Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Transcript Of O'Reilly Interview Suggests A Concise, Powerful Speaker

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
DrFunkenstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-04 11:05 AM
Original message
Transcript Of O'Reilly Interview Suggests A Concise, Powerful Speaker
O’REILLY: According to a poll taken by the Coalition Authority last spring, only five percent of the Iraqi people see the United States as liberators. Are you surprised they don’t appreciate the American sacrifice more?



PRESIDENT BUSH: I, I think they're beginning to, appreciate the sacrifice, because the country is getting better. It’s tougher than heck right now, because Zarqawi and some of these former Baathists are killing innocent Iraqis and killing our soldiers in order to try to get us to leave.

Um, I also saw a poll where it said by far the vast majority of the Iraqis believe the world is getting better. And that's positive. In other words, people are beginning to see progress. Electricity is better, schools are opening, hospitals are running. Um, I think when it’s all said and done, the Iraqis are going to look back and say thank God for America.



O’REILLY: How long is it going to take before that happens, do you think?

PRESIDENT BUSH: You know, it’s uh, as soon as possible. Now, I think the elections are going to have uh, uh you know, a very positive effect, and they take place in January, and, but the people want to vote.



O’REILLY: But can they vote when people are being blown up?

PRESIDENT BUSH: Yeah.

O’REILLY: And these guys are threatening them, then they vote...

PRESIDENT BUSH: That's when you're supposed to vote. You’ve got to stand tough with these terrorists. You cannot allow the terrorists to dictate whether or not a society can be free or not.

Do you remember what happened in Afghanistan when the Taliban pulled the four women off the bus and killed them because they had voter registration cards? I think there had been about three million Afghan citizens who had registered at this point in time. A lot of people said, well, the elections look like they’ve got to be over in Afghanistan, because the Taliban is, too violent to allow the elections to go forward. Today ten million citizens, in that country have registered to vote, forty percent of whom are women, which is a powerful statistic.

O’REILLY: The South Vietnamese didn't fight for their freedom, which is why they don’t have it today.

PRESIDENT BUSH: Yeah.

O’REILLY: Do you think the Iraqis are going to fight for their freedom?

PRESIDENT BUSH: Absolutely.

O’REILLY: You do.

PRESIDENT BUSH: No question in my mind, they will, you bet. I was with Prime Minister Allawi yesterday, he is a tough guy. He is a strong leader. He believes the future of Iraq is the future of freedom, and he tells me that, you know that these places where they go bomb the recruits, the people trying to sign up to serve in the army or the police, the next day, more recruits come.



O’REILLY: Okay.

PRESIDENT BUSH: Because people want to defend their country. I believe that. You know why I believe that, and this is really important, uh, uh, it’s because, I believe everybody yearns to be free. I believe Muslims yearn to be free. And I, and this is tough, look, no question it’s tough times. But if we send mixed signals, if we waver, the times will be tougher. That's what the terrorists are watching, they're watching us like hawks.

O’REILLY: What happened to Saddam’s chemical arsenal, do you know?

PRESIDENT BUSH: No. I don’t. We thought we’d have stockpiles, uh, we do know he had the capability of making weapons. And that capability could have been passed on to terrorists, and that was a risk, after 9/11, we could not afford to take.

O’REILLY: No I understand that. But you, to this day, don’t know what happened to his chemical weapons. He didn't tell us, and, and,

PRESIDENT BUSH: No. Not yet.

O’REILLY: He hasn’t given us much, has he?

PRESIDENT BUSH: No, he, well he doesn’t have anything, you know, doesn’t have anything to, to gain by giving us much, I mean, he’s, he’s going to go on trial, and the Iraqis will lay out a case, and, you know, I mean, why would he, why would he tell the truth?

O’REILLY: “The Wall Street Journal” says, and that's a conservative paper, that uh, the Defense Department and the Pentagon wasn’t aggressive enough in getting al-Sadr and then crushing Fallujah.

PRESIDENT BUSH: Yeah.

O’REILLY: Is the “Journal” wrong?

PRESIDENT BUSH: I, I think this uh, I think that the, government of Iraq, Allawi, did a good job in Najaf with Sadr. In other words, they now control the shrines, and they did so in a way that he, Allawi, thought would be best for the political process.



In other words, there's a dual track here. There's a political process going forward, and a security operation going forward. And the two must be parallel, and uh, Allawi made the decision that the best operation in Najaf uh would be to, the way we handled it, and uh, if they're saying that maybe last fall we should have moved on Sadr, it’s a judgment call that you know, history will have to look back on.

O’REILLY: Fallujah? Should we have crushed it when we could have?

PRESIDENT BUSH: Well, there again, there was a dual track with uh, a political process going forward, a lot of people on the ground there thought that if we’d have gone into Fallujah at the time, the uh, interim government would not have been established, and if the government would not have been established, we wouldn't have been able to transfer sovereignty. I happen to think the transfer of sovereignty is a key moment in this, history of a free Iraq. The reason I believe that is that the Iraq people are going to follow uh Iraqi leadership, not U.S. leadership.

And uh, Prime Minister Allawi’s been there for about two and a half months, nearly three months, he’s getting his feet on the ground, he’s establishing a government, they're training police, they're training army, they're beginning to move out in, in places like Sumaria and Najaf in order to make the place a more peaceful, peaceful country.

O’REILLY: The mission accomplished statement in May 2003, if you had to do it all over again, would you not have done it?

PRESIDENT BUSH: Uh, well first of all, the statement said, Thank you for be, serving in Afghanistan and Iraq, thank you for being on one of the largest, longest cruises in our nation’s history. Thank you for serving our country, and we’ve still got tough work in Iraq. Now I’m, I’m going to go and thank our troops every chance I get.

O’REILLY: But the press spinned it, you know how they spinned it.



PRESIDENT BUSH: Well, they spin everything.

O’REILLY: Me too.

PRESIDENT BUSH: Well, -chuckles- I understand, you know, maybe you deserve it more than me, but nevertheless, -chuckles- look I, I,

O’REILLY: You’ve taken some heat for that.

PRESIDENT BUSH: I take heat for a lot of things, and uh,

O’REILLY: Would you do it again?

PRESIDENT BUSH: You mean have the sign up there?

O’REILLY: No, no, but go in there with the flight jacket,

PRESIDENT BUSH: Absolutely.

O’REILLY: You would.

PRESIDENT BUSH: Of course. I’m saying to the troops, on this carrier and elsewhere, thanks for serving America. Absolutely.

O’REILLY: Okay.

PRESIDENT BUSH: And by the way, those sol, those uh sailors and airmen, loved seeing the Commander in Chief.

These kids had been on a very long cruise. They’d been on a cruise to both, in two theaters of war now, Afghanistan and Iraq. I flew out there, and said, thanks. Thanks on behalf of a grateful nation. You bet I’d do it again.

O’REILLY: This is really a tough one.

PRESIDENT BUSH: Okay. -chuckles-

O’REILLY: Iran. Uh, said yesterday, hey, we’re going to develop this nuclear stuff, we don’t care what you think. You ready to use military force against Iran if they continue to defy the world on nuclear?

PRESIDENT BUSH: My hope is that we can solve this diplomatically.

O’REILLY: But if you can’t.

PRESIDENT BUSH: Well, let me try to solve it diplomatically first. All options are on the table, of course, in any situation. But diplomacy is the first option.

O’REILLY: Would you allow Iran to develop a nuclear weapon?

http://rds.yahoo.com/S=96062883/K=mushroom+cloud/v=2/SID=e/l=IVI/SIG=125jph2ov/*-http%3A//

PRESIDENT BUSH: We, we are working our hearts out so that they don’t develop a nuclear weapon, and the best way to do so is to continue to keep international pressure on them.

O’REILLY: Is it conceivable that you would allow them to develop a nuclear weapon?

PRESIDENT BUSH: Uh, no, we’ve made it clear, our position is that they won’t have a nuclear weapon.

O’REILLY: Period.

PRESIDENT BUSH: Yeah.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,133712,00.html


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
molly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-04 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
1. OMG - what a fuckin idiot!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zero Gravitas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-04 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #1
8. Indeed
& Bush is an idiot too!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewYorkerfromMass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-04 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #8
13. Yuk Yuk. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack_Dawson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-04 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
2. Does not ONE Fox viewer see the idiot we see?
Edited on Tue Sep-28-04 11:08 AM by Jack_Dawson
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-04 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
3. Can it be...?
O'Reilly actually asking the questions that everyone needs to ask? Who is this and what did he do with Bill O'Lielly?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack_Dawson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-04 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. O'Leilly is not the chump Hannity et al are...
A chump, yes...but he still has a shred or two of journalistic integrity. However his Stoned Slackers comment really underscored his ignorance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scairp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-04 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #3
20. I liked the questions about the lack of border security
As we all know, Bill has a bee in his bonnet about the unchecked, nearly unrestrained number of illegals coming over the border each day, and I got the distinct impression that Bill did not like Shrub's answer one little bit. And on this one issue I am seeing his point. If a poor person from Mexico or Central America can come across the border to find work, then a terrorist with money and a backpack filled with explosives can certainly do it. All this shite about Shrub keeping us safer is a lot of malarkey, and for the right- wingers to push this as the number one reason to vote for the idiot is the biggest lie of all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
russian33 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-04 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
4. Wow, what a pile of crap!
Thanks for illustrating the interview, gives it a perspective.

O’REILLY: But can they vote when people are being blown up?

PRESIDENT BUSH: Yeah.


Sick bastard!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SidDithers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-04 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #4
18. Shouldn't the next question have been "How?"...nt
Sid
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DenverDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-04 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
5. "Transcript Of O'Reilly Interview Suggests A Concise, Powerful" LIAR
He's got his spin down. Johnny K needs to be able to refute all his prevarications.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyskye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-04 11:10 AM
Response to Original message
7. Sheesh. Kerry doesn't have a chance, does he?

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-04 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
9. "And but the people want to vote."
Well said, Bush boy. Well said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-04 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
10. "the South Vietnamese didn't fight for their freedom"
Edited on Tue Sep-28-04 11:12 AM by Cocoa
Bush: "Yeah"


I think this could be considered a gaffe. A chickenhawk dissing our ally, who did the majority of the dying in Vietnam.


edit: and Bush dissed the Iraqi security forces back in April, during the Sadr fighting.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-04 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #10
21. How would either of those chickenhawks know?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ruffhowse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-04 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
11. absolutely incredible level of inarticulateness-how is this man President?
Edited on Tue Sep-28-04 11:14 AM by Ruffhowse
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RobertSeattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-04 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
12. Four "Yeahs" in Part I alone bu Bush
Edited on Tue Sep-28-04 11:17 AM by RobertSeattle
What a lazy speaker.

(And O'Shrill does 3).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rndmprsn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-04 11:21 AM
Response to Original message
14. taking points away...
i wish the debate commission was subtracting a point for every "uh", "um", "ugh", "ah", etc...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
George W. Dunce Donating Member (389 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-04 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. "You’ve got to stand tough with these terrorists."
I'm confused, does this mean I am with them or against them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theblasmo Donating Member (221 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-04 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. Remember 60 Minutes?
They showed one clip from the interview where it looked like he was critical of the Pres., and O'Reilly bragged about getting tough with him? He fed him every softball in the park here, and he couldn't hit them. Bill framed his questions so that no matter how the Pres. answered them, he'd look good. He then comments on the "Spin"? What an a**. Imagine an interview with Kerry. You'd get questions such as, "When you were killing Vietnamese babies, did you enjoy it?" or "Why does the press seem to love you so much?" And he "blames" Mike Wallace for inspiring his attitude. Wallace was a muckraker. O'Reilly is just muck.
David Murphy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-04 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
17. Bwahaha, softball questions: a great way to warm up for the "debate(s)."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-04 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
19. Bull O'Leilly is a Chimp Butt-Boy!
No mistaking it. His populist common-guy "i'm looking out for hugh" shtick is so phony!

TNR has a good summary of the mutual masterbatory exchange. Here's part of it...


Most impressive of all was O'Reilly's follow-up technique, which consisted of sternly--very sternly (O'Reilly runs a "no spin" zone, after all)--asking the president if he was sure. Call it the "You sure? Okay" method:

O'REILLY: Do you think the Iraqis are going to fight for their freedom?

BUSH: Absolutely.

O'REILLY: You do.

BUSH: No question in my mind, they will, you bet.

O'REILLY: Okay.

Or, on the subject of Bush's landing on the aircraft carrier:

O'REILLY: Would you do it again?

BUSH: You mean have the sign up there?

O'REILLY: No, no, but go in there with the flight jacket.

BUSH: Absolutely.

O'REILLY: You would.

BUSH: Of course.

O'REILLY: Okay.

http://www.tnr.com/doc.mhtml?i=express&s=frank092804
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-04 01:11 PM
Response to Original message
22. Good lord! - "the future of Iraq is the future of freedom"
And what a freaking egomaniac! "And by the way, those sol, those uh sailors and airmen, loved seeing the Commander in Chief."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 06:28 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC