Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Sunday 2/27 Election Fraud, Reform, & Updates Thread

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
MelissaB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 09:51 AM
Original message
Sunday 2/27 Election Fraud, Reform, & Updates Thread
In order to organize and document I thought it would be a good idea to have a daily thread to place items related to reform, fraud, protests, and other items. This also make it easier to "catch up" when we are away from the computer for a while.

Please help us. If you see something that isn't here post it with a link to the thread and a thanks to the author. Thanks to everyone who is helping with this project.


Link to the thread from yesterday: http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=203x334888#335316
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MelissaB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
1. Editorial: Let the voters vote

Let the voters vote


Possibly the most important lesson learned from the 2004 presidential election is that showing up at the wrong precinct should not disenfranchise an otherwise qualified voter.
But that's precisely what happened to many of the 35,379 Ohioans - including 3,122 here in Lucas County - whose provisional ballots were rejected after the Nov. 2 election. Their votes should have been counted but weren't.

Now it is up to the General Assembly to correct this miscarriage of democracy by aligning state law with the federal Help America Vote Act, which was intended to prevent such lapses.

A hearing on provisional voting was held Wednesday in Columbus by the U.S. Election Assistance Commission. One of the witnesses was Kay Maxwell, president of the Ohio League of Women Voters, who said, "We felt strongly that individuals who ended up in their so-called wrong precinct ... should have been able to cast ballots for president and vice president and any statewide offices. If it's a problem for even a couple of people, then it's a problem that needs solving."

More: http://toledoblade.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20050227/OPINION02/502270355/-1/OPINION
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MelissaB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
2. THE GOP 'VALUES' TRAP

THE GOP 'VALUES' TRAP


February 27, 2005 -- SOCIAL conservatives, riding high on the wave of the 2004 elections, have convinced themselves that it was values and values alone that put President Bush over the top. This may give Democrats a great opportunity to bounce back in 2006 and '08.

"I want to make sure that there are no revisionists here among us," said Ken Blackwell, Ohio's secretary of State, at the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) last weekend. "The reality is that the values voters won Ohio and won the presidency for George Bush."

Let's start revising. First, take the myth that "values" (code for gay marriage) was the key issue last year. In fact, while exit polls showed 22 percent of voters identifying "moral values" as their "most important issue," the folks who said "Iraq" or "terrorism" add up to 34 percent.

>>>snip

What's more, Barone isn't terribly confident that voters, young or old, can be won over simply by making them into investors as some Republicans, intent on expanding an "investor class" through the privatization of Social Security, believe they can do.

"If you're in New York, you know there are a lot of investors who are voting for Democrats on social issues," he said.

At some point, the Republican Party is going to have to revise its strategy to deal with this reality.

More: http://www.nypost.com/postopinion/opedcolumnists/40402.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MelissaB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
3. Election filmmakers swing with Ohio vote

Election filmmakers swing with Ohio vote


By John Horn

Los Angeles Times


Documentary filmmakers James Stern and Adam Del Deo traveled to Ohio last November in search of a specific election story. When the presidential voting was completed, they ended up with a very different movie.

Stern and Del Deo, each of whom voted for Sen. John F. Kerry, the Democratic Party nominee, initially traveled to the battleground state to document how thousands of Republican poll watchers would challenge Ohio voters. The two filmmakers were among scores of show-business personalities parachuting into swing states in support of the Democratic ticket.

I was outraged by the poll challengers, says Stern, whose producing credits include Michael Jordan to the Max and both the upcoming drama Proof and basketball documentary The Year of the Yao.

When the imagined drama of Kerry supporters being barred from voting didnt materialize, Stern and Del Deo decided not to leave Ohio. Instead, almost overnight, they shifted the focus of Ohio: An American Vote, dispatching their camera crews, which ultimately numbered 18, to record all aspects of the final campaign push in the elections most important state.

>>>snip

They hope to have a rough assembly later this month and will then schedule a dozen follow-up interviews. When those conversations are added, Stern and Del Deo will begin showing the film to potential distributors.

More: http://www.fortwayne.com/mld/journalgazette/living/11007153.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MelissaB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
4. It's never too early to run for president

It's never too early to run for president
Republican hopefuls try to position themselves as party's next big player


Stewart M. Powell, Hearst Newspapers

Sunday, February 27, 2005

Washington -- In the Beltway version of "the cat's away, the mice will play," President Bush's prospective Republican successors were busy last week getting their 2008 presidential campaigns started while Bush was traveling in Europe.

Political activists in Iowa, New Hampshire and South Carolina -- states hosting the first three contests for the GOP presidential nomination in 2008 - - saw the first stirrings of the intramural Republican contest that will play out over the next three years before voters start casting ballots in the nomination struggle in January 2008. Many of the contenders are staging appearances and scheduling speeches at local Republican fund-raisers.

>>>snip

The 2008 election will be the first time that both Republicans and Democrats have wide-open fields for their presidential nominations since 1952.

"It's going to be a free-for-all on both sides," says Sabato.

More: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2005/02/27/MNG31BGDJ51.DTL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MelissaB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 10:39 AM
Response to Original message
5. The vote you cast may not be tallied: 1 out of 100 shown uncounted in 2004

The vote you cast may not be tallied
1 out of 100 shown uncounted in 2004


Vicki Haddock, Insight Staff Writer

Sunday, February 27, 2005

You read the newspapers, watch the candidates' debates, mull the issues with friends, and then you do your democratic duty:

You vote.

Or you think you vote.

Perhaps your ballot gets jammed in an overstuffed machine, or is accidentally shipped to a warehouse, or gets miscounted due to human or computer error. Maybe it is spit out because of a dangling chad or a stray dot of ink, or because your signature is loopier than when you registered. Ballots even get tossed into the trash -- it has happened.

Chances are you'll never even know you were disenfranchised.

This reality is part of the rationale behind legislation proposed by Democratic Sens. Barbara Boxer of California, Hillary Clinton of New York and John Kerry of Massachusetts to require dozens of reforms including required random recounts and a paper trail on electronic voting. The legislation has a wonderfully idealistic name: the Count Every Vote Act.

Much more: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2005/02/27/INGUMBFTSC1.DTL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MelissaB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. More:
For years, researchers with the Cal Tech/MIT Voting Technology Project have studied what happens to votes that seemingly disappear. They've found vast differences among different techniques of voting. They have concluded, for example, that punch cards produced uncounted presidential votes nearly twice as often as alternatives such as optically scanned paper ballots and ATM- like electronic machines. They've also noted that some of those uncounted votes can be attributed to voters who deliberately opted not to vote for any candidate for president.

In an analysis released earlier this month, these researchers concluded that the presidential election of 2004, in which 1 in 91 votes didn't count, was run "much better" than the 2000 election, in which 1 in 53 ballots didn't count

>>>snip

Even though the 2004 presidential contest was not as close as 2000, skeptics were able to cite instances of voting irregularities and ask the ominous "What if?" More than 70 percent of voters in Ohio used the same punch- card system that wreaked such havoc in Florida in 2000.

>>>snip

But a headlong rush toward electronic machines hit the skids after computer experts raised faith-shaking concerns that systems without paper trails could be corrupted by a dishonest election official or even an outside hacker.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MelissaB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
7. CounterBias: The New Boxer Rebellion

The New Boxer Rebellion

Democrats, Take A Lesson From Barbara Boxer and Howard Dean


February 27 2005
Counterbias.com
by W. David Jenkins III


I have to say that I have never, ever, lost respect for the truth in the service of anything. I really hope that you will refrain from impugning my integrity. Condoleezza Rice to U.S. Senator Barbara Boxer, January 18, 2005.

I have to admit, the first thing out of my mouth when I heard the good doctor utter this amazing response was, What on Earth are you talking about? What integrity? Heres the original Miss Mushroom Cloud getting miffed because some woman from California was calling her out for lying to everybody in the nation and not taking responsibility for her statements or their consequences.

And thats just concerning Iraq. We wont even go into her irresponsible behavior pre-9/11, as recent reports have shed light on her flirtatious relationship with the truth in regards to her testimony on that matter last year.

Barbara Boxer was called mean-spirited among other things by the opposition as well as the lazy, allegedly liberal media after Rices confirmation hearings. Conservatives moaned and whined that Boxer was being partisan and was trying to tarnish the image of such a fine upstanding American such as Dr. Rice. Once again, the Democrats were being blamed for feeding the atmosphere of bitter divisiveness that grips the inner sanctums of the Capitol. These pompous fat little Republican kings, who control all three branches of government, still play the victim card as they always do when they feel threatened.

Much more: http://www.counterbias.com/233.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MelissaB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
8. Democrats learn to frame debate

Democrats learn to frame debate



By Jeni Lewis
Central Wisconsin Sunday

MARSHFIELD - Across the nation, Democrats want voters to understand their side of issues.

So, they're working to change their language.

"If we're going to change the message, we need to have consistency from amongst the people," said Linda Melski of Marshfield, who organized a grass-roots meeting Saturday at Wildwood Station in Marshfield. "It's one of those issues changing the style in which you present an issue. Changing your language structure takes time and practice."
Groups are being organized across the nation as part of Democracy for America, a political action committee inspired by Howard Dean's 2004 campaign for president. Several meetings have taken place in Stevens Point and Marshfield, and organizers hope they will grow in size and popularity.

George Lakoff, a University of California-Berkeley professor of linguistics and cognitive science, has a video and book that address how to win elections by changing the message.

"One of the problems progressives have is, they are divided, and we must unify," Lakoff said on the video, "How Democrats and Progressives Can Win."
Democracy for America chapters are using his four rules of engagement to restructure their responses on local, state and national issues. Those rules are: Show respect; reframe the issue in context of progressive values; think and talk at the level of those values; and say what you believe.

Lakoff calls it framing the message.


More: http://www.wisinfo.com/newsherald/mnhlocal/298343726644282.shtml

Thanks to ProudToBeLiberal here: http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=102x1269340
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MelissaB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 11:26 AM
Response to Original message
9. NPR Poll: Dems Have Early Edge for '06 Elections

NPR Poll: Dems Have Early Edge for '06 Elections

February 26, 2005

NPR Poll: Dems Have Early Edge for '06 Elections
A newly-released poll for National Public Radio gives Democratic congressional candidates an early lead in the 2006 congressional campaign. The poll, conducted by Public Opinion Strategies and Greenberg Quinlan Rosner Research 2/15-17 indicated that 42 percent of repondents would vote for the Democratic candidate and 36 percent would vote for the Republican candidate in their district, "if the election for Congress were held today."

The 6 point Democratic advantage was in line with a GQRR poll conducted in January that gave the Dems a 5 point advantage in '06. A December Ipsos-Public Affairs poll gave the Dems a 7 point advantage in response to the question "And if the election for congress were held today, would you want to see the Republicans or Democrats win control of Congress?"

Posted by EDM Staff at 08:48 PM | link
Ruy Teixeira is a Senior Fellow at The Century Foundation and
the Center for American Progress


Link:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dzika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 02:48 PM
Response to Original message
10. Videos from this weekend - 2/26 through 2/27

Fox News Watch on "GannonGate" - 2/26



Watch the video (6 minutes)




SNL: Bush twins after inauguration - 2/26 (re-run)



Watch the video (5 minutes)




SNL: Boxer, Kerry question Condi - 2/26 (re-run)



Watch the video (5 minutes)




SNL: Weekend Update with inauguration - 2/26 (re-run)



Watch the video (5 minutes)




Fox Sunday Morning: Dean tours Red States - 2/27



Watch the video (1 minute)




ABC This Week: Schwarzenegger Interview - 2/27



Watch the video (9 minutes)




ABC This Week: Bush is questioned about firing reporters - 2/27



Watch the video (2 minutes)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gelliebeans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 01:10 AM
Response to Reply #10
20. I just wanted to say thanks
for posting all of these video snippets for us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dzika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
11. VRs Divestiture for Democracy campaign BEGINS!!!

VRs Divestiture for Democracy campaign BEGINS!!!





Dear Supporter -

As we've been teasing for some time, our first massive mobilization effort for Electoral Reform -- VR's "Divestiture for Democracy" campaign -- is now officially underway!





On February 21st (President's Day) VR sent a letter to all nine of the major American Voting Machine companies asking them to do the right thing for our country by publicly announcing -- immediately -- their commitment to include voter-verified paper-ballots with every vote cast on their machines, to open their hardware and secret software for inspection by non-partisan individuals, and a number of other important actions which we feel will begin to help restore confidence in our electoral system.

We have asked these companies to publicly commit to these important changes within 60 days, or VR and our Affiliates and all of our collective members will fight back with one of the few weapons we have left - our pocketbooks!

If they do so, we will broadly recognize their efforts. If, however, these companies, who now privately run the most important public element of democracy -- the way that votes are counted -- choose against doing the right and patriotic thing for our country, we will have no choice but to call on all of our members and affiliates to launch a massive campaign of divestiture and boycott of these companies and their clients.

As well, we will begin a public education campaign via ad buys in the media to help highlight the evil that we feel these companies represent by keeping the way that votes are counted a shameful secret in America.

Full information about this exciting new campaign (of the people, by the people and for the people!) including the letter which VR sent last week to the Voting Machine companies is available at:

http://www.VelvetRevolution.us/Campaigns/DV4D

But now we need YOU!



...Please stop by the above link as soon as you can, and click the link to "SEND AN EMAIL TO THE COMPANIES!" so the voices of American voters will finally be heard LOUD and CLEAR! Let them hear from you!

We will begin our full PR blitz to get the word out about this campaign on Monday but wanted to give VR Members a heads up! So, let's start making some noise!

Please...Sign the letter (it takes less than a minute!) forward this email, and let's begin taking our democracy back...NOW!

And so begins the revolution!

Brad Friedman
Co-Founder, VELVET REVOLUTION
http://www.VelvetRevolution.us
For more info on VR's Divestiture for Democracy campaign,
Contact: DV4D@VelvetRevolution.us






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dzika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
12. No More Whining, Jimmy-Jeff!

February 27 2005

No More Whining, Jimmy-Jeff!]

James "Jimmy" Guckert, or Jeff Gannon, has had his fifteen minuteshere's a few more seconds!

Doug Griffin
T E X A N F O R T R U T H



James D. Guckert, or Jeff Gannon (hereafter referred to as Jimmy-Jeff), you have only yourself to blame. Same goes for Republicans crying foul at Jimmy-Jeffs outing by activist John Aravosis of Americablog.org and the Kossacks at DailyKos.com as well as others from Left, Blogsylvania. And now to add more gasoline to the flame (pun intended), Jimmy-Jeff is threatening litigation against said bloggers for among other things, political assassination.

Im shocked, Jimmy-Jeff, completely dumbfounded by your audacity. First of all, I wasnt aware that you were a politician which is sort of a pre-requisite for someone to politically assassinate someone else. Remember, Jimmy-Jeff, you are/were a male prostitute neither a politician nor a reporter/journalist, although nowadays its tough to know the players without a program. You are/were the top that doesnt/didnt leave marks, just impressions. Remember? Second of all, youre a Bush insider. Boy, if that phrase doesnt have a new meaning! You should be the last person to threaten a frivolous lawsuit given the Administrations stand on tort reform and all. But then again, this is the most hypocritical of administrations.

...

The lapdogs in the White House Press Corp behave like my own dogs waiting for treat when it comes to the Bush Administration. They pant and wag their tails, gleefully awaiting a little morsel of Bush Administration BS. They are complicit even when Bush spits in their collective faces by planting Jimmy-Jeff amongst them and giving him exclusives they could only dream of getting.

We do owe the White House Press Corp and the mainstream media a bit of an apology, though. Jimmy-Jeff isnt the only whore in question, but he is getting all the attention. Sorry, Mainstream Media. In my opinion, most of them are whores who sold themselves and the American public out by their complicity and complacency towards the Bush Administration. Not asking the tough questions is just as reprehensible as Jimmy-Jeffs softball questions.



more: http://www.counterbias.com/237.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dzika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 03:29 PM
Response to Original message
13. Nonprofit groups fight campaign finance proposal

02-25-05

Nonprofit groups fight campaign finance proposal

By SHARON THEIMER
Associated Press Writer


WASHINGTON (AP) -- Nonprofit groups including the Sierra Club and League of Conservation Voters are opposing legislation that would place new restrictions on partisan interest groups that spend in congressional or presidential elections.

Acting as an alliance called the Coalition to Protect Independent Political Speech, the half-dozen groups sent an e-mail Friday urging other nonprofits to join them in writing letters to Congress against the proposal.

"It goes too far to root out a few problem groups," the alliance wrote. In addition to the Sierra Club and the League of Conservation Voters, the coalition includes NARAL Pro-Choice America; OMB Watch, which bills itself as a watchdog group seeking greater government openness; and the liberal Alliance for Justice, which keeps an eye on judicial nominees, and People for the American Way.

The legislation, sponsored by Sens. John McCain, R-Ariz., and Russ Feingold, D-Wis., and Reps. Christopher Shays, R-Conn., and Marty Meehan, D-Mass., would place tax-exempt partisan groups known as 527s under the same strict fund-raising and spending limits that apply to political action committees.

The measure would bar 527s active in federal elections from spending unlimited donations from individuals, corporations and unions like the six- and seven-figure checks that groups supporting or opposing President Bush or Democrat John Kerry poured into last year's presidential race.


more: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A56966-2005Feb27.html


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dzika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 03:32 PM
Response to Original message
14. For a better Florida Build on election successes

Published February 27, 2005

For a better Florida Build on election successes

A Times Editorial


Despite the dire predictions and political gamesmanship, Florida performed pretty well in the 2004 election. We coped with early voting, new machines and unprecedented scrutiny. An independent poll shows more than eight of every 10 voters rate the elections as good or excellent. The decrease in the percentage of ballots that were spoiled or unmarked compared to the problem-plagued 2000 election ranks among the best in the nation.

That perspective is important to keep in mind this spring as the Legislature debates further changes to the election system. While there are issues to address, Florida is much better off than it was four years ago. There is no need for radical change. The system needs to be tweaked, not blown up again.

The debate started badly when Secretary of State Glenda Hood blindsided county elections supervisors with an ill-advised power grab. There should be some strong statewide standards in areas such as poll worker training, early voting, voter registration and the handling of provisional ballots. But elected county elections supervisors should not be forced to cede all power to an appointed secretary of state whose decisions appear tainted by political partisanship. Lawmakers should reject Hood's pitch for the authority to fine and criminally charge elections supervisors who don't follow the rules. She is the one who deserved sanctions for her mishandling of the flawed felon voter lists and her hyper-enforcement of election rules that would have resulted in unfairly disenfranchising voters.

One of the most meaningful election reforms would be to allow all felons to vote after they have completed their sentences. While Gov. Jeb Bush and the Cabinet made it easier for felons to have their civil rights restored, they did not go far enough.


more: http://www.sptimes.com/2005/02/27/Opinion/Build_on_election_suc.shtml
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dzika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
15. White House Lies: A History

Feb. 27, 2005

White House Lies: A History



What is worrisome is the
effect that one lie can have
on the entire executive branch



...
Alterman concludes the book with a chapter on George W. Bush and the "post-truth presidency," an apt assessment of where we have come to. Seeing as Alterman began the book many years ago as a graduate dissertation, it is not too surprising that Bushs presidency provides only a brief coda. But Bushs relationship to the truth and its consequences for our politics are worthy of lengthier contemplation.

Two things distinguish Bush from his predecessors on the subject of lying. First, Bushs grandest lies have not been about covering up what has already happened but about persuading the public to go along with what he has decided to do but has yet to implement. Tax cuts, Iraq, now Social Security -- each major policy move has been accompanied by a campaign of deception. Lying is not a defensive reaction to a crisis but a carefully crafted strategy. Second, and perhaps most troubling, is that Bush seems unconcerned about getting caught. Indeed, the administrations damn-the-torpedoes fearlessness is the source of much of its political success. That it would actually hire, along with a series of other Iran-Contra figures, a perjurer like Elliot Abrams -- who has recently been promoted to deputy national-security adviser in charge of democracy promotion, of all things -- is testimony to its utter audacity. Go ahead, these officials seem to be saying, call us a bunch of liars -- we really dont care.

One of the common threads running through this history is that in case after case, the press went along with whatever the administration told it. Watergate may have temporarily cured reporters of this credulousness, but the remission lasted only so long. When the history of the Bush administration is written, the abject cowardice of the press in confronting an administration that held it in undisguised contempt and lied in its face will be one of the most depressing chapters. As citizens, we have no defense from official deception but the reporters who are tasked with discovering the truth and holding presidents to account on our behalf. As Alterman writes, if public officials "feel free to lie to the press -- and, by extension, the nation -- with impunity, then democracy becomes pseudo-democracy, as the illusion of accountability replaces the real thing." Even when they have mustered the courage to point out fabrications in a story buried on page A19, the medias mighty arrows of truth telling have bounced off this White House like a childs toy with defective suction cups.

"In each case," Alterman says about Roosevelt, Kennedy, Johnson, and Reagan, "the president or his party was made to pay for his deceptions along with the country they so cavalierly misled." As of yet, not only has neither Bush nor his party paid a price for the lies about Iraq but there is little reason to think they will anytime soon. In no small part, the administration is able to evade consequence for its mendacity because its supporters have adopted a siege mentality, hunkered behind the castle walls of their loyalty to the president. Presented with irrefutable evidence that the war in Iraq was sold on a series of deceptions, many of them simply stick their fingers in their ears and chant, "La la la, I cant hear you."


more: http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2005/02/25/opinion/main676613.shtml
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dzika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
16. Putin to Bush: 'We Didn't Criticize You When You Fired Those Reporters at

Sunday February 27, 12:34 pm ET

NEWSWEEK: Putin to Bush:
'We Didn't Criticize You When You Fired Those Reporters at CBS'


Press Release
Source: Newsweek


NEWSWEEK: Putin to Bush: 'We Didn't Criticize You When You Fired Those Reporters at CBS'
Sunday February 27, 12:34 pm ET


NEW YORK, Feb. 27 /PRNewswire/ -- When George W. Bush confronted Vladimir Putin last week about the freedom of the press in Russia, Senior White House Correspondent Richard Wolffe reports, Putin shot back with an attack of his own: "We didn't criticize you when you fired those reporters at CBS." Details of the meeting, which included just the two presidents and their translators inside the historic castle that overlooks the Slovak capital of Bratislava, are reported in the March 7 issue of Newsweek (on newsstands Monday, February 28).
(Photo: http://www.newscom.com/cgi-bin/prnh/20050227/NYSU002 )

It's not clear how well Putin understands the controversy that led to the dismissal of four CBS journalists over the discredited report on Bush's National Guard service. Yet it's all too clear how Putin sees the relationship between Bush and the American media -- just like his own. Bush's aides have long feared that former KGB officers in Putin's inner circle are painting a twisted picture of U.S. policy. So Bush explained how he had no power to fire American journalists. It made little difference, Wolffe writes.

When the two presidents emerged for their joint press conference, one Russian reporter repeated Putin's language about journalists getting fired. Bush (already hot after an earlier question about his spying on U.S. citizens) asked the reporter if he felt free. "They obviously planted the question," said one of Bush's senior aides.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/7037620/site/newsweek/

(Read Newsweek's news releases at http://www.Newsweek.com.
Click "Pressroom.")



source: http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/050227/nysu017_1.html




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MelissaB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 05:32 PM
Response to Original message
17. Democratic National Committee, Pelosi weigh in on Gannon scandal, credenti
Edited on Sun Feb-27-05 05:36 PM by MelissaB

Democratic National Committee, Pelosi weigh in on Gannon scandal, credentialing


2/27/2005
Democratic National Committee, Pelosi weigh in on Gannon scandal, credentialing

Democratic National Committee, Pelosi enter Gannon fray

By John Byrne | RAW STORY Editor

Saying the Democratic National Committee had not weighed in on the scandal surrounding discredited White House reporter Jeff Gannon because the Committee was in transition, the DNCs national spokesman broke the ice in a conversation with RAW STORY.

The office of House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), who has been silent on the issue to date, also voiced their concerns.

Both the DNC and Pelosis office shared similar alarm over what they perceive as media manipulation. Each offered a more temperate critique than the spokeswomen for Sen. Ted Kennedy (D-MA) and Sen. John Kerry (D-MA) voiced earlier this week.

The DNCs national spokesman, Jano Cabrera, said the Committee had particular concern with what they see as a deliberate strategy by the Bush Administration to manipulate the media. The office of DNC Chairman Howard Dean did not return a call for comment placed Friday.

More: http://rawstory.com/news/2005/index.php?p=132

Edited to add:
discussion here: http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=104x3190434
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dzika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 08:59 PM
Response to Original message
18. U.S. to beam Arabic-language channel to Europe

Sunday, February 27, 2005

U.S. to beam Arabic-language channel to Europe

Government-funded Alhurra is meant to compete with Al-Jazeera



WASHINGTON (CNN) -- The Bush administration is planning to expand the reach of its Arabic-language satellite channel, Alhurra, into Europe, an official overseeing the network said Sunday.
...
Officials said Alhurra is intended to provide competition to the Arabic-language channel Al-Jazeera, which they contend is biased against the United States.
...

Just before the channel's launch last February, Bush said, "We are telling the people in the Middle East the truth about the values and the policies of the United States, and the truth always serves the cause of freedom."
...

Meanwhile, the U.S. Department of Defense also plans to add more sites on the Internet to provide information to a global audience. (Full story)

But some senior military officers told CNN the Web sites may clash with Bush's recent statements.

"We will not be paying commentators to advance our agenda," Bush told reporters January 26. "Our agenda ought to be able to stand on its own two feet."
(Full story)

Bush made those comments after it came to light that the administration had paid several commentators to support U.S. policies in the U.S. media.


source: http://www.cnn.com/2005/US/02/27/alhurra.expansion/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dzika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 12:29 AM
Response to Original message
19. Concerns abound over voting machines in Arkansas

Sunday, February 27, 2005

Concerns abound over voting machines in Arkansas

By Tracy M. Neal Staff Writer



BENTONVILLE Voting machines were the focus Saturday of two speakers addressing the Benton County Democratic Women.

By Jan. 6, 2006, all counties in Arkansas must have direct recorded electronic (touchtone) or optical scan machines, Benton County Election Coordinator Jim McCarthy told the group. The machines must be in place for any federal election, Ecker said.

...
Ecker said he believes the machines needed to be in place as soon as possible, so he could begin training his 535 poll workers on the new technology. "Some people cant program a VCR, and we are going to ask them to program these machines," Ecker said.

..
Lisa Burks with the National Coalition for Verified Voting also spoke to the group about the new machines. Her address focused on the importance of voters having a paper receipt after they cast their votes.

Burks, of Conway, Ark., said it was not a Democratic or Republican issue because both parties had lost votes in elections across the country. "We need something more secure for our vote," Burks said. "Nothing is more important than casting, counting and recounting our votes."

...
She urged the audience to contact their local representatives to tell them the importance of having paper receipts and to ask them to require all counties to have receipts. Voters do not leave polling places with the receipts, but they are placed in lock boxes in case a recount is necessary, Burks said. "All we are asking for is paper machines and paper receipts to make sure our vote is counted," she said.


source: http://nwanews.com/story.php?paper=bcdrion=News&storyid=17793
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 04:33 AM
Response to Reply #19
21. Link to the above article
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 10:38 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC