Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Private Prison Jails Reopen under Arnold

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Places » California Donate to DU
 
realFedUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 12:59 PM
Original message
Private Prison Jails Reopen under Arnold

http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-prisons21jan21,1,4381779.story?coll=la-headlines-california

As Private Jails Reopen, Critics See Long Arm of the Lobbyists
After closures, a prison company retained consultants close to Schwarzenegger.

By Dan Morain
Times Staff Writer

January 21, 2005

SACRAMENTO — The Schwarzenegger administration has quietly moved to reopen two private prisons a year after mothballing them — and after a company that stands to profit retained consultants close to the governor and his inner circle. Administration officials attribute the reversal to an unexpected rise in the number of prisoners. Prisons Department critics point to the private prison company's lobbying.

The administration has decided to reopen two facilities, one of which is a 224-bed prison in the Central Valley town of McFarland. A Florida company ran the McFarland facility for 15 years until Dec. 31, 2003, when the state moved its last prisoners out.

Rather than abandon California, the company, the GEO Group Inc., retained a top Schwarzenegger campaign official and a lobby firm that has close ties to the Republican's administration to restore the company's standing in California. A company that is a spinoff of GEO and owns the prison at McFarland placed Donna Arduin on its board of trustees in October, 10 days after she left her job as Schwarzenegger's director of the Department of Finance, which oversees all state spending.

"This was an administration that said they weren't going to be influenced by special interests," said Lance Corcoran, executive vice president of the California Correctional Peace Officers Assn., the union that represents state prison guards and opposes private lockups.

"The private prison industry to us is a special interest."
continued
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Union Thug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 01:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. Wow, aint it great! Now let's have private
Fire departments and energy and wouldn't it all be great??? What? All were miserable, despicable failures the last time around?

Nevermind.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
2. Hmm, a German-sounding "popular" figure
opening up more jails.

This doesn't sound good . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-22-05 01:51 AM
Response to Original message
3. This is the biggest lobby in California. Anyone here read Didion? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
realFedUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-23-05 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. do you want to post a link to what you are referring to...
Joan Didion? The Prison Guard union is the
strongest in CA...I'm not sure that the private
prisons are using union workers though...

this story is really about who is whispering
in Arnie's ear and thrusting their dollars in
his pockets.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-23-05 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. I'll see if I can find it on the net. I was referring to JD's last book
Where I was From, where she does an expose of the prison unions.

And, off the top of my head (pointed and small as it is, lol) the pattern has been for the neos to look at successful union strategies and co-opt them. Or so it has seemed to me.

So, this is not about using union workers; it's about using a network to appropriate the power that industry has had in the state house. (Does that make sense?)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 08:23 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Places » California Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC