Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The case against Lamar Smith

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Places » Texas Donate to DU
 
sonias Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-28-06 05:18 PM
Original message
The case against Lamar Smith
Where to start? There's quite a bit to report.

  • First let's start with the BOR reported link to Just Another Matt's blog and excellent timeline of Lamar Smith's corruption protection plan
    http://justanothermatt.blogspot.com/2006/01/lamar-smith-is-enabler.html
    Matt creates a visual chart of why Lamar Smith is an Enabler to the Culture of Corruption.

  • Then we have John Courage himself calling for Smith to resign his ethics committee post
    http://www.courageforcongress.org/blog/?action=view&id=17
    Calling on Lamar Smith to resign his post on the House Ethics Committee

  • Then we have the 2005 review from Talking Points Memo giving us the detail on Smith's role in weakening ethics rules on the committee
    http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/week_2005_01_02.php#004332

  • Here's the story at KVUE with Smith on ethics on Thursday 1/26
    http://www.kvue.com/news/local/stories/012606kvueethics-cb.3fd9d836.html
    Smith to push for ethics reforms
    "I think we have an obligation to clean up our own house. I think we have an obligation to try to maintain and even improve the integrity of the institution, and we can do that by taking action ourselves to restore people's confidence," Smith said.

    Smith also said he supports republican Roy Blunt of Missouri to be the next majority leader, replacing Houston-area Congressman Tom Delay.


  • So finally, let me close with my favorite summary on Blunt - Meet the new boss, same as the old boss -
    http://www.davidsirota.com/2005/09/blunts-record-shows-hes-as-corrupt-as.html
    Blunt's Record Shows He's As Corrupt As DeLay
    BLUNT USES SAME CONSULTANT UNDER INDICTMENT WITH DELAY: "The political committee of Rep. Roy Blunt has paid roughly $88,000 in fees since 2003 to a consultant under indictment in Texas with DeLay, according to federal records. Blunt retains Ellis' firm, J.W. Ellis Co.
    BLUNT HAS CLOSE TIES TO LOBBYIST UNDER FEDERAL INVESTIGATION: "Rep. Blunt and his staff have close connections to uber-lobbyist Jack Abramoff, who is the subject of criminal and congressional probes.
    Much, much more at link


So the case is clear - Lamar Smith has enabled corruption, contributed $10,000 to DeLay's legal defense fund, voted to weaken ethics rules in Congress to protect DeLay. And he supports Blunt as the permanent House Speaker, despite the fact that he's just as corrupt as DeLay. Therefore any reform talk coming out of Lamar Smith's mouth is the typical party line lies.

Who are you going to believe Smith, or your brain? Vote the culture of corruption out!

Sonia
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
acmejack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-28-06 05:28 PM
Response to Original message
1. You go, Sonias!
You too, Lamar, but to a somewhat different destination! Great post, I think Lamar is going down!

"Hear dat? You goin' down, Sucka!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sonias Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-28-06 05:57 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Thank you, kind sir
I'm going to say I agree partially with Lamar Smith on one thing. When he says "I think we have an obligation to try to maintain and even improve the integrity of the institution". I would say that we as voters have the same obligation to improve the integrity of Congress, by voting the corrupt bastards out.

Lamar Smith has got to go
Tom DeLay has got to go
Smokey Joe Barton has got to go
John Carter has got to go
Henry Bonilla has got to go
Michael McCaul has got to go
Randy Neugebauer has got to go (noogiegbooger)
Ted Poe has got to go
Sam Johnson has got to go
Kenny Marchant has got to go
Pete Sessions has got to go
Kevin Brady has got to go
Jeb Hensarling has got to go
Ralph Hall has got to go
Louie Gohmert has got to go

Kick'em out, kick them the hell out!

Sonia
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MagickMuffin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-28-06 06:55 PM
Response to Original message
3. I ran across this interesting diagram by AP
it's kinda a time-line concerning BugBoy DeLay, Blunt, and etc. I believe they called it "Follow the Money"
They have linkable items that will lead you to PDF's of some of the documents filed by the ethics committee.
Most of them were for the years 2000-2001. It has the files of how the money flowed from one campaign to another. Most of the files are for Blunt, and his (get a load of this title) Rely on your Beliefs Fund....:rofl:

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/files/specials/interactives/_politics/delaytimeline/index.html

I've already downloaded them for my K Street Scandal project...:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sonias Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-02-06 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
4. I'm going to re-open the case
I'm going to continue making the case on why Lamar Smith is not fit to represent Congressional District 21.

On Dec. 19, 2005 Lamar Smith joined his republican counterparts in voting yes on the "Budget Reconciliation bill". This bill also squeaked by the Senate last year and was voted on once again, yesterday. bush will sign the bill and it will become law. More information on the bill at WaPo. Budget Cuts Pass By a Slim Margin.

The vote in the House this week, was 216-214. Every vote in favor of that bill was a republican. Every Democrat voted against that bill. 13 republicans and 1 independent voted against the bill.

This bill tries to balance the books on the backs of the poor and those who are most vulnerable. It makes cuts in Medicaid, student loans, welfare and cuts in state money that helps with child support collection. Yet the republicans, including Smith, want to make sure that tax cuts for the wealthiest 1% in this country are made permanent. How many of those millionaires live in Lamar Smith's district? I would like to now.

UT Student Michael O'Keefe Cowles wrote a guest editorial on Feb 1st on what it means for students

Texan article link
Dishing out more debt for students
The latest version of the budget reconciliation bill that passed the Senate on Dec. 21 will cut $12.7 billion from loan programs, making student loans the biggest victim from Congressional Republican leadership's budget-slashing initiatives this fiscal year. These cuts are also the biggest cuts to the U.S. student aid program in its 40-year history. If this bill passes, students will soon end up with a lot more debt than they otherwise would have.

(snip)
So why are social spending cuts being born heaviest by students? Most likely because college students often do not vote, particularly in the numbers that other groups, senior citizens for instance, do. Two U.S. Congressional representatives who represent the UT Austin area both voted for it. Representatives Michael McCaul and Lamar Smith (McCaul represents the area just north of campus and Smith just south of it) voted to pass on these heavy cuts for students, giving the House the slim majority that it needed to do so. Under this bill, students will shoulder the cutbacks as Republican legislators continue not only to run huge deficits, but also to pass tax cuts for many in the top income brackets. McCaul and Smith have both voted previously for the budget reconciliation bill.
(/snip)


Vote them out, vote them all out!

Sonia


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sonias Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-04-06 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
5. Exhibit 101 - quid pro quo
I'm going to keep this thread case going up to election date. Feel free to join in or create your own cases against your Congressmen you want to unseat.

Today's exhibit is what the real reason Lamar Smith and most of the Texas republican congressional delegation supported Roy Blunt. Not that John Boehner is better than Blunt. They're the same corruption, just a different shade of lipstick on the pig.
('ll pronounce it boner -thank you Jon Stewart):rofl:

Smith and the gang of Texas republicans continued to support Roy Blunt even through the second vote because - wait for it, they were promised better committee posts or other favors. No, say it isn't so! Not the new ethics reformer Lamar Smith!

http://www.southcoasttoday.com/daily/02-06/02-03-06/02world-nation.htm
Boehner victory influenced by outside events
A little over two weeks ago, Roy Blunt, R-Mo., declared the race for majority leader over. He released a statement announcing that a majority of Republicans had pledged support to him. It was publicity stunt, of course, an effort to turn an early lead into an invincible stampede. But he honestly believed he was on an unstoppable trajectory to victory.

(snip)
Blunt knew there were concerns about his ties to DeLay, K Street and the old guard. He assured members he had never done anything illegal or unethical. But he always returned the conversation quickly to what he believed was a member's bottom line. One of his first conversations was with Lamar Smith, a 10-term Texan whose state faced a monumental loss of clout with DeLay's departure. For almost 50 of the past 75 years, since John "Cactus Jack" Garner was elected minority leader in 1929, a Texan has held one of the top three House leadership posts. With DeLay's retreat, that influence was gone.

Trying to avoid appearances that he was trying to buy the election, Blunt not-so-subtly discussed a variety of priorities and concerns of the Texas members — without explicitly making promises or linking action to their vote. The message was clear: Texas would do just fine with Blunt in their corner. He spoke favorably of enhancing the clout of the delegation and in particular of Joe Barton, chairman of the Energy Committee. "We thought by going with Blunt ... that would help our situation," said Texas Rep. Mike Conaway. By the end of the first week, 14 of the 21 Texas Republicans were with Blunt. By the time he declared victory in mid-January, Blunt was certain he had 120 votes in the bag. (/snip)


This headline is laughable unless they think we're blind!
http://www.mysanantonio.com/news/politics/stories/MYSA020206.en.republicans.delay.64dd9051.html
House Republicans choose new leader with eye on restoring trust
Rep. Lamar Smith, R-San Antonio, said Texans backed Blunt because "he did a good job, and deserved to be the majority leader."


So there you go, one more piece of damming evidence that Lamar Smith is no more a ethics reformer than Bill O'Reilly is a journalist. Liar!

10-term Texan - That's just disgusting, that someone like Smith who does so little for his constituents, has been in Congress for 20 years taking up space.

Vote the culture of corruption out!

Sonia


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sonias Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 11:31 PM
Response to Original message
6. Lamar Smith hates clean air and clean water
HOME: FEBRUARY 24, 2006: NEWS: NAKED CITY
Naked City
• The League of Conservation Voters has released its annual National Environmental Scorecard, and as usual, the results aren't pretty for Texas' congressional delegation. Based on 20 selected votes considered particularly important by the LCV, Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison scored a sad 5% pro-environment ranking during 2005 … and she was our better senator. John Cornyn scored 0%. Of Austin's congressional delegation (scored on 18 votes), Democrat Lloyd Doggett was the best in Texas at 94%; lagging way, way behind were Republicans Michael McCaul, John Carter, and Lamar Smith (all zeroes). As a state, our House average was a pathetic 20%; if you remove the Democrats, it drops to 3%. Take out maverick Ron Paul (44%) and the GOP reps drop to 1.2%. – Lee Nichols
Text


Lamar is a zero!!

Sonia
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sonias Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 08:14 AM
Response to Original message
7. Smith's failure on education - Stop The Raid on Student Aid
As laid out by the Students with Courage

http://www.studentswithcourage.com/greatesthits.php
With our voices raised together, we shout:

"Lamar Smith, STOP THE RAID ON STUDENT AID!"

In the face of massive attacks on student aid and services, Lamar Smith has remained silent.

Sources:
(1) College Board/Chronicle of Higher Education (chronicle.com)
(2) Public Interest Research Group/Studentaidaction.com
(3) Daily Texan Online (www.dailytexanonline.com)

On Debt/Increasing College Costs

  1. Tuition has increased 66.5% since 2003 at the University of Texas at Austin. Tuition has increased over 110% since 1999.
  2. UT-Austin students will see a 9.6% tuition increase for the 2006-2007 school year. The average undergraduate student will pay more than $4,100 per semester.
  3. The average undergraduate borrower leaves college more than $17,000 in student loan debt, and law and medical students leave school with more than $65,000 loan debt, on average.
  4. 5 million students nationally receive federal financial aid to attend college.


On the Student Aid Cuts Supported by Rep. Smith in 2005
(FY2006 Budget)

  1. Included $12.7 Billion in cuts to student loan programs and made it more expensive to borrow by raising interest rates. TOTAL CUTS to Student Aid supported by Rep. Lamar Smith in 2006: $21 Billion
  2. Specifics of Budget Reconciliation Bill: $13 billion in cuts by increasing subsidy payments that student and parent borrowers make to lenders. This bill uses this money to pay for new tax cuts rather than sending it back to students through additional need-based grant aid or lower interest rates.
  3. Approximately $2 billion in cuts by increasing the parent loan interest rate from 7.9% to 8.5%.
  4. Increases Federal Stafford Loan interest rates and origination fees which are used by thousands of middle class students.
  5. Freezes Pell Grants at $4,050 for the third straight year and fails to adjust for inflation.


On the Proposed Student Aid Cuts Supported by House Republicans, Lamar Smith & Proposed by Pres. Bush
(FY2007)

  1. Proposes $1.7 Billion in cuts to higher education.
  2. Freezes Pell Grants for the 4th year in a row and again fails to adjust Pell Grants for inflation.
  3. Cuts the valuable LEAP Program (Leveraging Education Assistance Partnerships), which makes incentive grants to states to encourage need-based state grant programs.
  4. Cuts the TRIO programs that encourage individuals from disadvantaged backgrounds to enter and complete college.
  5. Cuts the Perkins Loan program that offers low interest loans to almost one million students.


1999 Official Title of Legislation:
H.AMDT.22 to HR 800: Amendment sought to provide that only schools in which at least 35 percent of the students come from low-income families may seek a waiver to use their Title I funds to operate school-wide projects.

Project Vote Smart's Synopsis:
Vote to adopt an amendment that allows schools to obtain a waiver if at least 35 percent of the students are from low-income families.
Rep. Smith voted NO on this amendment.


Throw the bum out!

Sonia

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Places » Texas Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC