ARGH: Cheney was against Iraq occupation in 1992

http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/connelly/192828_joel29.html

The words of our future vice president -- defending the decision to end Gulf War I without occupying Iraq -- eerily foretell today's morass. Here is what Cheney said in '92:

"I would guess if we had gone in there, I would still have forces in Baghdad today. We'd be running the country. We would not have been able to get everybody out and bring everybody home.

"And the final point that I think needs to be made is this question of casualties. I don't think you could have done all of that without
significant additional U.S. casualties. And while everybody was tremendously impressed with the low cost of the (1991) conflict, for the 146 Americans who were killed in action and for their families, it wasn't a cheap war.

"And the question in my mind is how many additional American casualties is Saddam (Hussein) worth? And the answer is not that damned many. So, I think we got it right, both when we decided to expel him from Kuwait, but also when the president made the decision that we'd achieved our objectives and we were not going to go get bogged down in the problems of trying to take over and govern Iraq."

Cheney is scum. :grr:

" 9/11 changed everything ".

According to Cheney, "it ain't no flip flop if 9/11 is an excuse you can cop"

I think the Halliburton no-bid contract to provision the US armed forces in the event of war changed everything.

But that's just me.

Just a matter of timing.

Link: http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=103x76263

from North Carolina". Quote it back to him, Johnny E, until we weeps on national tv.

I posted this yesterday, and it was like I was talkin to myself. Which... I was!

:silly: