Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Feds to states: Don't privatize food stamps

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Places » Texas Donate to DU
 
sonias Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-01-09 10:09 AM
Original message
Feds to states: Don't privatize food stamps
We're looking at you Texas and Indiana!

AAS 12/01/09
Feds to states: Don't privatize food stamps
U.S. officials point to problems in Texas, Indiana.


Six years after Texas embarked on an ambitious social services outsourcing project that hit major problems, the federal agency in charge of food stamps is warning states against such efforts.

"These projects encountered severe problems in meeting critical performance standards and many eligible (food stamp) applicants have suffered as a result," says a Nov. 20 letter from the U.S. Department of Agriculture to the states. "We do not support furtherance of such projects, and believe that they put public funds and our clientele at risk."

The warning comes as the food stamp program is experiencing a recession-related surge across the country — and as Texas is negotiating a new contract with a private company that is already handling some aspects of enrollment. State officials said they don't expect the contract to be affected.

The message from federal officials to the states: We know these are tough times, but privatization isn't the answer.
(snip)
Texas in 2005 hired a group of companies led by Accenture LLP to run call centers enrolling Texans in programs such as food stamps and Medicaid. But the project, which stemmed from the 2003 legislation, hit training and technology problems — call center workers couldn't answer applicants' questions, and applicants got letters saying they hadn't submitted required paperwork, even though they had.


Good for the Feds!

Sonia
Refresh | +6 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
mbperrin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-01-09 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
1. Of course, Accenture is our old friend Arthur Andersen with a new
name. After Enron, what could go wrong?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
white cloud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-01-09 05:47 PM
Response to Original message
2. Thanks and a recommend, from Burnt Orange:
We respectfully request additional, immediate action by USDA to improve Texas SNAP performance. Without the strongest possible enforcement from the federal government, we are concerned that the State will not take the necessary steps to improve SNAP administration. In fact, despite the warning letter from your regional office, Governor Rick Perry and Texas' Legislative Budget Board recently refused to approve the Heath and Human Service Commission's request for 649 additional staff, approving only 250 new workers.

In these tough economic times, SNAP plays a vital role in increasing food security and ensuring that needy Americans can afford a nutritious diet. We respectfully ask that you inform us of the actions USDA takes. We would appreciate you promptly providing us with a timeline for additional actions to enforce the Food Stamp Act in Texas and to correct these serious deficiencies in SNAP administration.

Sincerely,

Rep. Lloyd Doggett
Rep. Eddie Bernice Johnson
Rep. Ruben Hinojosa
Rep. Al Green
Rep. Gene Green
Rep. Ciro Rodriguez
Rep. Chet Edwards
Rep. Silvestre Reyes
Rep. Solomon Ortiz
Rep. Henry Cuellar
Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee
Rep. Charles A. Gonzalez
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
sonias Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-01-09 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Good for them - notice it's only our Democratic delegation that cares
Maybe it's time the Federal government just outlawed state privatization of food stamp programs - period. If the state wants the money they have to play by the rules. They can not keep trying to cut corners to save a few dollars when people's lives are at stake.

Sonia
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
sonias Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-01-09 08:56 PM
Response to Original message
4. We're doing a sucky job on unemployment benefits as well
AAS 11/29/09
Texas slow to offer unemployment recipients a free alternative to debit cards

In August 2007, Texas became one of a growing number of states to distribute unemployment benefits by debit cards, making the mailing of paper checks a thing of the past.

Since then, the number of Texans receiving unemployment — 558,174 in October, a sixfold increase — has soared. So, presumably, have the bank fees earned by JPMorgan Chase, whose debit cards are now the only way Texans can get their unemployment benefits.

Consumer advocates are not happy about some debit card fees, and the U.S. Department of Labor wants states to provide an alternative guaranteed to cost those who are out of work nothing: direct deposit of their unemployment checks into their own banks. Texas has yet to do so.

"It's a disgrace," said Don Baylor, a policy analyst with the Center for Public Policy Priorities, a nonprofit group that advocates for low-income Texans.

Of the 32 states that now issue jobless benefits by debit card, only Texas does not offer direct deposit, paper checks or an automated system that lets recipients transfer benefits to their own bank accounts. These options are free to recipients, while debit cards incur fees if not used carefully.


Republican controlled Texas legislature - kicking the poor and underemployed every chance they get. Plus if there is any money to be made - make sure some private business gets a cut too!
:grr:

Sonia
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
hobbit709 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 07:44 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. When Donna was on unemployment last year.
She had to deal with Chase and that damn debit card.
1. The max cash you can take out on one day is $400, so you have to go to the nearest Chase 2 days in a row to get enough cash to deposit in your regular bank to cover the mortgage payment.
2. Two out of every three times she went, the ATM wasn't working-either out of order or out of cash, and they couldn't be bothered to put an out of order either on the display or tape a sign to the machine so you insert your card, punch in all the numbers and it asks you to reinput everything, then it tells you it isn't working.
3. When she went in the lobby to take out cash at the counter, they acted like they were doing her a big favor since she didn't have a regular account with them.
4. After she got a job, she left 38 cents in that debit card account just so they have to process it every month.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
sonias Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. That's a horror story hobbit
You should write your Congressman about this. Even though Donna is no longer with us, it would still be a good point to make. Tell him that you just saw the news about Texas and the debit cards.

Texas should offer a free way for unemployment to be deposited into the person's regular bank account.

This is freaking unbelievable. Well not really - we are talking about Texas republicans after all.

I wish this would become a national media issue and get more coverage. Unemployed Texans probably suffer in silence but it's just not right. :grr:


Sonia
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
jtrockville Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-01-09 11:08 PM
Response to Original message
5. Is there even one example of privatization benefiting anyone
other than the profit-takers?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
sonias Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. Nope - privatization = capitalism
And the almighty dollar and the bottom line is the main goal. Lives are expendable - so long as they aren't any of your stockholders/board members.


Sonia
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 05:13 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Places » Texas Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC