Is the MSM "waiting" for something big and solid for them to join in?

My father in law, who has been in Democratic politics most of his adult life, even ran for congress once but lost in Oklahoma, said that he "heard" that the MSM was waiting to go after this story until something "big" came out. Now I don't know who he "heard" it from, but it is interesting that he even mentioned it since I have been trying to convince him of election fraud and have shown him quite a bit of "evidence" from these boards that I've gotten to convince him. (evidence is in quotes because so far with the exception of the Arnebeck case, it isn't legally evidence yet, as far as being entered into evidence).

Just a thought as I thought his comment was interesting given the MSM silence.

during the election cycle such as Rathergate and other stories, they will wait for substantial proof and evidence before they report on it. Since they were the ones who paid for the exit polls and probably have more information from Mitosky them has been released, they can not base there reports on the difference in the exit polls which they were part of.

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

?

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

argues that at least 130,656 votes were stolen from Kerry and given to Bush by means of high-tech vote stealing. How could it be done? Cell-phone technology can be used to contact modems in the voting machines to change tallies. Anyone who can hack into a Windows-based PC can hack into a central tabulator and alter the vote totals by as much as they wish. Programs can be written into punch card readers, optical scan readers, and touchscreen machines that will flip as many votes as needed from Kerry to *. Way more than enough votes to win Ohio were stolen by means of high-tech vote fraud, refusing to count acceptable provisional ballots, suppressing the votes of 10,000's of voters, and intimidating voters. If we really lived by the Voting Rights legislation Ohio would re-vote, allowing for all registered voters to cast a vote on a paper ballot.

Just because the margin wasn't close does NOT mean that it was not stolen. I used to believe that was true, but now we have evidence that it is not. If the Florida programmer Clinton Curtis could write software that would ensure that the candidate of choice got at least 51% of the votes -- it would be easy to make sure that they got 53% or 56% -- some nice total that would make everyone very, very testy at the prospect of 100% hand recounts (which is exactly what needs to be done in Ohio).

:kick:

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

when I questioned the router, the response I got was "this is only so it can be part of our internal network, our main database, so everyone can have access to it...only in this office though"

I then asked how their LAN was connected to the Internet. They had no clue. I asked if they used XP, Terminal Services, Linux, Novel....no one "knew" what I was talking about.

I did see the Novel startup screen however during a point of the machine recount.

Stupid people...if any computer in the "internal office" was connected to the Internet, so was that dang tabulation CPU. Stupid.

Yeah that was added to my report I submitted on the recount.

on edit typo fixed

I think most people, not just the MSM, are waiting for something big to happen before they jump on the bandwagon. This is the part that really frustrates me. Just keep spreading the word and telling everybody you know about election fraud. That's what I'm doing.

:toast:

Look, this is the reality of the situation. The holiday season is upon us. This week is essentially over on Wed-Thur. Then we roll into another short week before New Years. After that, you've got a small window of news opportunity before the Bush is sworn in. Days will roll into weeks.. and weeks into months. Before you know it, we'll be focussed on the next election and new candidates.

...and they will be focused on repealing the 22nd amendment!!

NO better time than NOW!

We are gaining momentum! We ARE making it into the mainstream, both print and on TV. We can NOT let this go.

'Keep hope alive!' And each of us, do ANYTHING we can on a daily basis...even if it's just making a bumper sticker (on your printer) and displaying it, or starting Election Fraud conversations everywhere you go...be it sitting on a bus, or in your workplace lunchroom, or the doctor's office.

Most people sense something was wrong with election, they just need encouragement to get their momentum rolling.

BREAK a story that hasn't been discovered by bloggers or our left wing allies on the Internetsses.

It was about the protestors at the Republican convention - incredible! It said there were, like half a million people in the streets protesting. (Don't quote me on that number, but it was definitely huge.) I couldn't believe the film they were showing of the streets just absolutely FILLED with people.

MSM reported that there were protestors, and reported about them being detained longer than they should have, but looking back on it now that I've seen the pictures of just HOW MANY people protested, I see that MSM chose not to report it responsibly. There is NO WAY that those guys even attempted to reflect in their reports the reality that was happening in the streets.

So, as much as we would like to think that MSM will someday report this, I don't think they will. They are part of it. Don't ask me when they got bought, but they are signed, sealed and delivered IMO.

But I have heard that EVERYWHERE bush goes, there are throngs protesting, and we never see it. What do we have to do to ensure we get the MSM attention?

Getting their attention isn't the issue. They are seeing these things and choosing NOT to report them. Not to be overdramatic, but they are the opposition. They are entrenched in maintaining the status quo. Until their bread is no longer buttered by the RW, nothing will change. So where does that leaves us?

I am just thinking of MSM coverage of protests in the past. It seems unless someone was killed or wounded during a protest, they didn't get much coverage. Think Kent State, Lynette "Squeaky" Fromme,et al.

While I agree that they are playing it supersafe before breaking headlines with regard to election fraud, they also are scared to death of KKKarl. They know that if they break the story and Bush prevails, they can kiss their White House access goodbye. They won't be able to get an interview with a JANITOR after that.

What the MSM does at this point, or case in point Does not do.

When they started covering J-Lo and Ben as breaking news it was laughable.

Brittany and her beau of eloping

Michael Jackson

I want news that relates to the plight of the world, not the tribulations of the entertainment industry. They have a news org for that. E-News ect.

By the time they get on board I feel they will have lost their market.

They think that feeding us this pablum will distract and neutralize us...sure seems to be working if you look at the masses

I was perplexed about the coverage of Gore and Bush during Campaign2000: it seemed MSM constantly lied about Gore and never told the truth about Bush. Now I know why...

Until the few wealthy, neo-Con fascists surrender control of the MSM, they will ALWAYS report what their masters tell them to. And when will the neo-Con fascists give up their ownership of the MSM? How about "never!"

The only chance we have resides in the work of small, independent "alternative" news outlets, and the Internet.

But forget CBS, ABC, NBC, CNN, FOX. They're hopeless...

CBS="Cock & Bull Story"
ABC="Another Bush Crony"
NBC="Neverending Bush Cheerleader"
CNN="Censorship for the Neo-Nazis"
FOX="Full Of Xhit!"
NPR="New Presstitudes for Republicans"

At a meeting held 11/15 in Columbus, Ohio where I gave sworn testimony as to what
I saw before, on, and right after the election person after person said I pushed the button for Kerry and the light went on for bush. That got NO COVERAGE nationally and just a whisper on pg 6 of the metro section of the local paper. Not one local
station reported that story either. They did talk to the local head of the BOE who was
also head of the repug party before his current job. He is also responsible for the lack of voting machines in democratic areas. The press gave good coverage to his lies i.e. statements.

We are fucked. The recount here is as dirty as the election.

:kick:

I thought journalists were supposed to seek the truth and report it. It seems like the journalists these days are a bunch of lazy hacks who won't report anything unless it falls in their laps.

Where are the Woodward and Bernsteins of today? Where are the "young guns" who want to make their mark and break this story wide open?

It is disgusting the way the media panders to Shrub and his cronies. They are so afraid of upsetting "the boy king".

Fuck the MSM.

...so that you had to "convince" him. And does he admit now that you convinced him? I have had the same problem with my father. He is a lifelong Dem, too, with an MS in Poli-Sci, whose career was with the state government. He tells me that there has always been fraud and that it has been traditionally dealt with by individual states and precincts (lecturing me as if I were so naive, and as if this justifies what is happening!) and that Kerry conceded, so we should accept it and move one. VERY FRUSTRATING...

I have at least planted a seed, and I think the biggest thing for him has been the PDF file of the first Arnebeck suit as he is a lawyer by training (and an economist as well who practices in economic development now)

I'm still waiting for him to be "on board" don't know if he will.

..of election fraud and MSM coverage of it since there are thousands of people with knowledge of the fraud, ranging from low wage temp workers hired during the week before the election and low paid technicians to CEO's of large companies. With the million dollar reward just announced, we should see some concrete evidence of fraud any day now.

Is this another Freeper lie exposed?

link please

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

ANd protest the MSM--go out on luch to your local Tv Station with a sign--Or if you're in the NYC or DC, you can do this---

http://www.51capitalmarch.com/

Details are going up here---

http://www.51capitalmarch.com/cgi-bin/yabb/YaBB.pl?board=New_Jersey

you can count on that.

Outfront - taking risks - fact checking - delivering a quality product... check your local McDonald's, the fry guy/gal has it locked up!

Orders.

or who?

evidence as well? (besides the fact that NO one is covering it extensively)

I think Olberman was tapped. Remember his very first words on the subject were to "debunk" the media lockdown. And his coverage was pretty tame at best and is now becoming less and less prominent in his news casts (although he is giving it some ink in his blog).

Clinton Gore bashing, stolen election in 2000, BushCo's big lies before during and after 9/11, lies about Iraq and WMD'S etc.

Now, some MSM outlets are just plain spineless, but most follow the big MSM guns and they get their marching orders direct from the evil-doers.

But if there is a coup-within-a-coup, those orders may change.

Just don't hold your breath...

The MSM wants the Booosh** regime to stay in power.

We have two foes with too much power. If we bring one into ruin, the other will follow.

and block the motorcade on January 20th.

Both you and your father in law have too much faith in the MSM. Look at all we have been through in the last 10 years - The Clinton/Lewinski witch hunts, Bush Election theft 2000, the build-up to the Iraq War, and of course the last presidential election and probable theft.

Look at it logically - Big Business (Corporations) are always searching for a way to make the most money. The MSM are owned by big business. Republicans are friendly to Big Business. Therefore, Big Business are friendly to Republicans.

Remember in Michael Moore's "Fahrenheit 911" the footage of the 2000 Inaguration Parade protest and the Congressional Black Caucus pleading for a Senator to speak up? Most people I know were shocked by this footage because it wasn't seen on the MSM while it was happening. Look at what is happening now - the Conyers hearings for example - that also has not make the MSM.


The bottom line - Don't trust the MSM and don't expect them to do the right thing.

It's obvious that the media treads lightly when it comes to reporting negative stories (the truth) about Bush and the RW. This administration is venomous and demanding with the press. If they ask tough, fair questions--they are denied access and interviews with key WH players evaporate.

There have been countless stories of the WH calling up reporters and telling them that they were unhappy with coverage. Michael Moore reported that a "Today" journalist told him that Cheney wrote a personal letter to the journalist's boss. Cheney indicated that he "didn't like the reporter's tone". The journalist was admonished and told to change. GEEEZ!

Journalism is a for-profit business. BushCo blackmails the media--you cover us positively and you get the stories and the ratings. You displease us and you will suffer.

I imagine, that even though the media kow tows to these thugs--that they hate them with a white-hot passion.

I agree with the other posters that the media is waiting for iron-clad proof of fraud before they cover the story seriously. Part of that is due to Rathergate, but most of it is due to BushCo's blackmailing of the press.

DO the same in Philly--Chicago then SAn Fran ETC.

http://www.51capitalmarch.com/

WAnt to me meet me in NYC? Lemme know:

roger@51capitalmarch.com

editorial today ..discussion on other string

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=203x180158

but it is well after the fact and it is very likely that * will be sworn in for his second term next month.

Anyone see Washington Journal's interview with the Bob Edwards this morning? He left NPR recently for a new program on XM satellite radio. A caller asked why the MSM is not covering the recount in Ohio.

Mr. Edwards response? "Will it change the outcome of the presidential election?"

WHAT THE HELL?

The sanctity of the voting process matters not a whit!!!!