Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

It's Depends On What The Meaning Of "Met" Is...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-04 08:11 AM
Original message
It's Depends On What The Meaning Of "Met" Is...
Now Limp Dickzit is saying he might have met John Edwards but he never worked with him...


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
displacedtexan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-04 08:15 AM
Response to Original message
1. I heard that.
Tee Hee.

As long as we keep them on the defensive, they lose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-04 08:17 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. There's More Video Of Them Together...
I saw a video of them together at what looks like a swearing in ceremony.... But Edwards was sworn in 99....

Need an answer...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maine_raptor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-04 08:28 AM
Response to Reply #2
8. Lizzie Dole's
She's the other NC Senator.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ivote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-04 08:29 AM
Response to Reply #2
9. Swearing in ceremony
was when Elizabeth Dole was sworn in as the Junior Senator for NC.

Also Tim Russert mentioned this morning on MSNBC that Edwards and Cheney met when they both were appearing on "MTP" didn't say if their appearance was at the same time, but they did shake hands backstage.
Also remember that when the pubs say (SPIN) He meant that he didn't meet Edwards on the Senate floor. Could that be because the pubs only meet with themselves and always cut the Dems out?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Infomaniac Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-04 08:20 AM
Response to Original message
3. The meaning of "met" is quite clear.
Cheney tried to diss Edwards last night by making it sound like Edwards had a No-show job. His choice of words is coming back to bite him in the ass. Keep hammering at if Crashcart and Co can't be honest about something as plain as day as meeting someone, what can they tell the truth about?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-04 08:22 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Exactly....
As I said in another thread Cheney is a compulsive liar... He is so comfortable lying he will lie even when the truth will suffice...


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
qanda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-04 08:25 AM
Response to Original message
5. The problem is...
He found it necessary to be so rude in the first place. I gather, because I didn't watch this debate, that Cheney acted just like George-- only without the facial expressions. They don't think they owe anyone an explanation and this is the behavior that has the world alienated from us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SidDithers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-04 08:26 AM
Response to Original message
6. If that were the case...
then Cheney didn't "meet" him last nite either, though he clearly stated that's was the first time they'd met.

Sid
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shopaholic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-04 08:28 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. It's hard to work with someone from the other party,
if you only meet with someone from your own party. Tricky Dick ONLY meets with the Repugs when he makes trips to the Senate!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-04 08:33 AM
Response to Original message
10. Right... Do we really know if he was PROPERLY introduced?? Ugh! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 02:49 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC