Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Proposed amendment to state constitution to popular vote

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Places » Colorado Donate to DU
 
JohnLocke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-01-04 09:42 PM
Original message
Proposed amendment to state constitution to popular vote
Edited on Sun Aug-01-04 09:43 PM by JohnLocke
Article II, Section I of the U.S. Constitution says that:
"Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors, equal to the whole Number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress."
----
In other words, a state may choose its electors any way it wants to. Most states hold an election and the candidate with the most votes gets all the electors. In Maine and Nebraska, the winner of each congressional district gets one elector and the winner of the state as a whole gets two more. But the state legislature is free to just skip the election altogether to save the taxpayers money and just appoint the electors directly. The Colorado state legislature did precisely this in the bitterly contested election of 1876, in which the Democrat, Samuel Tilden won the popular vote over the Republican Rutherford B. Hayes. (...)

With this rather lengthy introduction, we get to today's news. A group of Colorado citizens have proposed a change to the state's constitution specifying that Colorado's nine electors be apportioned strictly in proportion to the popular vote. Currently Bush is ahead 48% to 43% there, so under the proposed system, Bush would get five electoral votes and Kerry four electoral votes, instead of nine to zero. The group has turned in petitions containing 130,000 signatures. If about 68,000 of these prove to be valid, the question will be a ballot referendum in November. If it passes, the change takes effect for this year's election. If it makes the ballot, on the evening of Nov. 2, the TV news anchors will probably be saying: "President Bush won Colorado with 55% of the vote, but we don't know how many votes he will get in the electoral college until they finish recounting the closely fought referendum on changing the Colorado state constitution." Whoever loses will appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court, which once again may have to rule on the sensitive issue of state's rights.
----
http://www.electoral-vote.com/aug/aug01.html
http://www.rockymountainnews.com/drmn/election/article/0,1299,DRMN_36_3077685,00.html
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
El Supremo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-01-04 10:05 PM
Response to Original message
1. Good reasons not to vote for it, but a better one will be...
Kerry wins Colorado 51% to Bush 49%, but because of the way Colorado apportions its electoral votes, Bush gets 4 to Kerry's 5. And Kerry looses the national election by 3 votes total.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-01-04 10:10 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Jeez, I signed it!
Besdies Clinton, when have we gone blue? Yipes!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Robb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-02-04 08:38 AM
Response to Original message
3. Anyone have a website for Make Your Vote Count?
:shrug: I've had no luck... they must have an online presence?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Places » Colorado Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC