Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"It's not about 2010. It's about 2012. Trust me."

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Places » Texas Donate to DU
 
Dover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-15-10 01:57 PM
Original message
"It's not about 2010. It's about 2012. Trust me."
Edited on Mon Feb-15-10 02:23 PM by Dover



A year ago Rick Perry’s political future seemed to be in peril. Now he’s looking past the 2010 elections—and all the way to the White House.
Think I’m kidding?
How about a cup of tea?

Read article preview here: http://www.texasmonthly.com/preview/2010-02-01/feature

Tx. Monthly (access to full article requires subscription)
http://www.texasmonthly.com/2010-02-01
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
Dover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-15-10 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. Here's a link to the article preview (no subscription required) :
Edited on Mon Feb-15-10 02:25 PM by Dover


Right Place, Right Time

An exquisite sense of timing—and a good deal of luck—has helped transform Rick Perry from an unknown Democratic state legislator into a swaggering Republican who’s spent more years in the Governor’s Mansion than anyone in Texas history. Is it enough to carry him past Kay Bailey Hutchison and all the way to the White House?

by Paul Burka

One year ago, I wrote a story about the upcoming Republican gubernatorial primary between Governor Rick Perry and Senator Kay Bailey Hutchison. At the time, Hutchison had recently announced her intention to form a committee to explore a race for governor, and her campaign had released a poll showing her 24 points ahead of Perry, 55 percent to 31 percent. The governor’s political career appeared to be in deep trouble. Among Hutchison supporters, 58 percent had a “very favorable” opinion of her. Only 30 percent of Perry supporters felt the same way about him. She led him in every geographical section of the state.

What a difference a year makes. Since then, their fortunes have gone in opposite directions. Perry has held a lead, typically in the low double digits, in almost every poll taken since early summer, and now it is Hutchison’s political career that is in peril: Her Senate term expires on January 1, 2013, and she has said she will not seek reelection. Meanwhile, Perry’s prospects have never been rosier. Just a year after it appeared that he was on the brink of his last race, he is poised to become one of the leaders of his party. His travel schedule, speaking engagements, and television appearances in recent months give every indication that he and his team of advisers are looking beyond Texas to national politics. If Perry defeats Hutchison in the March 2 Republican primary and goes on to win a third full term in November, he will immediately join the crowd of potential presidential aspirants in 2012—if he hasn’t done so already...cont'd

http://www.texasmonthly.com/preview/2010-02-01/feature






(full article requires subscription)
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
sonias Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-15-10 03:17 PM
Response to Original message
2. Burka is my problem
He's a Perry Pimp. He was way too giddy with excitement when Medina fell off the cliff. He probably wanted to join Glenn Beck in that french kiss of Perry.

Texas Observer 2/11/10
The Medina Flap: Paul Burka French Kisses Glenn Beck

(snip)
The more interesting thing, to me, has been the swift and shocked response from the conservative establishment — led, as usual, by Paul Burka, the Texas Monthly blogger, who dashed off a post headlined, "Medina self-destructs on Glen Beck radio show," his fingers flying so fast that he didn't take the time to spell Beck's first name correctly.

Why did Medina's silly answer about something that has nothing to do with governing Texas mean that she had "self-destructed"? Burka didn't explain (fingers, again, perhaps flying too fast). The things Medina very clearly stands for — nullification and eliminating property taxes, to name two biggies — are sufficiently radical that you wouldn't think her supporters would be especially put off by the fact that she wouldn't take a definitive position on "trutherism."

As usual, one of Burka's commenters made more sense than the man himself: "Anonymous" wrote, "Seriously – how is flirting with 911 truthers considered 'self destructive' when Medina and Perry are openly embracing secessionists, separatists, and people who threaten violence because of their fringe views? Who is deciding what is acceptable and what isn’t? 911 truthers just litter internet message boards with their garbage. There are actual people bringing guns to rallies and presidential speeches and calling for secession. Why isn’t that self destructive?"


Burka got to rally the troops around his pretty boy. I don't take too much stock in what Paul Burka says. And neither do conservative voters in Texas. In fact I'm not sure who Burka's audience is?


Sonia
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Dover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-15-10 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Hmmm...hadn't heard any of that (don't pay any attention to Beck and pundits in general).
Edited on Mon Feb-15-10 03:44 PM by Dover
I find it interesting that the whole 911 issue is being used as a litmus test this season. Where was that question in the last two elections?
To me (who still has huge questions about that momentous event that remain unanswered...and probably always will) I find it more of a question of who is 'establishment' or status quo and who is not?

But it seems that the real incentive for bringing it up at all is to continue to stigmatize and marginalize those who question 911. Perhaps the pending trial has reinvigorated this debate, though I seriously doubt that the 'truth' will out.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
sonias Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-15-10 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. "Where was that question in the last two elections"
Wrapped around the g.w. bush' ass. No way the Texas pundits, Perry pimps or the R party are going to criticize "their president".

Look at it this way, if 9/11 had happened on Obama's watch, they would be all over the demanding "the truth". But since this happened on their watch and under bush' fat nose, well anyone who questions it, is "un-American", "crazy" or "anti-bush". And they'll have none of that!

You're right, none of it will ever come out. Obama doesn't care to look backward, and the Rs prefer to lie about history and claim there was no major attack on U.S. soil during the bush years. :crazy:

Sonia
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Dover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-15-10 04:40 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. True dat! But it seems that Dems are also trying to distance themselves
from the questions or association with those who question. Of course they're 'damned if they do, damned if they don't'. By agreeing with the
'911 truthists', Dems are being set up to be stigmatized, and by denying the '911 truthists' and sticking with the official story they are inadvertently (or purposesly) protecting anyone from inside the government (or allies/private sector) who might have been involved in 911.

I think by making the current trial 'public' there is an attempt to
make it look as though there's nothing to hide and truth will prevail.
But, of course, it will be a sham as well. I can't imagine anyone in
government (or the private sector for that matter) would find it in their best interest to air such dirty laundry for all to see. Not to mention making themselves vulnerable to all the legal ramifications...

I believe the truth will set us free. But getting to it is another matter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 11:51 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Places » Texas Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC