Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

New Yorkers: Don't Buy New Machines and Dump the Old! (X)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Places » New York Donate to DU
 
kster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-25-07 08:39 PM
Original message
New Yorkers: Don't Buy New Machines and Dump the Old! (X)


November 25, 2007

by Sheila Parks

http://www.opednews.com

In USA v. New York State Board of Elections, et al. (US District Court,Northern District of NY, Civil Action No. 06-CV-0263) Department of Justice (DOJ) Attorney Brian Heffernan argues that even though no electronic voting systems exist that meet NY's voting technology standards, NY must use the faulty technology.

The right to vote, as well as the principle of “one person, one vote,” are cornerstones of our democracy. The anti-slavery, women’s suffrage, and civil rights movements as well as the expansion of voting to young people are all part of the history of voting rights in this country. Equally fundamental is the assurance that each voter knows that her or his vote counts and is counted as intended. At this time in our history, many have lost confidence in our voting system. This confidence must be restored.

Last year, I observed five hand-counted paper ballots (HCPB) elections: three in Massachusetts, one in Vermont and one in Maine. All five hand-countings of the paper ballots were conducted smoothly, without any hassles and were finished in a timely manner. Although HCPB do not address the egregious suppression of the vote, coupling the elimination of this suppression with HCPB is the only way we will have fair, honest, transparent elections.

In Acton, Maine, in the General Election on November 7, 2006, I observed six teams of two counters each, hand-count paper ballots. Each team was made up of a Republican and a Democrat. Not only did each team hand-count the paper ballots, but also they immediately audited the hand-count. That is, they did a second hand-count immediately after the first hand-count. With seven races and two initiatives, the six teams of two people each were able to hand-count twice 944 ballots in four hours.

http://www.opednews.com/articles/opedne_sheila_p_071125_new_yorkers_3a__dump_t.htm

(X)... http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=203x486477
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
brooklynite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-01-07 09:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. Not wanting to criticize paper ballots inherently...
...but Acton, Me has a population of 2,145, and NYC has 8 million, or 4.000 times the size. By extension, it would take 2 years to hand count an equivalently large number of ballots.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Fredda Weinberg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-02-07 12:23 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I'll criticize hand counts and the Luddites who advocate 'em
What honest vendor would bid on election systems w/hysterics like this? As usual, Albany will wait until the political winds separate wheat from chaff.

I'm proud to live in a crowded city where we use resources as efficiently as possible. It means we lead the way with culture, etiquette and other luxuries of civilization. It's worth preserving, even tolerating a reasonable percentage of graft and waste.

We're the envy of the world ... don't compare us to a small town.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Places » New York Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC