Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama won the Nobel Peace Prize for Repudiating the Bush/Cheney Doctrine

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
steven johnson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-09-09 10:28 PM
Original message
Obama won the Nobel Peace Prize for Repudiating the Bush/Cheney Doctrine
Edited on Fri Oct-09-09 10:32 PM by steven johnson
I agree with the commentators who felt the Nobel Committee gave President Obama the Nobel Prize for Peace because he separated himself from the Bush/Cheney Doctrine of preemptive war. Additionally, he promoted multilateralism and a different American Exceptionalism from George W. Bush. Obama's American Exceptionalism was different from Reagan's "shining city on a hill" and more to the idea that every country was exceptional. In other words, the Nobel Committee thought that Obama wasn't the threat to world peace that George W. Bush turned out to be.

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2009/10/9/161444/871

http://swampland.blogs.time.com/2009/04/04/obama-too-is-an-american-exceptionalist/



Preemptive war has always been regarded as OK: if you see an enemy massing its troops at the border, entering the launch codes on its missiles, and so forth, you do not have to wait until that enemy actually strikes. Preventive war, by contrast, has not generally been regarded as OK. Nonetheless, it's one of the pillars of the "Bush Doctrine":

I should say, at the outset, that I have not read every interview Obama has given, and so there may be statements that are clearer than the ones I've found. That said, the clearest one I know of is from The Audacity of Hope (pp. 308-9). Having said that the United States has the unilateral right to defend itself against an actual attack, he writes:


"I would also argue that we have the right to take unilateral military action to eliminate an imminent threat to our security -- so long as an imminent threat is understood to be a nation, group, or individual that is actively preparing to strike U.S. targets (or allies with which the United States has mutual defense agreements), and has or will have the means to do so in the immediate future. Al Qaeda qualifies under this standard, and we can and should carry out strikes against them wherever we can. Iraq under Saddam Hussein did not meet this standard, which is why our invasion was such a strategic blunder." (Emphasis in text.)

As far as I can tell, this is a way of saying: I support preemptive war but not preventive war, without using those terms (which are technical and unnecessary in this context.) Obama supports a right to anticipatory self-defense that is restricted to imminent threats by an enemy who is actively preparing to strike, and either has the capacity to do so or will have it in the immediate future. It therefore does not include more speculative threats, like Iraq before the war.

Obama On Preventive War




The Nobel Committee said, in part:

Obama has as President created a new climate in international politics. Multilateral diplomacy has regained a central position, with emphasis on the role that the United Nations and other international institutions can play. Dialogue and negotiations are preferred as instruments for resolving even the most difficult international conflicts. The vision of a world free from nuclear arms has powerfully stimulated disarmament and arms control negotiations. Thanks to Obama's initiative, the United States is now playing a more constructive role in meeting the great climatic challenges the world is confronting. Democracy and human rights are to be strengthened.

Nobel Committee Announcement

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Elmore Furth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-09-09 11:34 PM
Response to Original message
1. Alfred Nobel listed the qualifications for the prize -- Obama seems to fit them

According to Nobel's will, the Peace Prize should be awarded "to the person who shall have done the most or the best work for fraternity between nations, for the abolition or reduction of standing armies and for the holding and promotion of peace congresses."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nobel_Peace_Prize

"I don't oppose all wars. What I am opposed to is a dumb war. What I am opposed to is a rash war."
Barack Obama

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 03:14 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC