I'm going to keep this thread case going up to election date. Feel free to join in or create your own cases against your Congressmen you want to unseat.
Today's exhibit is what the real reason Lamar Smith and most of the Texas republican congressional delegation supported Roy Blunt. Not that John Boehner is better than Blunt. They're the same corruption, just a different shade of lipstick on the pig.
('ll pronounce it boner -thank you Jon Stewart):rofl:
Smith and the gang of Texas republicans continued to support Roy Blunt even through the second vote because - wait for it, they were promised better committee posts or other favors. No, say it isn't so! Not the new ethics reformer Lamar Smith!
http://www.southcoasttoday.com/daily/02-06/02-03-06/02world-nation.htmBoehner victory influenced by outside events A little over two weeks ago, Roy Blunt, R-Mo., declared the race for majority leader over. He released a statement announcing that a majority of Republicans had pledged support to him. It was publicity stunt, of course, an effort to turn an early lead into an invincible stampede. But he honestly believed he was on an unstoppable trajectory to victory.
(snip)
Blunt knew there were concerns about his ties to DeLay, K Street and the old guard. He assured members he had never done anything illegal or unethical. But he always returned the conversation quickly to what he believed was a member's bottom line. One of his first conversations was with Lamar Smith, a 10-term Texan whose state faced a monumental loss of clout with DeLay's departure. For almost 50 of the past 75 years, since John "Cactus Jack" Garner was elected minority leader in 1929, a Texan has held one of the top three House leadership posts. With DeLay's retreat, that influence was gone.
Trying to avoid appearances that he was trying to buy the election, Blunt not-so-subtly discussed a variety of priorities and concerns of the Texas members — without explicitly making promises or linking action to their vote. The message was clear: Texas would do just fine with Blunt in their corner. He spoke favorably of enhancing the clout of the delegation and in particular of Joe Barton, chairman of the Energy Committee. "We thought by going with Blunt ... that would help our situation," said Texas Rep. Mike Conaway. By the end of the first week, 14 of the 21 Texas Republicans were with Blunt. By the time he declared victory in mid-January, Blunt was certain he had 120 votes in the bag. (/snip)
This headline is laughable unless they think we're blind!
So there you go, one more piece of damming evidence that Lamar Smith is no more a ethics reformer than Bill O'Reilly is a journalist. Liar!
10-term Texan - That's just disgusting, that someone like Smith who does so little for his constituents, has been in Congress for 20 years taking up space.
Vote the culture of corruption out!Sonia