Some of Richard Hayes Phillips Ohio doc. down due to hacking, revision

Richard Hayes Phillips detailed analysis of vote irregularities and voter suppression is part of the core case that Arnebeck is filing tomorrow. Richard has produced documentation of widespread Systematic Voter Suppression as well as vote errors and irregularities and strong indications of fraud or hacking in several Ohio Counties.
Both his computer and web site have been under attack by hackers and a few of his pages are currently down for revision and reoganization. But most of the documentation an still be found there at http://web.northnet.org/minstrel/alpage.htm
The pages that are down now will be up again tomorrow. He's changing computers.

Documentation that Kerry won Ohio
http://web.northnet.org/minstrel/supreme.htm
(very old version: http://web.northnet.org/minstrel/uncounted.htm)

Strong Evidence of fraud in Miami County, Ohio
http://web.northnet.org/minstrel/miami.htm

High undercounts in Kerry precincts and low undercounts in Bush precincts in Cincinati
http://web.northnet.org/minstrel/cincinnati.htm

Indications of Fraud in several Ohio counties
www.flcv.com/fraudioh.html

Indications of possible ballot box stuffing in S.W. Ohio counties
http://www.flcv.com/swohio.html
http://web.northnet.org/minstrel/warren.htm

Favoritism in the Suburbs http://web.northnet.org/minstrel/suburbs.htm

Stealing Votes in Cleveland & Columbus http://web.northnet.org/minstrel/cleveland.htm
http://web.northnet.org/minstrel/columbus.htm

(and more)

So don't flood him with emails. I'm making sure that he gets any important info from DU.



---- You too, can be a DU handler ----

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=201&topic_id=4549&mesg_id=7040&page=

I think that in addition to his own analysis, he could really use Joe Knapp's help in preparing graphics.

If you look at the graphics posted by jmknapp you will see that they are immediately understandable and very powerful, a door opener to show the show the judge.

The problem with the more esateric studies is that I have seen outragous "debunkings" where they set up a straw man and knocked it down, that really did nothing to invalidate the study in question, but evidently people did not understand the study very well in the first place, so they also took the "debunking" at face value.

The beauty of Joe's maps and machine troughput studies is that they are so readily understood they are not going to be considered "debunked" just because some joker says so.

I agree about Joe's maps.

Richard has really been focusing on stuff for the trial, but if Joe wants to generate maps and such, I can definitely provide him with some raw data, and I can ask Richard for some of his data as well. He'll have to build some geographic databases up for other counties, though -- Richard is tackling as many as he can get his hands on.