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
johnaries (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-25-09 08:06 PM Response to Reply #39 |
45. Actually, yes. But they couldn't rig them enough. But in all seriousness |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Teaser (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-25-09 07:31 PM Response to Reply #6 |
40. it's supposed to do that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mvd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-25-09 02:01 PM Response to Reply #5 |
9. I don't understand, either. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-25-09 02:05 PM Response to Reply #9 |
11. Yeah... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mvd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-25-09 02:11 PM Response to Reply #11 |
15. Thanks, jenmito! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-25-09 02:12 PM Response to Reply #15 |
16. You, too, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigwillq (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-25-09 02:00 PM Response to Original message |
8. Polls go up and down. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-25-09 02:06 PM Response to Reply #8 |
12. I care because supposedly dropping approval numbers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigwillq (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-25-09 03:45 PM Response to Reply #12 |
25. They're going to do that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadBadger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-25-09 02:08 PM Response to Original message |
13. Rasmussen has been in the neighborhood with his approval numbers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-25-09 02:10 PM Response to Reply #13 |
14. True about the disapproval numbers... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tritsofme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-25-09 02:17 PM Response to Original message |
17. Rasmussen has proven his accuracy through numerous election cycles. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-25-09 02:26 PM Response to Reply #17 |
18. That's bull... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tritsofme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-25-09 02:30 PM Response to Reply #18 |
19. That's because he uses likely voters. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
johnaries (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-25-09 07:13 PM Response to Reply #19 |
37. They also weight their samples. It's the weighting that is the most |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Teaser (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-25-09 07:33 PM Response to Reply #19 |
42. and using likely voters this far out is laughed at by most |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tritsofme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-25-09 07:57 PM Response to Reply #42 |
44. When we get right down to it, any polling at this time is laughable. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
quiller4 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-25-09 07:52 PM Response to Reply #19 |
43. Rasmussen's screen for likely voters tends to be too old, too white |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nancy_Thompson (31 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-25-09 02:52 PM Response to Reply #17 |
21. Rasmussen can't be relied on |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-25-09 03:01 PM Response to Reply #21 |
22. I agree... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tritsofme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-25-09 03:33 PM Response to Reply #21 |
24. You can make it personal and ignore good info if you like, but I'm interested in results. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-25-09 05:34 PM Response to Reply #17 |
28. Baloney, pure and simple. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tritsofme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-25-09 05:46 PM Response to Reply #28 |
30. I wouldn't want to have dinner and drinks with the guy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
johnaries (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-25-09 07:17 PM Response to Reply #30 |
38. Only the fraudulent ones! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-25-09 05:54 PM Response to Reply #28 |
33. I was surprised that Matthews used that poll... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Teaser (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-25-09 07:32 PM Response to Reply #17 |
41. Rasmussen works before elections because of their likely boter screen. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Robbins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-25-09 05:44 PM Response to Original message |
29. Polls |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-25-09 05:58 PM Response to Reply #29 |
34. I agree... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri Apr 26th 2024, 03:43 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC