We hear how congress doesn't want to look bad. Evidence has to be the reason. Look what congress did when the photos of Abu Gharib came out. There was no caring the Repubs were going to stomp all over the Dems. The Democrats were not wimps over this and stood up and slammed this incident home to all. They had pictures. We need hard evidence and not just exit polls of fraud.
2. easier to say it was just antedotal -as Linda Cheves just did no Fox
there was a brief discussion on Tony Snow a bit ago. David Corn from the NATION was on also. Cheves said Dems were sore losers and what happened with the cert. proecess in Congress just appealed to the Radical left. Snow was dismisive.
I think I've been mis-informed on the definition of 'evidence', and Abu Gharib clears that up for me a bit. If there were no pictures there would have been no Abu Gharib. What I don't get is why the threshold is so high for govt and so low for the rest of us. What also bothers me is the complacency of these peoples cohorts. How ignorant are average govt workers?
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.