Why can't the KCMOSD stick to a superintendent?

They might as well install a revolving door in the school board HQ. Why can't they just split up the district

The kids really are better off without him. At least the funny money games will stop.

There was a time when I thought they needed to go out of town to find a superintendent who wasn't a part of the corrupt system. But now I think they might be better off with a homegrown superintendent, and maybe even a current district employee, who has a tie to the district and the community.

There have been so many bad superintendents I wonder if they would be better off without a superintendent. Can't help but remember a time when I was in school and our principal was fired in the middle of the year and we spent the rest of that school year without a principal. Discipline improved and it was definitely a nicer school without a principal. Another time I was working retail and the store manager was fired. That store was so much better without a manager. All the assistants were applying for the manager's job so they were on their best behavior. So maybe having a head honcho is not all that necessary. LOL