Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Opinion Poll on the Nobel Peace Prize to POTUS

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
TheCoxwain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-09-09 08:39 AM
Original message
Poll question: Opinion Poll on the Nobel Peace Prize to POTUS
Edited on Fri Oct-09-09 08:45 AM by TheCoxwain

I know .. we have varied opinions on this - even in DU ..

So lets count the Ayes and the Nays
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-09-09 08:43 AM
Response to Original message
1. Someday I'll feel bad for all of the anti-Obama people, watching Obama succeed over and over...
But that day is not today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aramchek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-09-09 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #1
15. they just don't get it. they always see schemes and deception.
They just can't accept that Obama is a better man than they will ever be,
and this is the reason he succeeds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheCoxwain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-09-09 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. Amen to that ..
There is an old proverb that says....

"A mans worst enemy is his own jealousy and anger"


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-09-09 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #15
24. Not at all.
I "always" see a center-right hawk that blocks much of the desperately needed changes my country needs, and actively pursues policies that make things worse in many areas.

I also see, unlike too many in my own country and around the world, that waging war is not "peace."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mnhtnbb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-09-09 08:45 AM
Response to Original message
2. The Nobel Peace Prize Committee doesn't make its decision based on DU opinion
Edited on Fri Oct-09-09 08:45 AM by mnhtnbb
which might surprise a lot of people who think they have all the answers here.

Kudos to the Committee for acknowledging the major change in policy direction from the time of Bush/Cheney
to now.

I also congratulate the Committee for the unmistakable slap in the face of Bushie boy.

There is a world out there and the US is one part of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigwillq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-09-09 08:48 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. Who said it did?
:shrug: Can we not have an opinion? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SacredCow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-09-09 09:07 AM
Response to Reply #2
12. The committee can acknowledge whomever they choose....
I'm pretty much indifferent to their decision. But regarding it as a slap to Republicans, freepers, or Dubya in particular is a bit of a stretch- Since when do any of the aforementioned have any regard for the Nobel Peace Prize, or even the concept of peace? It's like saying they're mad that Jesse Helms was not recognized by the ACLU for his staunch defense of civil rights.

And as for a major change in policy direction from Bush/Cheney- Pakistan might disagree, methinks, what with the drone attacks and all.

Congratulations to Obama, but it was a little premature, IMHO, although I confess that I have absolutely no idea who else was up for it (and I don't care enough to go look).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnyCanuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-09-09 08:46 AM
Response to Original message
3. This overseas blog (an Obama supporter) exactly summarizes my own opinion.
Edited on Fri Oct-09-09 09:01 AM by JohnyCanuck

Barack Obama wins Nobel Peace Prize: Well deserved or too much too soon?

snip

You might want to remember that Barack Obama was nominated for the prize in February of 2009 after serving less than two weeks as President.

As I write this the announcement from Oslo is only an hour old and thus far the overwhelming response from the world has not been congratulations, but puzzlement and concern that the always-politicized Peace Prize has now become even more a political tool designed to influence policy rather than a prestigious award in recognition of efforts that changed the world.

Barbados Free Press declared its backing for Barack Obama and even declared that he would be the next President of the United States when he was still in a run-off with Hillary Clinton in December, 2007, so our view of the award of this Peace Prize is not coloured by negativity towards the President.

We simply see this as too much, too soon. We also believe that the Nobel Prize Committee has again lowered the value of the award with a controversial decision that history may see as foolish. When will the people of the Nobel Prize Committee discover that they cannot predict or control world events?

http://barbadosfreepress.wordpress.com/2009/10/09/barack-obama-wins-nobel-peace-prize-well-deserved-or-too-much-too-soon


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-09-09 09:04 AM
Response to Reply #3
11. Hear, hear!!
As I write this the announcement from Oslo is only an hour old and thus far the overwhelming response from the world has not been congratulations, but puzzlement and concern that the always-politicized Peace Prize has now become even more a political tool designed to influence policy rather than a prestigious award in recognition of efforts that changed the world.

My same sentiments.........

:-(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aramchek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-09-09 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #11
16. they should have given it to Hillary, huh?
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-09-09 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. Nope, she didn't deserve either.
But there were far more deserving people who should have gotten it over Obama.

;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Baltoman991 Donating Member (869 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-09-09 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #19
26. Sure there were
and I'm sure you could rattle off their names right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Umbral Donating Member (969 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-09-09 08:47 AM
Response to Original message
4. But hey! He gives good speech, amazingly good. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-09-09 08:48 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-09-09 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #4
18. i've been watching all the policies trickle down from the president
on myriad policies.

the shift in the way the government is run is unmistakable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bullet1987 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-09-09 08:47 AM
Response to Original message
5. I love the fact that he's won
But I personally think the award should be given to people who have already accomplished something, and not people TRYING to accomplish something. There are many idealists and moralists out there who are trying to make the world a better place, should all those thousands of people be given the Nobel? I don't think it's undeserved, just a little early. I hope he accepts it though and gives a major speech over there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-09-09 08:48 AM
Response to Original message
8. A few years down the line, maybe..........
To give it to Obama now just proves that the whole thing is a sham. There are far more deserving people who have fought for years against repression and for peace in their countries. Some have been imprisoned and even tortured.

And the Nobel Committee decides to award it to Obama????? For having achieved WHAT????

:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-09-09 08:54 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. But few can come in and totally shake things up like a new US President can.
Obama is trying to change the attitude of the rest of the way the rest of the world sees us. We forget how much damage Bush did. Obama has mended fences with the French, got rid of the stupid missile system in Poland and is on better terms with Russia, has everyone working together on Iran instead of going it alone, attempted with one speech to the Arab world to appeal to the moderates in those countries. It is not really an award to just Obama in my opinion but all those who craved and wanted diplomacy to take center stage again...people like John Kerry. People like Hillary. Really, the Dems wanted diplomacy again and wanted to work with the world again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-09-09 09:03 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. If they are just going to be handing awards willy nilly, Kerry is far more deserving of it.
Edited on Fri Oct-09-09 09:05 AM by Beacool
Not only are there other people more deserving, these people could have used the funds to continue to finance their cause.

I have no problem with Obama, or anyone else for that matter, winning if they had EARNED it. Obama has not at this point in time.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheCoxwain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-09-09 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #10
14. BOOOOOOOOO...


This Award is only for Republicans ...Dontchaknow?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phx_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-09-09 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #14
23. lol. Allow me join you. BOOOOOOOOOO!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-09-09 09:12 AM
Response to Original message
13. Peace is a work in progress.
I do not agree with all that Obama is doing, but I agree with the Nobel Committee that he is trying to make a positive change in the right direction. Even while continuing two wars I disagree with, the administration's efforts to reach out to the muslim world and to revitalize nuclear disarmament as a cornerstone of non-proliferation are rightly recognized by this award. We here should all celebrate this honor. Besides, the assplosions from the other side should be spectacular.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-09-09 12:43 PM
Response to Original message
20. You gotta admit, it's a pretty surprising award
But I'm happy for us that our president won it. I'm happy we have a president who's even remotely capable of winning it.

But mostly, I'm happy thinking about the acute sphincter cramps it's inducing in the right wingers.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hawkowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-09-09 12:53 PM
Response to Original message
21. The American People won
I think that the Nobel committee wanted to recognize the American people in electing Obama and adopting the President's campaign message of "hope" and "change". You can't a Nobel prize to an entire country, but you can award it to the country's head of state; i.e; President Obama. In this sense he absolutely deserves it and I, despite my constant criticism of Obama, am happy for him as well as our entire country.

I also am proud and impressed that Obama hit the nail on the head when he said today that the peace prize is "a call to action". I fervently hope President Obama can end our two wars and accelerate peace initiatives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freddie mertz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-09-09 02:13 PM
Response to Original message
22. I think it is a good thing, but also probably premature
It's good because it shows just how much this president has elevated opinion regarding America in the world.

It's premature because so many initiatives are just getting started.

I am happy for us as a nation however, don't get me wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheKentuckian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-09-09 03:48 PM
Response to Original message
25. Other: An overreach but fail to grasp the rage and need to attack Obama
when he didn't award it to himself. I see it as kind of an Oscar type thing, in other words tastes play a huge part but everyone pretends otherwise.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Baltoman991 Donating Member (869 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-09-09 04:22 PM
Response to Original message
27. How sad it is
that the same few who were high fiving after the failed Olympic bid are now once again pissing and moaning about something that makes not only Obama look good, but our damn country looks good.

The Olympics would have given our men and women competing the pride and happiness to perform in front of their home crowd but some here couldn't get past their disdain for Obama so they said fuck the athletes.

And here we are again, something that makes the United States a proud country again is pissed on by the same group because of their hatred for all things Obama.

This is an award each and every one of us should be proud of. Our country is on it's way back yet some here can't see past their noses at that fact.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 09:53 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC