Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Congressional leaders signaling move to repeal DADT

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
SpartanDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-17-09 02:49 PM
Original message
Congressional leaders signaling move to repeal DADT
Edited on Sat Oct-17-09 02:59 PM by SpartanDem
I don't see any problem getting votes in the Senate, the hate crime bill got 63 votes and IMO that's a more controversial issue, because you can at least make a philosophical argument against hate crime laws(i.e all crimes are hate crime). I certainly expect to get the senators from Maine vote in any DADT bill



Congressional leaders signaling move to repeal 'Don't ask, don't tell' policy
By Eric Zimmermann and Tony Romm - 10/16/09 03:14 PM ET

Congress could move early next year to repeal the "Don’t ask, don’t tell" policy on gays serving in the military.

The move would play to the liberal base of President Barack Obama’s administration, but could pose risks by introducing a controversial issue into an election year in which Democrats are wary of losing seats, particularly in the House

In the Senate, White House advisers have directly discussed repealing the law with Sen. Joe Lieberman (I-Conn.), a key member of his chamber's Armed Services Committee. Lieberman, a hawk on defense, is a staunch opponent of "Don’t ask, don’t tell," and his support could prove influential in winning centrist votes.

Lieberman's office has confirmed the discussions took place but did not provide further details.

Rep. Barney Frank (D-Mass.), a leading proponent of gay rights and close ally of Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), earlier this week predicted the House would move on the issue.

“Early next year we will be moving on ‘Don't ask, don’t tell,’ ” Frank told Headline News.

http://thehill.com/homenews/house/63511-congressional-leaders-signaling-move-to-repeal-dont-ask-dont-tell-policy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Davis_X_Machina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-17-09 03:05 PM
Response to Original message
1. Right after a House election...
Edited on Sat Oct-17-09 03:10 PM by Davis_X_Machina
....where the Democratic majority is inflated by a number of purple seats won in the '08 blowout.

Hang on to as many of them as possible, Then, repeal.

Barney's been at this game a long, long time. I'd listen to him.

Of course, an an alternative, Aravosis-centered universe, this isn't happening, can't happen and when it does, Obama will veto it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neecy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-17-09 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. brilliant
Yes, let's put our civil rights off for another year...or two....no skin off of your nose.

This isn't terribly controversial. The public overwhelmingly supports repeal by a wide margin. They'd actually be doing something that would win approval, so no need to throw us aside (the usual Democratic response).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Davis_X_Machina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-17-09 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. You want a 223-212 House?
That'll do you a world of good on everything except the military issue -- DOMA, EDNA, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neecy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-17-09 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. And you would really blame us for that?
As I said, this has the overwhelming support of the public. Please tell me again why repealing DADT in January would be so scary 'n controversial, and cause us to lose a massive number of House seats.

I can see this one coming down the tracks - the homos will get blamed for everything. The economy sucks, jobs suck, the banks have been allowed to loot the Treasury but it'll be those goddamn homos and their "agenda" that sinks us.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-17-09 03:08 PM
Response to Original message
2. Good. This is the way it's supposed to work.
If Congress wants to get something done, they should do it, instead of complaining about the President not doing it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-17-09 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Yes, President Obama has explained
this and now it's happening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 02:27 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC