Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Kookie Roberts says debates have as much impact with sound off

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-30-04 08:50 AM
Original message
Kookie Roberts says debates have as much impact with sound off
Coming from an NPR radio (RADIO) commentator this is pretty astounding. We have come to expect the TV Networks to focus on appearances and superficiality and leave the content and substance of what was said in the debates to the print media...but coming from a RADIO commentator who professes that the debates have as much impact (if not more) with the boob-tube sound turned off is...well...kooky.

That was her commentary after "listening" to sound-bites from several other Presidential debates that had such a critical impact on previous elections--Morning Edition never fails to amaze.

Apparently, past sound-bites matter...but in this debate, it would be better to focus on choreographed smiles, stage managed handshakes and tie colors. Wow! Kookie would make a great juror, huh?

Sure is easy to get the impression that TV Advertising matters so much more than actual policy debates...but it could be me.

Either that or the Network Insiders are doing their best to lower all expectations about the importance of these debates. Who was it? David Brooks who said yesterday on NPR that these debates are the small taco, not the whole enchillada.

America is eating lite these days. The shallowness continues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-30-04 08:52 AM
Response to Original message
1. I guess it's true how she got her nickname.
Nose in the toot again, Cokie?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beaconess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-30-04 08:53 AM
Response to Original message
2. Did she REALLY say that? Unbelievable!
I guess she would know - her reporting is also just as useful with the sound off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spooky3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-30-04 10:01 AM
Response to Reply #2
14. LOL--and it's radio reporting!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beaconess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-30-04 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. Exactly!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClassWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-30-04 08:55 AM
Response to Original message
3. They don't call her Cookie for nuthin...
23.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Owlet Donating Member (765 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-30-04 08:56 AM
Response to Original message
4. She just about had an on-air orgasm...
..gushing about Reagan's performance in 1980 against Carter. Then went on to imply that the major reason that Clinton kicked Bush I's ass in 1992 was because Perot was there to leaven the lump and draw fire. Gimme a break. Cokie - time to retire.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-30-04 09:45 AM
Response to Reply #4
11. Her Perot take was classic--another great sound bite
And according to her, Reagan was all about substance.

Substance is hard to come by with the sound off--these days--but maybe shallowness has become the new 'Merican ideal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-30-04 08:56 AM
Response to Original message
5. That's how she always watches them.
That's how we should listen to her on NPR, with the sound off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clinton Crusader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-30-04 08:58 AM
Response to Original message
6. Step away from the vodka, KOOKIE
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-30-04 09:14 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. Actually, I've heard her drink is a bottle of wine before bed time.
No sleep for the wicked...unless you drink yourself to sleep.

She must have a terribly guilty conscience. And then she's too hungover in the morning to behave like a moral ethical adult. She sobers up. Realizes what she did in the early evening. And then she hits the bottle again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opstachuck Donating Member (184 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-30-04 09:02 AM
Response to Original message
7. no shit, put on Dark Side of the Moon and it all makes sense...
mind if i do a J?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Triana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-30-04 09:04 AM
Response to Original message
8. who cares...
...what that numbskulled beyatch says? I quit NPR because of her (Reason #1 - there were others).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-30-04 09:11 AM
Response to Original message
9. Wish I could say the same about the propaganda value of her reporting, and
that the value was zero, but unfortunately, having the volume up on her reports has huge propaganda value.

I bet Cokie "Crack Whore" Roberts is 70% responsible for the creation of the NPR Security Mom.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wednesdays Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-30-04 09:51 AM
Response to Original message
12. Well, cut her a little slack...
At least she didn't say, "The debates have as much impact with the TV off." :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-30-04 10:00 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. from a Radio person--that might have made sense...but she said
more impact with the SOUND off--as if the 'spoken word' in debates were less meaningful than "images" OR that televisized pictures will determine the winner of this particular debate--making radio broadcasts irrelevant. Little odd coming from a NPR commentator.

I plan to listen to the debates on the radio.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cyr330 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-30-04 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
16. Look at where it's coming from
Cokie Roberts is a stupid bitch with no credibility. She whores for the Repukes every time she opens her ugly cake hole. She is one disgusting moron.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rullery Donating Member (328 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-30-04 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
17. Well if she is right, all we need is some Hollywood leading man
who looks good on TV and smiles a lot; Robert Redford and Tom Cruise come to mind. Run one of them for president, with their handlers to do the actual work of governing the nation. Oh, wait, we already did that with Ronald Reagan, didn't we? George W. Bush has his handlers too, but he fails in the good looks department IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krkaufman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-30-04 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
18. NPR has the same effect... with the sound off.
NPR has become just another "balanced" source. I've quit listening... or donating.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 05:39 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC