Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

BRAD BLOG: Conyers at Media Bias Forum: 'Independent Press Under Assault'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
kster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-24-05 07:24 PM
Original message
BRAD BLOG: Conyers at Media Bias Forum: 'Independent Press Under Assault'
Conyers at Media Bias Forum: 'Independent Press Under Assault'
Says Mainstream Media Unwilling to Accurately Report on Admin, Scapegoated, Facing Retribution if They Do

Opening Statement cites alt media sources BRAD BLOG, DailyKos, RAW STORY & Air America in 'forefront' of those 'willing to be speak truth to power'.

Details and Complete Opening Statement:
http://www.bradblog.com/archives/00001414.htm

---
Brad Friedman
THE BRAD BLOG - The uprising continues...
http://www.BradBlog.com
VELVET REVOLUTION - The revolution begins...
http://www.VelvetRevolution.us

*** The BRAD SHOW On the Air via RAW RADIO!
*** http://www.BradShow.com
*** Now LIVE on Saturday Nights from 7p - 11p ET!
*** Broadcast coast-to-coast and around the globe
*** via the IBC Satellite Radio Network! Listen Online!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-24-05 07:42 PM
Response to Original message
1. You know, I hope that some of the peons in the "media"
are sitting there with tape recorders and documenting all the harassment/threats they are getting . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tommcintyre Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-24-05 08:16 PM
Response to Original message
2. Conyers is going to be remembered in history as the one who stood up and..
said no the the tyranny!

A true American hero!
:patriot:

Thanks for the report kster.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
autorank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-25-05 01:15 AM
Response to Original message
3. Conyers is in the House!
Kster, great post. I think Conyers is one of our last hopes. I'm so grateful to him for fighting on. He could retire comfortably and we'd be without a fine man and leader. But then again, he probably knows what happens when people with a cause/talent, etc. retire...it's called the happy hunting grounds.

:yourock:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-25-05 06:23 AM
Response to Original message
4. "...our ongoing national election scandal." --John Conyers
John Conyers praises Bradblog, Raw Story and Air America for their coverage of "our ongoing national election scandal" in his opening statement for his forum on "Media Bias and Freedom of the Press" yesterday (5/24/05). See paragraph 4. He says he himself learned of the Bush/Blair "smoking gun" Iraq memo (the Downing Street memo) at Daily Kos (making the point that the news monopolies buried it). Although he doesn't credit DU (boo-hoo) on election fraud (and I also wish he had mentioned FreePress.org), I am profoundly impressed with the man's grasp of the two essentials of freedom--transparent elections and a free press--and how imperiled they both are right now.

His analysis deserves widespread quotation and praise. Here are some key paragraphs:

-----

"In the lead up to the Iraq war, every minor leak supporting the Administration's contention that Iraq possessed weapons of mass destruction was trumpeted on page one. Stories challenging these assertions and discussing the final reports of weapons inspectors concluding there were no such weapons, however, were banished to a few paragraphs in the middle of dailies. Such incidents have become the rule, not the exception, during the Bush Administration, particularly after 9/11 and in the face of a massive consolidation in media ownership.

"Can you imagine the media uproar ten years ago if the Clinton White House had given a fake journalist operating under a fake name unlimited access to the White House? Does anyone think for a minute that the Washington Times would have ignored stories about paid propaganda coming out of the Clinton Education Department, or if a Democratic Secretary of State had turned tens of thousands of Republicans away at the polls in a critical swing state?

"Would most of the major papers have buried stories detailing secret agreements to invade Iraq, billions of dollars in missing reconstruction funds, or fantasy war stories spun by the Defense Department if a Democrat were responsible? Consider what Bob Novak or Bill O'Reilly would have said if Mike McCurry had browbeaten them about their use of anonymous sources, or the Secretary of Defense had warned the press to 'be careful what you say' as Donald Rumsfeld had done. You know the answer as well as I do.

"There are a few alternative sources willing to speak truth to power. I first learned about the now infamous Downing Street Memo on Daily Kos. Bradblog, Raw Story and Air America have been at the forefront of our ongoing national election scandal. But these voices are too few and too diffuse to overcome the blatant biases of our cable channels and the negligence and neglect of our major newspapers.

"Thomas Jefferson wrote 'our liberty depends on the freedom of the press, and that cannot be limited without being lost.' Let me remind those in the media, by failing to exercise your rights and duties to challenge authority, you risk losing not only your integrity, but the nation's trust and respect...."

http://www.bradblog.com/archives/00001414.htm

------

Note: Conyers uses the phrase "mainstream media." We've got to change this description of Bush's lapdogs. No way are these news monopolies representative of the majority of Americans, or of mainstream American opinion! They are way over to the right of the American people and are NOT MAINSTREAM. Look at the polls! Nearly 60% of Americans oppose the Iraq war, now, today--as they did prior to the invasion. Over 63% of Americans oppose the torture of prisoners UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES. Bush's approval ratings are dismal and unprecedented for a recently 're-elected' 2nd term president (48% on election day, 49% on the day of this 'inauguration,' 42% today!). Americans oppose every major Bush policy, foreign and domestic, in huge numbers--up in the 60% to 70% range. Do we see this reflected in the news monopolies? No, we do not. (This is also supporting evidence of election fraud.)

So, "news monopolies," for short. "The Bush Oil Cartel's lapdog news monopolies," if you want to be really accurate. Spread the word. Nix "mainstream" media.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-25-05 06:56 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. P.S. What an irony that Conyers uses 'MSM' talking about MEDIA BIAS!
He says they're way off base--in essence, a tool of the right--but calls them MAINSTREAM. Not his fault. Just a symptom of the general problem with this phrase ("mainstream media"). It really, really needs changing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-25-05 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. "Girlyman media"
comes to mind,if they won't speak truth to power for us,or for themselves they should at least do it to protect their family,if they don't the only name I can think of for them is Girlyman media.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 08:48 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC