Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Response from my Rep. Tim Biship; "Country headed in Wrong Direction"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Places » New York Donate to DU
 
HockeyMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-05 08:37 AM
Original message
Response from my Rep. Tim Biship; "Country headed in Wrong Direction"
Dear Ms......,

Thank you for contacting me to express your concern with the Bush
Administration's policies. It is important for me to have the benefit of
your views, and I appreciate you taking the time to contact me.

I share your belief that this country is heading in the wrong direction,
and I am working hard to see that we return to a time of constructive
debate and responsible decision making. I share your concern that the
current leadership has enacted policies that are not in the best interests
of Americans. I find the ongoing efforts by the Administration to
undermine longstanding environmental policies to be particularly
troubling. I believe the environment highlights their overall strategy of
putting special interests ahead of the public interest. Protecting our
environment is one of my top priorities, which is why I have voted to
safeguard our environment at every single opportunity, and will continue
to do so.

I will also advocate for policies that help protect our civil liberties.
The USA PATRIOT Act, which was enacted after the terrible events of
September 11, 2001, is viewed by many as a threat to our Constitutionally
guaranteed rights. I have grave reservations about elements of the
PATRIOT Act, and I believe this Congress owes it to the American people to
resist the urge to reauthorize this legislation until we have thoroughly
examined the worrisome components of this bill. I think we can all agree
that we are living in a difficult time, where we have to balance new
security threats with our constitutionally guaranteed rights. In my
opinion, we must not strike this balance in haste, and where we have made
mistakes we must correct them. I will continue to demand that the
Administration allow a well-informed debate on these issues before we take
further action.

I have said that at the time it was considered, I would have supported
the resolution to make clear that Congress stood behind the President's
efforts to disarm Saddam Hussein. However, I too am troubled, both by the
virtually inescapable conclusion that the imminence of the threat posed by
Iraq was exaggerated by the Administration, and by the recognition that
the Administration's plan for securing and rebuilding post-war Iraq was
woefully inadequate. Even though the extraordinary men and women in our
armed services quickly toppled the Iraqi regime, establishing a new order
and building a peaceful society in Iraq has proven far more difficult than
overthrowing a tyrant. I believe the Administration must be more
accountable to the American people and provide us with a long-term plan
for restoring order in Iraq as soon as possible.

Thank you again for expressing your concerns. Please do not hesitate to
contact me again if I can be of further assistance. For more information
and to find out what I am working on in Congress, please visit my website
at http://www.house.gov/timbishop.

Sincerely,



Timothy Bishop
Member of Congress
TB/nh


Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-05 08:43 AM
Response to Original message
1. Is he a Democrat? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DaveinMD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-05 08:49 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. he is a Dem
he knocked off a Republican incumbent in 2000 I believe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
HockeyMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-05 09:02 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Tim Bishop
was a Professor and Provost at Southampton College. He beat the incumbent Conservative Republican Steve Forbes in 2000. Forbes was very outspoken in his views in support of Clinton's impeachment. It was a major issue in the campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Catrina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Tim Bushop is my
Edited on Wed Aug-03-05 02:41 PM by Catrina
Rep. He is a really decent guy ~ Mike Forbes chose to ignore two thirds of his constituents telling him not to vote for impeachment and lost his seat in Congress.

Sometimes poetic justice occurs, as it did in the case of Mike Forbes. Mike betrayed his promise to his constituency, not to be influenced by Washington politics, and went ahead and voted for impeachment and then, the position he so craved, as 'Speaker' Livingston's righthand man, disappeared when Larry Flynt revealed Livingston, like Clinton, had his own extra-marital problems.

I like Tim Bishop ~ he's honest ~ and a pretty good rep. who does listen to his constituents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
4_TN_TITANS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-05 09:57 AM
Response to Original message
4. Refreshingly to the point....
I wish my rep was that out-spoken, but Bart Gordon (D-TN)tends to do more fence-sitting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Jim Lane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-01-05 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
6. Correcting the electoral history of the 1st CD
Mike Forbes (not Steve) was elected in 1994 as a Republican. In 1999 he switched to the Democratic Party, but lost the Democratic primary in 2000. The seat was won that year by a conservative Republican, Felix Grucci. Grucci lasted only one term, losing in 2002 to Democrat Tim Bishop, who was re-elected in 2004.

http://www.centerforpolitics.org/crystalball/2004/house/?state=NY
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
HockeyMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-04-05 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. You are right
It was Mike, not Steve.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 07:50 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Places » New York Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC