Rossi says 3,539 'extra' votes in King County! Email Rossi about Ohio!

Fuck you Rossi. Live by the sword....

terror threats or perhaps another OBL tapes. Which will it be this time? they gotta silence this guy.

Stick a fork in it. It's done.

Seriously, I think some consistency is called for here. Election fraud should be a bi-partisan issue as the right to vote is one of our most dear rights.

Rossi has taken hypocracy to a whole new level. Someone needs to make a tape of all his "advice" to Gregoire when he thought he had won and play it over and over to him until he gets the picture.

Here is the text of my letter:

Mr. Vance,

I quote from today's Seattle PI:

State Republican Party Chairman Chris Vance said King County officials are "in defense mode" and dragging their feet.

"If King County can't explain it, this could be the bombshell that blows up the election," Vance said. "This is the most glaring thing that we've see so far, if it is not adequately explained. You got more votes than you've got people."

You might want to be very careful using words like "bombshell". In the state of Ohio there have been numerous counties and precincts that had a tremendous amout of over voting. In several precints there was 1700% voter turnout! In your zeal to find just a few more votes for Mr. Rossi, you might end up losing the election for Mr. Bush.

People, we need to get the MSM interested in those 'extra' votes in King County. They are making a huge stink of it (the rethugs) so we need to make sure that Ohio gets talked about too...

in WA the 3K votes irregularity, if true and corrected, would definitely tip the election. In OH, all the irregularities that were mentioned taken together would not have tipped the election.

As for getting MSM interested in those "extra" votes in King county - be careful what you wish for. You will install a Republican governor in WA and (see 1st paragraph) will not cause much difference in OH Bush margin.

is completely investigated that the votes won't "tip" to Kerry????

I said all the documented irregularities do not tip the election.

..tens of thousands of votes could have been moved from the Kerry to Bush column, remember take 60,000 from * and move them to Kerry and he wins Ohio.

118,000 is a drop in the bucket.

and the "Fraud" hasn't been exposed - yet.

maybe a full investigation into the "Fraud" will land your Repukes in jail where they belong!!!!!!!!!!!!

how can he assume those extra 3500 votes weren't votes for him?

Edit: got Rossi's sex wrong LOL

Then they'll make sure they cheat better the second time.

I'd betcha those overvotes are Repug votes.

doesn't he look dashing in his lovely new hat
:tinfoilhat: :tinfoilhat: :tinfoilhat:

Those wild conspiracy people , its such a shame
can't they just GET OVER IT and MOVE ON!!!!

I thought he wanted a revote.

Or is this about throwing enough shit in the hope that something will stick?

Call me cynical. :eyes:

to try to find a way to contest the election.

we could say the same about someone we all know.

because it doesn't favor a Republican. Yet, they wish to put a spot light on this for a Governers race because it has the potential to benefit a Republican.

Fascism is here...

To: editpage@seattlepi.com
Subject: Recounting Votes

If Mr. Rossi is so concerned about the possibility of extra votes, I would greatly appreciate it if he would contact the Republican members of the House and Senate and ask them to reject the Ohio electoral votes on January 6, 2005. At least the Washington recounts appear to have been done in an honest way, while Ohio's recount violated state law repeatedly and thus has no validity. Ohio, New Mexico, and Florida all had plenty of extra votes in the election: curiously enough most seem to favor Mr. Bush. In those states, there are also lots of uncounted votes: perhaps Mr. Rossi would like to urge that they be counted as well. Finally, there is solid evidence that at least 3.5 million extra votes across the country magically appeared for Mr. Bush.

I would happily trade another recount in Washington State - counting all the votes, including the ones he didn't want counted before he lost - for a thorough investigation and an honest recount across the United States. The 2004 Election was a mockery of democracy, and I hope all Republicans, Democrats, and Independents will join forces to contest it, and to prevent election fraud from ever happening again.

They'll never publish it, but what the hell, it was fun to write. :evilgrin:

all across the country (and to the Senate and Congress)

Why has the Repuke SOS put them on lock-down until Jan 10th here, but the Repukes in WA can get access to their voter logs??

This is important. Where do you get the information that the Ohio records are on lockdown until January 10th?

I remember reading the posts where the poll books were taken from folks in Greene county on Dec. 10th and they were told that Blackwell said the records were on "lockdown". However, I have not been able to find anything which speaks to how long that lockdown was to last.

If you can point me to any source that says how long the records are locked down it can help with something I'm working on.

Thanks

and that Blackwell was not allowing anyone to look at any of the log books unitl January 10th. Maybe on the Green's web? I'll look around and see if I can find out where I read it and get back to you.

I Googles myself silly yesterday. LOL!

I know I read that in one county the observers were told they couldn't see the poll books until after January 10th, but in most other counties they were allowed to see them.

However, I'm not sure those stories relate to an official lockdown announcement since the original reported announcement seemed to be referring to the status of the poll books as public record. Letting witnesses to a recount see them has nothing to do with them being public record.

My question is if anyone has proof of how long the records were to be considered locked down from public record by Blackwell.

Thanks - I'll keep looking and post when I find it. May I ask what you are looking for?

Is it possible that the software was at fault?

We will all lose if we do not prove that the election
was not safe anywhere.

this is not mine>>>>>
http://home.earthlink.net/~acisney4/id2.html

They won't get away with it. Gregoire was certified yesterday. If they push this we will be able to make our arguement about Ohio, and call into question their certified electors with a more meaningful arguement. Even the Republicans can't have it both ways, can they?

n/t