Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

House rules address absolute authority (kicking Craddick)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Places » Texas Donate to DU
 
sonias Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 12:32 PM
Original message
House rules address absolute authority (kicking Craddick)
Postcards blog AAS 1/26/09
House rules address absolute authority


The kind of stand-off that occurred between then-Speaker Tom Craddick and the Texas House is unlikely to happen again under a draft of new House rules.

The rules are expected to be discussed by House members behind closed doors on Tuesday afternoon and debated publicly on Wednesday.

One provision addresses the so-called 'absolute authority' issue.

In 2007, Craddick refused to allow a vote on a motion to remove him. Under this draft, it makes it clear that such a motion is privileged and should be considered. If a speaker still refuses, the member can appeal to the full House by gathering 76 signatures.

:kick:

And in related news:
Postcards blog AAS 1/26/09
Fewer committees under proposed House rules

There are five fewer committees in the Texas House under the proposed new rules.

Government Reform is merged into State Affairs; Judiciary into Civil Jurisprudence; Law Enforcement into Criminal Jurisprudence and Law Enforcement; Local Government Ways and Means into Ways and Means; and Pensions and Investments is merged into Financial Services and Pensions.

Regulated Industries was eliminated and its duties spread over five committees. A new committee, Technology and Workforce Training, was created.

There will be 35 committees instead of the previous 40.

Packing them in!

I love that Craddick will have to vote on absolute authority! :bounce:


Sonia

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sonias Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-09 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. Well the "absoltue authority" got it's check today
AAS 1/29/08
TEXAS LEGISLATURE
With little squabbling, House OKs rules


By Laylan Copelin
AMERICAN-STATESMAN STAFF
Thursday, January 29, 2009

(snip)
Finally, in response to attempts in 2007 to remove Craddick as speaker, the House passed a rule saying a majority — 76 members — can remove a speaker.

Rep. Phil King, R-Weatherford, urged members to raise that number to 90, saying removing the speaker is an emotional vote that could jeopardize legislation. (Craddick himself supported that higher bar Wednesday.)

But Rep. Jim Keffer, an Eastland Republican and one of the leaders in the revolt against Craddick, disagreed.

"It's a problem to build a firewall around a speaker who's not doing his job," he said.

In the end, the House voted 87-60 to allow a majority to remove a speaker.

:woohoo:


Of course Craddick supported the hight (90 member) bar because he liked being dictator. What an Crad(DICK).

You win some, you lose some. Voter ID will not be blocked in the house. I expect we'll waste a lot of time once again this session on a stupid bill that does nothing to prevent voter impersonation fraud. But that was never the intent of the bill anyway. It's all about shaving 3-5 percentage points of the voters who happen to vote Democratic. :grr:



Sonia
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 02:24 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Places » Texas Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC