Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush as TX gov signed law allowing HOSPITAL to terminate life support

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Places » Texas Donate to DU
 
DesEtoiles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-05 07:17 PM
Original message
Bush as TX gov signed law allowing HOSPITAL to terminate life support
I ALREADY RECEIVED A SNARKY RESPONSE FROM THE HOUSTON CHRONICLE - I E-MAILED THIS SATURDAY NIGHT AND THEY RESPONDED SUNDAY MORNING. PELT THE CHRONICLE WITH QUESTIONS ABOUT THIS.

_____________________

George W. Bush, while governor of Texas, signed a law allowing hospitals to terminate life-support for incapacitated patients, even against the wishes of the family. Specifically if the patient cannot pay. How does this fit in with Bush and DeLay's actions on the Schiavo matter this weekend? How does this fit in with the recently passed bankruptcy bill, which does not offer bankruptcy protection to those with debts from medical expenses?

Here's the Houston Chronicle's story referencing the state law signed by Bush:

http://www.chron.com/cs/CDA/ssistory.mpl/metropolitan/3073295

Hospitals can end life support
Decision hinges on patient's ability to pay, prognosis

and another recent Chronicle story regarding the termination of life support of an infant against the mother's wishes:

http://www.chron.com/cs/CDA/ssistory.mpl/front/3087387

Baby dies after hospital removes breathing tube
Case is the first in which a judge allowed a hospital to discontinue care

(This weekend Tom DeLay gave a press conference stating that (1) patients in this condition deserve due process and (2) doctors can be wrong about a prognosis ). Where was Tom DeLay? This story was in the news for several weeks.
____________________________

And here's a copy of the state statute:

Texas Health & Safety Code - Chapter 166

  § 166.046.  PROCEDURE IF NOT EFFECTUATING A DIRECTIVE OR
TREATMENT DECISION.  (a)  If an attending physician refuses to
honor a patient's advance directive or a health care or treatment
decision made by or on behalf of a patient, the physician's refusal
shall be reviewed by an ethics<0> or medical committee.  The attending
physician may not be a member of that committee.  The patient shall
be given life<0>-sustaining treatment during the review.
        (b)  The patient or the person responsible for the health
care decisions of the individual who has made the decision
regarding the directive or treatment decision:
                (1)  may be given a written description of the ethics<0> or
medical committee review process and any other policies and
procedures related to this section adopted by the health care
facility;
                (2)  shall be informed of the committee review process
not less than 48 hours before the meeting called to discuss the
patient's directive, unless the time period is waived by mutual
agreement;
                (3)  at the time of being so informed, shall be
provided:                  
                        (A)  a copy of the appropriate statement set forth
in Section 166.052;  and
                        (B)  a copy of the registry list of health care
providers and referral groups that have volunteered their readiness
to consider accepting transfer or to assist in locating a provider
willing to accept transfer that is posted on the website maintained
by the Texas Health Care Information Council under Section 166.053;  
and
                (4)  is entitled to:                                                          
                        (A)  attend the meeting;  and                                                
                        (B)  receive a written explanation of the decision
reached during the review process.
        (c)  The written explanation required by Subsection
(b)(2)(B) must be included in the patient's medical record.
        (d)  If the attending physician, the patient, or the person
responsible for the health care decisions of the individual does
not agree with the decision reached during the review process under
Subsection (b), the physician shall make a reasonable effort to
transfer the patient to a physician who is willing to comply with
the directive.  If the patient is a patient in a health care
facility, the facility's personnel shall assist the physician in
arranging the patient's transfer to:
                (1)  another physician;                                                      
                (2)  an alternative care setting within that facility;  
or                  
                (3)  another facility.                                                        
        (e)  If the patient or the person responsible for the health
care decisions of the patient is requesting life<0>-sustaining
treatment that the attending physician has decided and the review
process has affirmed is inappropriate treatment, the patient shall
be given available life<0>-sustaining treatment pending transfer
under Subsection (d).  The patient is responsible for any costs
incurred in transferring the patient to another facility.  The
physician and the health care facility are not obligated to provide
life<0>-sustaining treatment after the 10th day after the written
decision required under Subsection (b) is provided to the patient
or the person responsible for the health care decisions of the
patient unless ordered to do so under Subsection (g).
        (e-1)  If during a previous admission to a facility a
patient's attending physician and the review process under
Subsection (b) have determined that life<0>-sustaining treatment is
inappropriate, and the patient is readmitted to the same facility
within six months from the date of the decision reached during the
review process conducted upon the previous admission, Subsections
(b) through (e) need not be followed if the patient's attending
physician and a consulting physician who is a member of the ethics<0>
or medical committee of the facility document on the patient's
readmission that the patient's condition either has not improved or
has deteriorated since the review process was conducted.
        (f)  Life<0>-sustaining treatment under this section may not be
entered in the patient's medical record as medically unnecessary
treatment until the time period provided under Subsection (e) has
expired.
        (g)  At the request of the patient or the person responsible
for the health care decisions of the patient, the appropriate
district or county court shall extend the time period provided
under Subsection (e) only if the court finds, by a preponderance of
the evidence, that there is a reasonable expectation that a
physician or health care facility that will honor the patient's
directive will be found if the time extension is granted.
        (h)  This section may not be construed to impose an
obligation on a facility or a home and community support services
agency licensed under Chapter 142 or similar organization that is
beyond the scope of the services or resources of the facility or
agency.  This section does not apply to hospice services provided by
a home and community support services agency licensed under Chapter
142.

Added by Acts 1999, 76th Leg., ch. 450, § 1.03, eff. Sept. 1,
1999.  Amended by Acts 2003, 78th Leg., ch. 1228, § 3, 4, eff.
June 20, 2003
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Inland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-05 07:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. But....that would make Bush some sort of hypocrite!
Who knew?!?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xray s Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-05 07:30 PM
Response to Original message
2. "Bush's Baby Killer Law Takes Infant Life In Texas!!!!!"
See how effective demagoguery is? If Bill Clinton signed a law like this in Arkansas you can bet your last donut that the right wing media machine would be screaming a headline like this one 24/7.

Republicans have no shame. It is how they win elections, and why we will eventually descend into a fascist state.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DesEtoiles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-05 07:35 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Here's fax numbers for all Florida Senators and Reps:
Senator Bill Nelson (D-FL)
billnelson.senate.gov
Phone: (202) 224-5274
Fax: (202) 228-2183

Senator Mel Martinez (R-FL)
martinez.senate.gov
Phone: (202) 224-3041
Fax: (202) 228-5171
?
Representative Jeff Miller (R-FL 1st)
jeffmiller.house.gov
Phone: (202) 225-4136
Fax: (202) 225-3414
?
Representative F. Allen Boyd, Jr. (D-FL 2nd)
www.house.gov/boyd
Phone: (202) 225-5235
Fax: (202) 225-5615

Representative Corrine Brown (D-FL 3rd)
www.house.gov/corrinebrown
Phone: (202) 225-0123
Fax: (202) 225-2256
?
Representative Ander Crenshaw (R-FL 4th)
crenshaw.house.gov
Phone: (202) 225-2501
Fax: (202) 225-2504
?
Representative Ginny Brown-Waite (R-FL 5th)
www.house.gov/brown-waite
Phone: (202) 225-1002
Fax: (202) 226-6559

Representative Cliff Stearns (R-FL 6th)
www.house.gov/stearns
Phone: (202) 225-5744
Fax: (202) 225-3973
?
Representative John Mica (R-FL 7th)
www.house.gov/mica
Phone: (202) 225-4035
Fax: (202) 226-0821

Representative Ric Keller (R-FL 8th)
keller.house.gov
Phone: (202) 225-2176
Fax: (202) 225-0999
?
Representative Michael Bilirakis (R-FL 9th)
www.house.gov/bilirakis
Phone: (202) 225-5755
Fax: (202) 225-4085
?
Representative C.W. Bill Young (R-FL 10th)
www.house.gov/young
hone: (202) 225-5961
Fax: (202) 225-9764
?
Representative Jim Davis (D-FL 11th)
www.house.gov/jimdavis
Phone: (202) 225-3376
Fax: (202) 225-5652
?
Representative Adam Putnam (R-FL 12th)
www.house.gov/putnam
Phone: (202) 225-1252
Fax: (202) 226-0585
?
Representative Katherine Harris (R-FL 13th)
harris.house.gov
Phone: (202) 225-5015
Fax: (202) 226-0828
?
Representative Connie Mack (R-FL 14th)
www.house.gov/mack
Phone: (202) 225-2536
Fax: (202) 226-0439
?
Representative Dave Weldon (R-FL 15th)
www.house.gov/weldon
Phone: (202) 225-3671
Fax: (202) 225-3516
?
Representative Mark Foley (R-FL 16th)
www.house.gov/foley
Phone: (202) 225-5792
Fax: (202) 225-3132
?
Representative Kendrick B. Meek (D-FL 17th)
kendrickmeek.house.gov
Phone: (202) 225-4506
Fax: (202) 226-0777
?
Representative Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (R-FL 18th)
www.house.gov/ros-lehtinen
Phone: (202) 225-3931
Fax: (202) 225-5620
?
Representative Robert I. Wexler (D-FL 19th)
www.house.gov/wexler
Phone: (202) 225-3001
Fax: (202) 225-5974
?
Representative Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-FL 20th)
www.house.gov/wasserman-schultz
Phone: (202) 225-7931
Fax: (202) 225-8456

Representative Lincoln Diaz-Balart (R-FL 21st)
diaz-balart.house.gov
Phone: (202) 225-4211
Fax: (202) 225-8576
?
Representative E. Clay Shaw, Jr. (R-FL 22nd)
shaw.house.gov
Phone: (202) 225-3026
Fax: (202) 225-8398
?
Representative Alcee L. Hastings (D-FL 23rd)
www.alceehastings.house.gov
Phone: (202) 225-1313
Fax: (202) 225-1171
?
Representative Tom Feeney (R-FL 24th)
www.house.gov/feeney
Phone: (202) 225-2706
Fax: (202) 226-6299
?
Representative Mario Diaz-Balart (R-FL 25th)
www.house.gov/mariodiaz-balart
Phone: (202) 225-2778
Fax: (202) 226-0346

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-05 01:47 AM
Response to Original message
4. Typical Bush. When he was governor he passed one thing but
now that he is pResident, he signs against it. That's just like when he was governor he signed some law that give you the right to do a hand recount or something like that, and when he lost against Al Gore, he was against it.

Flip flopping asshole.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lithos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-05 08:53 AM
Response to Original message
5. Good story
Thanks for bringing up his typical hypocrisy...

L-
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pikku Donating Member (292 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-05 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
6. This story needs to be spread around more
Few people know about this, but it is important.

It proves that not only is bush NOT pro-life, but he is even so crass as to allow ability to pay to be a consideration for removing life support.

The name Sun Hudson needs to be brought up every time Schiavo's is.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CoolOnion Donating Member (860 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-05 08:20 PM
Response to Original message
7. Swarm! Swarm!
Edited on Mon Mar-21-05 08:21 PM by CoolOnion
The Democracy Cell Project is doing a blogswarm to the media--read all about it at:
http://www.democracycellproject.net/blog/archives/2005/03/blogswarm_on_te.html

Over the weekend, they sent email to the media about how the GOP is politicizing the Schiavo case. They sent to:

360@cnn.com, 48hours@cbsnews.com, am@cnn.com, Colmes@foxnews.com, comments@foxnews.com, crossfire@cnn.com, dateline@nbc.com, daybreak@cnn.com, earlyshow@cbs.com, evening@cbsnews.com, insidepolitics@cnn.com, live@cnn.com, livefrom@cnn.com, newsnight@cnn.com, nightline@abcnews.com, nightly@nbc.com, today@nbc.com, wam@cnn.com, wolf@cnn.com, wsj.ltrs@wsj.com, netaudr@abc.com, public@NYT.com, connected@msnbc.com, hardball@msnbc.com,countdown@msnbc.com

Now, we should "swarm" the media with the story from the Houston Chronicle. My subject line: "Bush's pro-death law claims baby's life in DeLay's District." Feel free to use that one, or create your own sensational headline!




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Places » Texas Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC