Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ohio Democratic Party vs. Blackwell: Update

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-05 03:49 PM
Original message
Ohio Democratic Party vs. Blackwell: Update
I wrote to the Ohio Democratic Party trying to find out why they moved to dismiss the case.

A reply arrived this morning.

It said that the sole objective of the suit, which was achieved, was to get a TRO (Temporary Restraining Order?) to aid voters in the two involved counties.


Here's some background:

State Wants Judge To Rule On Its Role In Election
Long Voting Lines Spurred Request
by AP/Ohio.com

March 2, 2005

COLUMBUS, Ohio -- The state has asked a federal judge to determine whether it complied with the law in how it conducted last year's presidential election, saying it needs a precedent for challenges in future elections.

-snip-

The request grew out of a case originally brought by the Ohio Democratic Party against Secretary of State Kenneth Blackwell, a Republican, and two county boards of election on Election Day. The party sought to alleviate long lines at polling places in two counties.

-snip-

After Kerry conceded, the Democrats asked Marbley to dismiss the case. However, the Ohio Attorney General's office, representing Blackwell, is trying to keep it alive so Marbley will rule on its request. The state filed a motion to intervene, asking Marbley to rule that the state and county boards did not violate constitutional guarantees of the right to vote, as claimed by the Democrats.

-snip-

The state countered that Marbley should rule so a judgment will be in place if similar court actions are filed in future elections.

-snip/more-

http://www.ohio.com/mld/beaconjournal/11033738.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-05 10:56 PM
Response to Original message
1. This seemed important the other day
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Melissa G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-05 11:03 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. thanks for the research! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
garybeck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-05 02:48 AM
Response to Original message
3. thanks for that!!
Unfortunately the beaconjournal is a subscription only site... Do you know what the TRO was for, and did they get it?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-05 02:53 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. This is the third link I've had to dig up for this story!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
garybeck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-05 03:50 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. thanks!
:yourock:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-05 04:05 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. TRO
My guess is the TRO related to the following:

-snip-

The request grew out of a case originally brought by the Ohio Democratic Party against Secretary of State Kenneth Blackwell, a Republican, and two county boards of election on Election Day. The party sought to alleviate long lines at polling places in two counties.

U.S. District Judge Algenon Marbley ordered Blackwell's office and the Knox and Franklin county boards of election to provide alternative methods of voting. The polls remained open past their 7:30 p.m. closing time to accommodate anyone who was in line at that time. Some voters waited in line more than seven hours and the last ballots were cast early on Nov. 3.

-snip-

Seem right. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-05 04:13 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. But dig this...
Edited on Tue Mar-22-05 04:14 AM by Wilms
January 18, 2005

Fairness by Beckerman

Alliance for Democracy Seeks to Intervene Before Democratic Party Dismisses Its Own Case in Knox & Franklin Counties

-snip-

The Ohio Democratic Party appears, by its motion to dismiss its claims against the Franklin County Board of Elections, to have lost interest in further pursuit of this complaint. Intervenor Ohio Republican Party and defendant Blackwell appear to be seeking to nullify the importance of this court’s injunction as an important precedent for protecting voting rights and according equal protection of law for all Ohio citizens. Thus, there is no other party in this action that appears willing to aggressively represent the interest of the Alliance in protecting the democratic values at issue in this preceding."

-snip/more-

http://fairnessbybeckerman.blogspot.com/2005/01/alliance-for-democracy-seeks-to.html

And more here ("find" keyword: knox)

http://fairnessbybeckerman.blogspot.com/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mojorabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-05 10:18 PM
Response to Original message
8. Could someone summerize this for me?
Is this the last case re the election that is before the courts? Why would it be dropped? Is this the one Kerry was backing? I have the flu and am a bit loopy.
Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 10:05 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC