What bugs me about Lieberman

is the same thing that bugs me about the rest of the apologist/enabler dems, and it just struck me today watching Lanny Davis on MTP. Maybe Joe HAS voted with the dems 90% of the time. But too many times the dems have voted for questionable programs that the rank and file doesn't like. Too many times the dems have voted for the president because we're at war, after all.

As a former CT dem (I now live in PA and don't have to worry so much), I still write Joe about issues important to my family. Lord knows I won't get any representation from my senators. And I've found myself writing to him a whole damn lot because, whether or not he votes with other dems, the votes are still going for the topiary.

So, CT dems, is it just me, or is the opposition against Joe rooted in this fact? Are CT dems merely the first to wake up to the fact that he may be voting with the dems, but the dems are all too often voting for the president? And maybe they would all be facing genuine opposition if more state democrat organizations could field true opposition candidates?

I, ah, am cross calculating tide tables and weather changes and resetting my electronic chronometers to precise time in time center England.

My base in cross comparism is New London or in exacts Grotton.

Friends from Connecticut, the nation awaits your vioce in tomorrows vote.

Your decision will perhaps become the beginning of a powerful order of demand change and reform.

There is no such thing as being too close to the republicans or Bush. You are either one of them or not.

Lieberman supports the war of no real difinition or mission.
Leaving to question just what is he for.

As 2007 nears we as a nation may well become surprised by what may be referred to as Nixon,s last trick.

It may be that at some point in early 1974 Nixon could have come into the realization the He, was being used as a pawn by the oil wigs. And as you may know Nixon as a elitist just may have had the big trick up his sleeve. As 2007 becomes ever so near,we can only wait and see just what pops up in many different places. Perhaps Nixon attached his most brillant defence of himself and the president in the capicity of a lawer defending the president thereby defing as the saying goes, the lawer who defends himself ,has a fool for a client. Nixons Last Trick.
The oil imbargo, whipp inflation now.

We Shall See.

we are just doing our civic duty to protect it !

Bridges ,troubled waters , and in the clearing stands the boxer and a fighter by his train.

It is not Lieberman who is the Boxer,
The fighters by their train are the nations youth.

It is we the people that are THE Boxer.,
And it will take all that we possess of our training to turn this thing around.

If we continue to allow ourselves to be fooled, than it is we that are made to be fools.

We won,t be fooled again.


Please, force the point on Lieberman, thereby forcing the realization apon all of those in our government that are reluctant in their ways.

This nation has been hornswoggled by the most disastrous ban of war moungers ever assembled in Washington D.C.

And they know not what they do.