Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Georgia activists rock (& educate): Paper trail for voting not a cure

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
MelissaB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-13-05 10:29 AM
Original message
Georgia activists rock (& educate): Paper trail for voting not a cure
Edited on Fri Mar-18-05 11:58 AM by Skinner

Paper trail for voting not a cure


Editorial

Georgians may be getting something more than an "I'm A Georgia Voter" sticker when they walk away from their voting machines, if proposed legislation making its way through the General Assembly earns approval of the state's lawmakers.

Sen. Vincent Fort, D-Atlanta, and Rep. Tim Bearden, R-Villa Rica, have introduced bills in their respective chambers that would require outfitting the state's 24,000 electronic voting machines with equipment that would produce a voter-verified paper audit trail. What that would do is provide voters with a printer-generated copy of the selections they made on the machine's touch screen. Voters wouldn't be allowed to take the paper verification of their ballot choices with them; it would drop into a locked box.

For some of the state's citizens, who clearly don't believe the electronic voting machines are accurately counting their votes, the move to establish a paper audit trail likely will come as welcome news.

>>>snip

The perception of inaccurate counting also makes it incumbent on Secretary of State Cathy Cox, who turned back a similar legislative effort last year, to move away from outright rejection of a paper trail, particularly in light of the fact that persistent concerns remain about whether electronic election systems are tamper-proof. Earlier this year, the nonpartisan, nonprofit group Black Box Voting demonstrated its ability to hack into one such system.

EDITED BY ADMIN: COPYRIGHT


More: http://onlineathens.com/stories/031305/opi_20050313034.shtml

You have to regrister to read this one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
berniew1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-13-05 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
1. Georgia had touch screen switching and other problems in 2004 & 2000
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-13-05 04:15 PM
Response to Original message
2. .
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stevepol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-14-05 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
3. Don't forget 2002, the most egregious example of fraud in history n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cookie wookie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-14-05 06:45 PM
Response to Original message
4. The Vote Count Protection Act
nonpartisan legislation drafted by the Georgia Voter Choice Coalition, mandates the provision of voter-verified paper ballots for Georgia’s paperless Diebold Election System.

Citizen concerns about paperless voting have mounted since the installation of the Diebold Election System in Georgia in 2002. Their concerns have been heightened by recent studies, such as the one issued in September 2004 by the Free Congress Foundation, who warned that Georgia has one of worst voting system implementations in the nation. The foundation issued a report grading Georgia’s system an F- on a national average of C+.
http://www.voterchoice.org/library/fminus.htm


Electronic voting machines can be accidentally or intentionally programmed in a variety of ways to record and count the vote differently from what the voter intends. Additional problems arise in paperless implementations, because there is no mechanism to conduct a recount independently of the election tally that is computed by the system’s software.


“These major flaws will be rectified with the passage of this legislation. In providing for voter-verified paper ballots that will be counted at the precinct level, voters gain an auditing mechanism to compare to the electronic tally,” said Anne Merkl, chair of the Voter Choice Coalition. “We believe very strongly that securing the integrity of our elections should be at the top of the 2005 legislative agenda.”

For background information and to review the proposed legislation, go to: http://www.voterchoice.org. Scroll down to mid-page, left column for copies of the legislation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moderator DU Moderator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-18-05 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
5. MelissaB
Per DU copyright rules
please post only four
paragraphs from the
copyrighted news source.


Thank you.


DU Moderator
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 01:32 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC