Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Senate may raise physicians’ Medicare payment fees- (a carrot for the PO?)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
SpartanDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 11:02 PM
Original message
Senate may raise physicians’ Medicare payment fees- (a carrot for the PO?)
Edited on Wed Oct-14-09 11:04 PM by SpartanDem
A number of Dems that represent rural states/districts have opposed the public option specifically one tied to Medicare, because they say the current formula screws over their doctors and hospitals. Kent Conrad voiced this very concern during the markup I wonder if this is the thing that could put the public option over the hump?




The Senate is poised to take action on a costly bill to hike Medicare payments to physicians just weeks before bringing a sweeping healthcare overhaul to the floor.

Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) on Wednesday morning quietly set in motion legislation that could cost more than $200 billion over 10 years – without cuts or revenue to offset the spending -- on a separate track from a larger healthcare bill that President Barack Obama and Senate Democratic leaders have vowed would not add to the budget deficit.

“This is a bill that would permanently change the payment system for physicians to a fairer system,” Sen. Debbie Stabenow (D-Mich.) said on the Senate floor as she introduced the bill Tuesday evening. “It does have a cost to it,” she acknowledged.

Next year, without congressional intervention, Medicare’s fees to physicians would drop by 21 percent. In addition to their desire to prevent those cuts, Democrats are eager to win the support of physicians for healthcare reform. The American Medical Association (AMA) has already endorsed the House healthcare reform bill, which contains a $245 billion payment fix.

http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/63141-senate-eyes-hike-to-physicians-medicare-fees-
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 11:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. A way to get the rural state Dem votes for the PO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrToast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 11:34 PM
Response to Original message
2. So HR 3200 already fixes the problem?
Is that how Baucus made his bill cheaper?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jeanpalmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-15-09 12:05 AM
Response to Original message
3. Where does that leave Baucus' bill
which funds subsidies for mandated insurance with $400 billion in cuts from Medicare. Looks like they're going to take $400 billion with the right hand and give back $200 billion with the left. Interesting sleight of hand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-15-09 12:16 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. I hope it gets rid of mandates.
Opens the door for better PO. Basically it replaces mandates with this would be the same thing without the health insurance agency making the higher wage though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpartanDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-15-09 10:58 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. The cuts are just to Medicare Advantage
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
backscatter712 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-15-09 12:37 AM
Response to Original message
5. Fixing this problem will remove Kent Conrad's current excuse for opposing the PO.
Right now, he's complaining that doctors in N. Dakota are being shafted by Medicare, and if the PO reimbursements are based on Medicare, he'll vote against it.

The reimbursements are a real problem - doctors really should be getting paid more for their services, and that's an easily fixable problem.

I say fix it, raise the reimbursements, restructure these payments, then dare Conrad to find another excuse to oppose the bill once it comes up for a floor vote...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ej510 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-15-09 11:04 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. He already has another excuse lined up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 11:19 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC