Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Citizen's Alliance for Secure Elections (CASE)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
Clinton Crusader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-04 09:57 AM
Original message
Citizen's Alliance for Secure Elections (CASE)
This may be a re hash of already known info, but this is a group I hadn't come across as of yet. The nonpartisan Citizen's Alliance for Secure Elections (CASE) is investigating various other voting irregularities in Ohio
--------------------------------
http://www.dissidentvoice.org/Nov2004/Fitrakis1108.htm
By Bob Fitrakis

* In Miami County, Ohio, with 100% of the precincts reporting at 9am
EST Wednesday, Nov. 3, Bush had 20,807 votes (65.80%) and Kerry had
10,724 (33.92%). Miami reported 31,620 voters. Inexplicably, nearly
19,000 new ballots were added after all precincts reported, boosting
Bush's vote to 33,039 (65.77%) to Kerry's 17,039 (33.92%). CASE is
investigating why the percentage of the vote stayed exactly the same
to 3/100ths of a percentage point after nearly 19,000 new ballots were
added. CASE members speculate that it's either a long-shot coincidence
with the last three digits remaining the same, or that someone had
pre-set a database and programmed a voting machine to cough up a
pre-set percentage of votes. Miami County uses an easily hackable
optical scanner with the central counter provided by the
Republican-linked vendor ES&S.

* In rural Drake County, Kerry received 78 less votes than Al Gore in
2000, but Bush received 3000 more votes. Drake is the only county in
Miami Valley where Kerry's votes was less than Gore's and where Bush's
vote rose dramatically.

* 102,134 of the provisional ballots, nearly two-thirds (65.7%) in
all probability come from solidly pro-Kerry areas and are most likely
cast by pro-Kerry supporters such as African Americans and the
poor...Palast also points to the 92,672 so-called "spoiled" ballots in
Ohio that have yet to be counted, and may never be tallied...By
Blackwell directing county Boards of Elections not to count the
provisional ballots for 11 days, it benefited the Bush campaign since
an immediate counting would have no doubt made the race tigher between
Kerry and Bush, and perhaps prompted Kerry to request a recount. This
would have the 92,672 discarded "spoiled" ballots that were also
likely to favor Kerry.

* The Republican Party sent letters challenging thousands of
Franklin County registered voters who requested absentee ballots.
Franklin County is home to ... Ohio State U., thousands of local
students go to schools outside the county or state. The GOP targeted
young voters for challenges. The GOP pre-challenged an estimated
35,000 voters..The GOP sent registered letters to registered voters'
addresses and when they failed to pick up a letter from the Republican
Party in primarily Democratic areas, they were challenged for fraud.
<more>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NVMojo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-04 10:00 AM
Response to Original message
1. beside just flat out targeting a group, I can't help but think
that college students were targeting because of the Michael Moore connection.

These Repukes better get some lessons from karma soon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-04 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
2. Question regarding the last paragraph about Franklin County
Do I understand this correctly...

In this county, a home to a lot of students...

The Repub Party challenged their request for a ballot by sending letters? (Is this how it works?)

The number of voters challenged was 35,000?

Then, when they failed to pick up registered letters REQUESTING THEM TO PICK UP A LETTER FROM THE REPUBLICAN PARTY?, they were challenged (ACCUSED?) of fraud?

I still don't think I understand?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 08:22 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC