Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Last piece of Orange County toll roads drawing fire

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Places » California Donate to DU
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 10:47 AM
Original message
Last piece of Orange County toll roads drawing fire
Wednesday, February 16, 2005

Last piece of Orange County toll roads drawing fire

By: MARK WALKER - Staff Writer
North (San Diego) County Times

NORTH COUNTY ---- Environmental groups will gather in Orange County this afternoon to plan their next moves in fighting a toll road that could cut through San Onofre State Beach park just north of Camp Pendleton.

For the region's surfers, the proposed road and its construction threaten what they consider to be one of Southern California's premier beaches and surfing spots ---- the waves off of Trestles Beach at the park.

(snip)

The plan is to link Highway 241 just east of Mission Viejo with I-5 just south of the Orange County-San Diego County line.

(snip)

Three of the proposed routes for the four-lane toll road would pass through the eastern portion of the park, which contains hiking trails, an outdoor education center and camping sites. Those routes also would take the road through the Donna O'Neill Land Conservancy, thus the opposition from groups such as the Sierra Club and Surfrider. The road would have the potential to be expanded to six lanes.

Lisa Telles, the chief communications officer for the transportation corridor group, said it has the authority to put the route through the state park under the agreement between the Marine Corps and the state.

Besides environmentalists, the plan has some high-profile opponents, including state Attorney General Bill Lockyer and state Parks Director Ruth Coleman. Each wrote letters last year strenuously objecting to the park route before the public comment period ended in August.

More..

http://www.nctimes.com/articles/2005/02/16/news/state/0_14_302_16_05.txt

Contact staff writer Mark Walker at (760) 740-3529 or mlwalker@nctimes.com.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
xxqqqzme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 11:58 AM
Response to Original message
1. 25,000 homes?
who can afford 2 buy them? 25,000 homes means the road WILL B widened, In SoCal 25,000 homes = 75,000 cars.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jfern Donating Member (394 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 08:14 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. We need more urban density
and less sprawl
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zorro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-17-05 11:41 PM
Response to Original message
3. They complained about development at Trestles Beach before
About 10 years ago the Marines wanted to build family housing above Trestles beach. The surfers and conservationists came out in force to try and stop them from that development.

Needless to say, fighting the Marines over property under the control of the Marines was not a recipe for success. I guess there is some consolation in the fact that surfers are still flocking to Trestles, so I presume the development didn't degrade the surf.

I really don't think building the road will markedly degrade the local environment. After all, I-5 is about 10 lanes wide around that area, and there is a nuclear power plant sitting right on the coast there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Places » California Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC