|
...leaders, national and local. Lifelong loyal Democratic voter here, lo these forty-some years (first political campaign--JFK, 1960). So I'm not trashing Democrats idly--or from the outside, as a Green or an independent. But I am also well informed about politics, history and the current global corporate scene, and I'm not naive. I know that the job losses of the 2000's, for instance, are directly due to Clinton-Gore policy. They are the ones who signed NAFTA, etc.--in a huge betrayal of the electorate, to whom they promised labor and environmental protections on global trade agreements. That's what the Seattle 1999 protests were about--they were largely a protest against Clinton, and the repression against the protesters--essentially a police riot--was perpetrated by Democratic politicians in Washington state in defense of Clinton and of the piratical, robber baron policies of the World Trade Organization.
I nevertheless voted for Clinton in 2000, thinking of those small sops to the poor--like the minimum wage--which the Democrats still seemed to be defending. Little as it is, these tiny increments, like 25 cents an hour in wage increases, mean a lot when you have nothing. And, of course, the Democrats have been a bulwark on social progress.
However, on the matter of our fraudulent election system, I have been very shocked at the Democrats' behavior. They should have been screaming bloody murder long before the election, on major donors to Bush counting all our votes in secret, with no paper trail. I mean, really. It doesn't take a rocket scientist...
And where were they on Nov. 2? And where are they now?
Well, in California, it was the DEMOCRATS who did Arnold Schwarzenegger's dirty work for him, and drove our good Secretary of State Kevin Shelley out of office with a vile smear campaign. Democrats. Now we have a Schwarzenegger patsy appointee as Sec of State. (For those who don't know, Shelley was the best Sec of State in the country on electronic voting; decertified and sued Diebold, and provided Californians with a paper ballot option for 2004, among other things.)
The electronic voting scene is a stewpot of corruption, involving both parties. I'm sure that was Tom Delay's intention in passing HAVA. HAVA succeeded in destroying our election system, by bribing the states with $4 billion to convert to insecure, unreliable, hackable electronic voting systems run on secret, proprietary programs, owned and controlled by major Republican donors. It is the worse thing that has ever happened in this country, exept maybe slavery. It IS slavery.
So you have to wonder (and be a bit mind-boggled) about the level of collusion and corruption we are dealing with. You look at this election thing, and the first thing you think is, are the Demcrats suicidal or what? What is going on here? And I'm afraid that the preponderance of the evidence points to Democrats ALSO being fascists but being a lot more sneaky about it than Bush.
Let me back off on that just a little. I think some Democratic office holders are just plain scared of the Bush Cartel. I know it can't be easy being in their direct line of fire. They are murderous, thieving, vicious bastards, who will stop at nothing to stay in power. And the better Democrats may simply be daunted by the kind of power the Bush Cartel has--over the news monopolies, for instance, and now, over the entire U.S. intelligence apparatus.
But I no longer think--on the election issue--that the problem with the Democrats is ignorance (that electronic voting run by Wally O'Dell is just too esoteric to understand). There is no more important matter for politicians and political consultants than how votes are counted. That's their JOB, for chrissakes! Getting votes. So I don't buy the line that they need to be "educated." Something else is going on. And I think it is a very complex situation--not easy to read.
Part of it is their just being stunned and hamstrung by the Bush Cartel's naked and covert power. Part of it is just plain corruption--every officie holder a millionaire, every millionaire benefitting from tax cuts for the rich; plus having their hands in the military-industrial complex. And part of it is that many Dem leaders support war in the Middle East, and like having Bush do it for them. And Bush makes them look good. They can spend their time DEFENDING Social Security--DEFENDING IT!--and NOT demanding reform of our medical system and riding herd on drug companies and medical insurance pirates. Bush pulls the argument so far over to the right--in fact right of the cliff of fascism--that the Democrats don't have to do anything to look good. They can just stand there--well fed themselves, smug, living in a bubble of privilege--and do nothing. AND they can fall back on the excuse of being the "minority" party, even if they very clearly are not. (Bush does not represent the majority of Americans and everybody knows it--look at the opinion polls!)
But I am far from feeling despair. I think it's really important that we, the people, are finding these things out. What we do with the information that the election was stolen and the Democrats don't seem to give a damn is up to our collective wisdom and energy.
The foundation of our action, as a people, needs to be a clear-eyed understanding of the situation we are--not naivete, not hoping for the Democrats to suddenly turn into "White Knights" who will rescue our democracy. Ain't gonna happen. But some of them might help--and might very much want to help--as the rest of us, the vast majority of people in this country, figure out how to get our country back.
|