Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Eugene Robinson: A Record You Can Believe In

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-03-09 07:00 AM
Original message
Eugene Robinson: A Record You Can Believe In
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2009/11/03/a_record_you_can_believe_in_98992.html

A Record You Can Believe In
By Eugene Robinson


WASHINGTON -- It's been a year since a healthy majority of American voters elected Barack Obama to change the world. Which is precisely what he's doing.

Like many people who desperately want to see the country take a more progressive course, I quibble and quarrel with some of President Obama's actions. I wish he'd been tougher on Wall Street, quicker to close Guantanamo, more willing to investigate Bush-era excesses, bolder in seeking truly universal health care. I wish he could summon more of the rhetorical magic that spoke so compellingly to the better angels of our nature.

But he's a president, not a Hollywood action hero. Most of my frustration is really with the process of getting anything done in Washington, which is not something Obama can unilaterally change, nimbly circumvent or blithely ignore. One thing the new administration clearly did not anticipate was that Republicans in Congress would be so consistently and unanimously obstructionist -- or that Democrats would have to be introduced to the alien concept of party discipline. It took the White House too long to realize that bipartisanship is a tango and that there's no point in dancing alone.

Step back for a moment, though, and look at Obama's record so far. His biggest accomplishment has been keeping the worst financial and economic crisis in decades from turning into another Great Depression. Yes, the $787 billion stimulus package was messy, but most economists believe it was absolutely necessary -- and some believe it should have been even bigger. Yes, Obama continued the Bush-era policy of showering irresponsible financial institutions with billions in public funds. Yes, the administration bailed out the auto industry -- and we actually heard the president of the United States reassure Americans that General Motors warranties would be honored.

But these and other actions convinced the financial markets that the White House would do anything to avoid a complete meltdown. The economy grew at a rate of 3.5 percent in the third quarter and, while unemployment may not yet have peaked, the odds of a strong and fairly swift recovery have greatly improved.

Responding to the crisis required creating an enormous fiscal deficit that Obama will spend years trying to cut down to size. But not even the most conservative economists recommend attacking the deficit before the economy is stabilized on a path of growth. Only Republican demagogues think that's a good idea.

On national security, Obama moved at once to categorically renounce torture -- a big step toward removing the ugly stain that George W. Bush and Dick Cheney left on our national honor. It looks as if Obama will miss his self-imposed one-year deadline for closing the Guantanamo prison, but a delay of a few weeks or months will be worth it if the administration succeeds in developing a comprehensive legal framework -- consistent with our ideals and traditions -- for bringing terrorism suspects to justice.

Obama should have supported a full-blown investigation into apparent Bush-era violations of national and international law. And, at a minimum, he should allow the limited torture probe ordered by Attorney General Eric Holder to follow the evidence wherever it might lead.

But at least the administration is on schedule in withdrawing combat troops from Iraq. I don't think Obama knows the right answer on Afghanistan; I'm not sure anybody does.

Obama's months in office have been so action-packed that it's easy to forget some of the historic steps he has taken: Nominating Justice Sonia Sotomayor, the first Hispanic, to the Supreme Court. Going to Egypt and speaking directly to the Muslim world about cooperation rather than conflict. Embracing multilateralism as the template for U.S. foreign policy in the new century. Accepting the scientific consensus on climate change. Investing in "green" jobs and education reform as key engines of economic development.

And then there's health care reform. I've been impatient with Obama's strategy of letting Congress take the lead on writing legislation, but he's brought us to the brink of truly meaningful reform much faster than anyone could have imagined a year ago. We still have some fighting to do over two words -- "public" and "option" -- but it looks clear that the principle that everyone is entitled to health insurance, a Democratic Party goal for at least six decades, is about to become law.

Quite a record for 287 days: All that, and a Nobel Peace Prize, too.
Refresh | +92 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
jaxx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-03-09 07:07 AM
Response to Original message
1. Gene Robinson gets it.
There is a common sense to his writing that always leaves me with a bit of a smile.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
lunatica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-03-09 07:15 AM
Response to Original message
2. Obama is certainly deep in the trial by fire experience
I have to also cut him some slack because I think the difficult times we live in will forge his Presidency. I think the times of FDR's administration forged his. I think the mettle of a person must be measured by their legacy after they've done their job, not by onlookers long on criticism and short on pitching in with a mob.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-03-09 07:19 AM
Response to Original message
3. Good and fair article. Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-03-09 08:34 AM
Response to Original message
4. What does Bro. Eugene think the Pres. could have done differently about Gitmo?
I like Eugene, so his opinion is very important to me. Gitmo is perhaps the ONE thing the President will receive a lot of flack over to which there were the most obstacles. I mean, one can make an argument that that the stimulus wasn't big enough, he had direct control over that .... but it's not like he can FORCE the prisoners to go to other countries or FORCE state side prisons to take them. (At least until now.)

I wonder what Eugene thinks that the President should have done differently. I need to go a'Googling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-03-09 08:37 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. I didn't take Robinson's words as a criticism of the President
concerning Gitmo; maybe the fact that he set a deadline that probably won't be met could be considered mild criticism. I blame that on all the asshats who couldn't possibly accept scary terraists in state-side max. security prisons, places from where no one has ever escaped.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-03-09 08:45 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. But, and let me say again, I LOVE Eugene......
.... he prob. should have left that out of the argument. lol

I mean, I realize a writer has to address both sides of an argument, but I wish he would not have included that one. You and I both know the President ordered it closed on like day two and MOST other men/women who had just been sworn in would not have done that. It was a very ballsy thing to do even within the Democratic party. This "controversy" over not closing it by the deadline (if that is what happens) is perhaps one of the most manufactured controversies of his admin and it bothers me that Eugene brought it up.

Like I said, I'm going to see if Eugene has addressed the matter more fully somewhere else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Fedja Donating Member (544 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-04-09 02:45 AM
Response to Reply #6
23. I disagree
The day I see Eugene argue one side of an argument rather than state his opinion honestly is the day I stop listening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Kind of Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-03-09 08:46 AM
Response to Original message
7. Well, done. Continue to support Obama and review him
fairly.
KnR
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-03-09 09:38 AM
Response to Original message
8. Good critique
High expectations tempered with a realistic view of what he's up against in Congress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
HopeOverFear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-03-09 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
9. Excellent
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
SpartanDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-03-09 02:06 PM
Response to Original message
10. I think Robinson lays it out perfectly
sure they're things that could've been done better or you wish moved faster, but overall it been a very good first year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-03-09 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
11. "All that and a Noble Peace Prize, too"..
Thank you, Eugene Robinson..I'm so appreciative that we were able to have "this year".
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
impik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-03-09 07:48 PM
Response to Original message
12. Lone sane voice
In sea of Left madness.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Lord Helmet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-03-09 07:55 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. +1
there is so much shark jumped crazy shit posted here
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
impik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-03-09 07:59 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Try DK or Huffpost, it's even worse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
me b zola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-03-09 07:53 PM
Response to Original message
13. K&R
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Solomon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-03-09 08:17 PM
Response to Original message
16. Spot on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
RainDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-03-09 08:59 PM
Response to Original message
17. great article. bookmarked this and the list on GD
...to remind myself on those days when I'm feeling down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
GreenArrow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-03-09 09:40 PM
Response to Original message
18. "it looks clear that the principle ...
that everyone is entitled to health insurance, a Democratic Party goal for at least six decades, is about to become law."

If the "principle" that everyone is entitled to "health insurance" is the best the Democratic Party can do, then, words fail me.

Overall, it's a fair minded assesment, but that last paragraph just kills me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
AusDem Donating Member (219 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-04-09 06:53 AM
Response to Reply #18
26. yes, but when 40% of those charged with
governing the country don't even agree to that principle, things become a little harder. the principle is where it all starts, hopefully the implementation won't be a total failure, and give people with no hope, some hope.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
GreenArrow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-04-09 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #26
30. I think you misread me
My complaint is that the focus in on "health insurance" rather than on where it should be, and historically has been, health CARE. Somewhere, somehow, quite recently, the focus changed from one to another, and not for the better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
tblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-03-09 10:30 PM
Response to Original message
19. The president deserves a lot of credit he doesn't often get.
Good for Gene! Laying it out so plainly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
BREMPRO Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-03-09 11:05 PM
Response to Original message
20. a fair assessment - the change is tone is taken for granted now,
and many of his accomplishment have gone unheralded, or overshadowed by the most contentious issues such as Health care and Afghanistan. I like what Obama said on Letterman - that all the problems that come to his desk are the hard problems that no one else can solve easily.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
rury Donating Member (629 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-04-09 01:50 AM
Response to Original message
21. Yes, quite a record...
OBAMA 2012!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Grinchie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-04-09 02:06 AM
Response to Original message
22. I rec'ed this, though I will probably regret it.
I haven't seen anything on the Healt Care front that isn't just more of the same, with a convenient cadre of combatants fighting for entertainment.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-04-09 04:03 AM
Response to Reply #22
24. Just more of the same? Tell that to all the millions of currently uninsurable people
and people who have lost their insurance after developing serious illnesses.

Both of the bills will provide essential relief to these people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Grinchie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-04-09 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #24
27. Have you read the bill yet?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-04-09 05:28 PM
Response to Reply #27
31. No. I read Nancy Pelosi's summary, and her list of the actions
that would take effect immediately.

Have you read the 1900 page bill yet?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Grinchie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-05-09 03:02 AM
Response to Reply #31
35. No I haven't. I'm waiting for the dust to settle and see how America reacts first.
To be honest, I don't expect anything good from it, because I want Universal Healthcare or nothing at all.

We've spent way too much on the Military to be conned into anything less.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
pundaint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-04-09 06:16 AM
Response to Original message
25. Sorry Eugene the kool-aid is looking suspicious to me
Who was president when the $787 billion stimulus package was passed? Reinflating the bubble isn't fixing the problem. economists believe it was absolutely necessary -- and some thought that guaranteeing the mortgages would solve the peoples problem and the banking problem too. But the bankers Obama kept and hired on, found a way to fix the banks, restore the bankers bonuses, and leave the mortgagees holding the bag. Yes, Obama continued the Bush-era policy of showering irresponsible financial institutions with billions in public funds. The economy grew at a rate of 3.5 percent in the third quarter while we continue to produce less intrinsic value.

If it wasn't for the manifest depravity of the Bush administration, denouncing torture would be nothing at all. Has he ended extraordinary rendition? Not exactly. Has he signed an extension of the civil rights usurping Patriot Act? Has he continued the secrecy policies he campaigned against?

Obama should have supported a full-blown investigation into apparent Bush-era violations of national and international law. And, at a minimum, he should allow the limited torture probe ordered by Attorney General Eric Holder to follow the evidence wherever it might lead. Gene is correct here.

How about the right question on Afghanistan: How will we know we're done there?

For real change Obama found middle of the road jurist to offset the radical corporatists appointed by the last guy. Accepting the scientific consensus on climate change? Surely we shouldn't be praising people for simply not being stupid?.

After conspiring to undermine change with Pharma behind closed doors, Obama gave power put in his hands by the voters over to the very party the voters had just taken it away from. The result being enhanced revenues for those standing between the people and world-class health coverage, higher costs for all the payers, and a lot of bullshit about what a fine bill it is. Change doesn't take 1100 pages.

Even McCain would have looked better in many respects than the last guy. Being not Bush might be enough to become president, but is nowhere near enough to be a good and effective president. Just as Bush took that 9/11 unity and wasted it by grabbing for more power via usurpation, Obama has squandered his "I'm Not Bush" unity, trying to gain more power by giving what he promised to his supporters over to his opponents. You're welcome to your faith, but to have trust would be delusional in the face of experience.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-04-09 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #25
29. Everything that you detail show that the
Edited on Wed Nov-04-09 01:42 PM by truedelphi
Master Plan (OR the plan of the Masters') Is working perfectly.

After eight years of Bush, Americans do not want to bother thinking about things. The Nazi torment has ended, and Obama is not only President, he is coherent and personable. These key facts affect the idea that to look deeper is to approve of Bush...

But beneath Obama's facade of Mr Nice Guy, lurks a man who took a 62% voter mandate, a 76% indication that Americans want REAL HEALTH CARE REFORM and then he stalled. He stalled while no one is Congress had one decent strong talking point idea. (Except for Conyer's HR 676, on HCR.)

Instead Obama was all conciliatory -- visiting town hals across the nation and sputtering out such incredibly insipid statements as "Well, uh, the Public Option is only one tool and may not even be in the finalized version."

Meanwhile Geithener and Bernanke continued the Plunder. Geithner asked late on a Friday not too long ago for yet another increase in the nation's debt limit - we had already gone past the last debt limit of twelve tril. (This request got little news coverage.)

What has occurred is an absolute coup. The "Nazis" supposedly have resigned, but keep in mind, they have not fled. The Dems are the New Republicans, except even Nixon would have never allowed the eleven trillion dollar and counting Geithner/Bernanke raid on Main Street.

And most Americans keep kidding themselves. Which is possible to do until you lose your job. Or until the day that will eventually come when the Second Wave of The Crash occurs. This time Main Street is penniless, jobless, and homeless, and there will not be any way at all to restore that resulting Second Crash non-economy!





Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-04-09 11:06 PM
Response to Reply #25
32. Oh yeah, accuse Eugene Robinson of
drinking "koolaid" because he has a view that differs from yours.

Cheap shot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
MyNameGoesHere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-04-09 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
28. But this is stuff i expect a normal
run of the mill Democrat to accomplish. I had higher hopes i guess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-05-09 12:09 AM
Response to Reply #28
33. Your post is ridiculous

"A run of the mill Democrat".


For over 100 years... a time that included 7 Democratic Presidents.... *NO* action was taken on health care reform.

This President is taking it on.


You have no sense of perspective or history.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Gravel Democrat Donating Member (598 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-05-09 02:41 AM
Response to Original message
34. Interesting: "but it looks clear that the principle that everyone is entitled to health insurance,..
"...it looks clear that the principle that everyone is entitled to health insurance, a Democratic Party goal for at least six decades, is about to become law...." Huh?

Apparently I've been hanging around the wrong Democrats because I've never heard that principle

Oh I've heard about the principle of "health care'

And "entitled to health insurance" is a bit different than "mandatory health insurance" as currently proposed

Unless my dictionary is wrong. Mr. Robinson is a smart man and I'm sure he understands the difference.
Confusing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
ellie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-05-09 08:58 AM
Response to Original message
36. kicking
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
LatteLibertine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-05-09 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
37. "But he's a president, not a Hollywood action hero."
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 10:26 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC