There is a difference between thinking the Obama's Nobel Prize was premature and the vitriol . . .
. . .from the haters.
I think it is fair of anyone to believe that it is too premature to award Obama the Nobel Peace Prize, however there is a difference between folks think it was undeserved or too soon and thos who are using this occasion to attack him over it.
2. yup, and if one listens to the reasons by the Nobel Committee
you can see why he got it. they didn't give it to him for something he hasn't done. you may still not agree that he should have got it, but their reasons had to do with things he has done.
remember when idiots asked what Gore's work on the environment had to do with peace. and same idiots complained about Carter getting it.
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.