Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Beazley joins chorus against sedition laws

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Places » Australia Donate to DU
 
Violet_Crumble Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-05 04:29 AM
Original message
Beazley joins chorus against sedition laws
Federal Opposition Leader Kim Beazley has added his voice to the growing chorus of concern over proposed changes to sedition laws, saying they are unnecessary and vague.

The Government introduced an update to the offence of sedition, making it illegal to "promote ill will and hostility between different groups", as part of its anti-terrorism package introduced to parliament two weeks ago.

Victorian Premier Steve Bracks and Queensland Premier Peter Beattie have said the change makes the law too broad and threatens free speech. The Law Council of Australia shares their concerns.

Mr Beazley said the change had arrived out of left-field. It was not foreshadowed during Prime Minister John Howard's discussion with state and territory leaders in September.

"It's not necessary. It's got nothing to do with dealing with terrorists, frankly, so why put it in?" he told Southern Cross radio in Melbourne.

http://www.theage.com.au/news/national/beazley-joins-chorus-against-sedition-laws/2005/11/13/1131816835655.html
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
velvet Donating Member (950 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-05 09:36 AM
Response to Original message
1. "different groups" ?
Like what, footie teams?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Matilda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-05 06:49 PM
Response to Original message
2. There's also a clause against anyone "holding the Queen up to hatred
or contempt".

About half the population of this country holds the office of monarch
in contempt, but if we say so, we could be arrested? Get a life,
Johnny.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Generarth Donating Member (309 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-21-05 05:03 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. so it's sedition now
to give the old aristocratic tart with the handbag and corgis a hard time now is it? What about that imbecilic and murdering swine Prince Phillip?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 03:12 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Places » Australia Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC