Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

President Obama pushes for Consumer Financial Protection Agency, regulatory reform

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-09-09 04:47 PM
Original message
President Obama pushes for Consumer Financial Protection Agency, regulatory reform
FRI, OCTOBER 9, 4:34 PM EST

"Restoring a Sense of Responsibility from Wall Street to Washington"

Posted by Jesse Lee

Today the President pushed one of the core pillars of his vision of a new economic foundation back to the fore. Reforming our financial system and restoring common sense regulation and oversight is the only way to ensure that the economic catastrophe that began a year ago never returns. Having met just before with those suffering as a result of abuse, fraud, and deception at the hands of financial institutions, the need was never more evident.

This morning we launched a new page dedicated to this initiative, including a video from Austan Goolsbee of the Council of Economic Advisers laying out what's in it for you, and let there be no doubt that there will be a sustained focus on this issue from the White House as the President’s plan goes through Congress.

As for the special interests who are already gearing up to fight this as hard, if not harder than insurance companies have fought health reform, the President made clear he is ready for the fight:

more


REMARKS BY THE PRESIDENT ON CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION

East Room

2:37 P.M. EDT

THE PRESIDENT: Patricia, thank you so much for sharing your story, and doing such a wonderful job. Good afternoon, everybody.

Before I start with my remarks I want to acknowledge some people who've been working diligently on this issue, in some cases for years. First of all, our Secretary of the Treasury, Tim Geithner is here. Christina Romer, the Chair of -- there she is -- of my Council of Economic Advisers, is here. Senator Danny Akaka from Hawaii; Representative Steve Driehaus of Ohio; Representative Walt Minnick of Idaho; Representative Paul Kanjorski of Pennsylvania; Representative Al Green of Texas. Karen Mills, our outstanding Administrator of the Small Business Administration; Sheila Bair, who's been doing a heroic job trying to deal with the banking situation as Chairman of the FDIC; Mayor Michael Nutter of Philadelphia; and my National Economic Advisor, Larry Summers.

And finally, we've got some special guests, some of the finest attorney generals who are fighting against consumer fraud and have been dealing with some of the consequences of the issues that we're discussing here today -- I'm proud to have them here: My former seatmate in the Illinois State Senate, Attorney General Lisa Madigan; Andrew Cuomo of New York; Martha Coakley of Massachusetts; and Roy Cooper of North Carolina. Please give them all a big round of applause. (Applause.)

Now, for the last several months, this administration has been working with Congress to reform an outdated system of financial regulations and lax oversight that helped lead to last year's crisis. And I want to thank some people here who are working tirelessly on this issue -- first of all, Chairman Chris Dodd of the Senate Banking Committee, Chairman Barney Frank of the House Financial Services Committee, Richard Shelby, also of the Senate Banking Committee -- for the leadership and enthusiasm that they have shown throughout this process.

Part of our reform effort involves putting in place new safeguards that would help prevent the irresponsibility and recklessness of a few from wreaking havoc on our entire financial system. We want to close gaps in regulation; we want to eliminate overlap; and we want to set rules of the road for Wall Street that make fair dealing and honest competition the only way for financial firms to win and prosper.

But a central part of our reform effort is also aimed at protecting Americans who buy financial products and services every day -- from mortgages to credit cards. It's true that the crisis we faced was caused in part by people who took on too much debt and took out loans they couldn't afford. But my concern are the millions of Americans who behaved responsibly and yet still found themselves in jeopardy because of the predatory practices of some in the financial industry. These are folks who signed contracts they didn't always understand offered by lenders who didn't always tell the truth. They were lured in by promises of low payments, and never made aware of the fine print and hidden fees.

Secretary Geithner and I just finished meeting with some of these Americans who've joined us here today. And you've already heard from Patricia, who was forced to pay thousands of dollars in interest on a $550 payday loan. And we also had a chance to hear from Susan Chapman, who had excellent payment history until she was contacted by a broker who told her that she could lower the monthly payments on her mortgage. Instead, the loan they sold her ended up increasing her debt, and her principal has now gone up $20,000.

We talked to Karen Cappuccio, who is still fending off foreclosure because her mortgage company duped her into taking out two expensive loans when they had originally promised her one low, fixed-rate mortgage. We talked to Maxine Given, whose bank hit her with four separate overdraft charges because of one mortgage check that they ended up rejecting the very next day. And I should add, by the way, that this is a CPA that we're talking to here. So if it's happening to her, if it's happening to Maxine, then imagine what the rest of us who can barely add are dealing with here. We talked to Andrew Giordano, whose bank made a mistake that cost him $800 in overdraft fees. And when he caught their mistake, the bank only refunded part of the fees.

As we've seen over the last year, abuses like these don't just jeopardize the financial well-being of individual Americans -- they can threaten the stability of the entire economy. And yet, the patchwork system of regulations we have now has failed to prevent these abuses. With seven different federal agencies each having a role, there's too little accountability, there are too many loopholes, and no single agency whose sole job it is to stand up for people like Patricia, Susan, Maxine, Andrew and Karen -- no one whose chief responsibility it is to stand up for the American consumer, and for responsible banks and financial institutions who are having to compete against folks who are not responsible.

So under the reforms we've proposed, that will change. The new Consumer Financial Protection Agency that I've asked Congress to create will have just one mission: to look out for the financial interests of ordinary Americans. It will be charged with setting clear rules of the road for consumers and banks, and it will be able to enforce those rules across the board.

This agency will have the power to make certain that consumers get information that is clear and concise -- in plain language -- so they can compare products and know exactly what they're getting themselves into. It will ensure that banks and other firms can't hide behind these ridiculously confusing contracts -- pages and pages of fine print that nobody can figure out. It will have the ability to enforce and build on the credit card reforms we passed earlier this year, so that consumers aren't hit with unfair rate hikes and penalties, or hidden charges. It will require brokers to look out for the interests of families if they give advice about mortgages. And it will ensure transparency and fair dealing for other financial products, like bank overdraft services and payday loans.

In a financial system that's never been more complicated, it has never been more important to have a watchdog function like the one we've proposed. And yet, predictably, a lot of the banks and big financial firms don't like the idea of a consumer agency very much. In fact, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce is spending millions on an ad campaign to kill it. You might have seen some of these ads -- the ones that claim that local butchers and other small businesses somehow will be harmed by this agency. This is, of course, completely false -- and we've made clear that only businesses that offer financial services would be affected by this agency. I don't know how many of your butchers are offering financial services. (Laughter.)

Contrary to what some have argued, this agency would not restrict consumer choice and innovation. Nothing could be further from the truth. In the past, a lack of clear rules led to innovation of the wrong kind: The firms that did best were the ones who did the best job of hiding the real cost to consumers. We don't want them competing by figuring out how much they can fool ordinary Americans. By contrast, the consumer agency we're proposing would set ground rules so that firms don't have to compete to confuse families, but they have to compete to give them better choices. This will also help small business entrepreneurs who often rely on credit cards and home equity loans to finance their start-up businesses.

All this hasn't stopped the big financial firms and their lobbyists from mobilizing against change. They're doing what they always do -- descending on Congress, using every bit of influence they have to maintain the status quo that has maximized their profits at the expense of American consumers, despite the fact that recently a whole bunch of those same American consumers bailed them out as a consequence of the bad decisions that they made. And since they're worried they may not be able to kill this agency, they're trying their hardest to weaken it -- by asking for exemptions from this agency's rules and enforcement; by fighting to keep every gap and loophole they can find.

They're very good at this, because that's how business has been done in Washington for a very long time. In fact, over the last 10 years, the Chamber alone spent nearly half a billion dollars on lobbying -- half a billion dollars.

The stories we heard today, they remind us that the American people can't afford business as usual any longer. These Americans can't afford high-priced lobbyists to argue their case. They're counting on us to be their advocates, to be their voice, to restore a sense of responsibility from Wall Street to Washington. That's why we need a Consumer Financial Protection Agency that will stand up not for big banks, not for financial firms, but for hardworking Americans. (Applause.) That's why we need regulatory reform that will reward innovation and competition instead of short-cuts and abuses. That's why we can't let special interests win this fight.

We've already seen and lived the consequences of what happens when there's too little accountability on Wall Street and too little protection for Main Street, and I will not allow this country to go back there. It is time for us to move forward. It is time for real change. And I'm confident that we're going to get it done, with the help of all the people who are here today, and, most importantly, with the help of the American people, who are going to demand a better deal from their financial services.

Thank you very much, everybody. (Applause.)



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-09-09 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
1. Wasn't there a post a few days back where the poster said Obama should have pushed...
for so and so protection for citizens. It seems that he did push for protection but Bluedogs through that out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robo50 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-09-09 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Did you mean "threw"?
Please try to post using words spelled correctly, you will gain so much more argumentative force doing so.

I am kind of sick of people who can't use spell checker, or know the difference between "through" and "threw"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JTFrog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-09-09 05:38 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Let's hope the grammer and punctuation police don't come after you.
Edited on Fri Oct-09-09 05:39 PM by JTFrog
I've read your posts.

Glass houses and all that....

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robo50 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-09-09 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Yeah, right, I am perfect, and my posts are perfect.....you "no" that!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Please, stop trying to be the spelling police and stop publicly reporting your findings of my imperfections and lawbreaking without showing me a
warrant for my arrest for my crimes.

Through, versus threw...............big fucking difference, anyone who finished 8th grade would know this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JTFrog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-09-09 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Please stop trying to be the spelling police?
Exactly.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robo50 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-09-09 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. By the way, you mis-spelled "grammar" not "grammer"!
Just in case you wanted to be perfect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JTFrog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-09-09 05:52 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. You might want to unwad your panties. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robo50 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-09-09 06:17 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Another disgusting Democrat who is "holier than thou", and ready for the
Edited on Fri Oct-09-09 06:18 PM by robo50
ignore button.
Make your mistakes, or correct your posts with spell check.........I really don't care... but polite always wins out over proper spellings. Sorry you fail at both.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JTFrog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-09-09 06:21 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. You obviously have zero concept of hypocrisy.
I'm pretty sure post #3 came before any of my replies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robo50 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-09-09 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. What's your problem with someone asking people to PLEASE fix?
If I were smoking a cigar in your home would you ask me to PLEASE put it out?

Or would you insult me, without asking with a PLEASE.

I am polite, I am an almost perfect speller, (you, not so much...e.g. "grammer")

Advice :: When you want to accuse people of being hypocritical, do it while looking in a mirror.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JTFrog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-09-09 06:40 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. "I am kind of sick of people who can't use spell checker, or know the difference.."
Edited on Fri Oct-09-09 06:47 PM by JTFrog
Fucking real polite.

Zero concept of hypocrisy.

*On Edit - For all your self-proclaimed "perfect spelling" you consistently suck at punctuation and proper capitalization. I just wanted to point it out because you jumped into this thread as an holier than thou panties in a wad hypocrite.

Yea, I don't speel so gud. But I relly dunt care.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JeffR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-09-09 05:10 PM
Response to Original message
2. But... but... but...
I read somewhere that he's nothing but a center-right corporate sell-out shill.

Where did I read that? Hmm... Oh yeah, it was on DU.

Now I'm just like totally conflicted.
:crazy:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 09:33 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC