Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Anyone Familiar With This Open-Source Voting System In Australia?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
Syrinx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-05 09:44 PM
Original message
Anyone Familiar With This Open-Source Voting System In Australia?
I was just browsing through some old magazines, and came across this in the January 2004 issue of Dr. Dobb's Journal. While I'm partial to pen and paper myself, the approach taken in Australia seems quite sane compared to what's been going on here in the states.

*snip*

So what the government did was to put out a call for proposals to fix the system. Of the proposals that came in, exactly one was an open-source plan. Phillip Green, the electoral commissioner for the territory involved, said it was an easy choice to go with the open-source plan. He'd been observing the American experiments with e-voting, you see, and he had a good idea of what to avoid. "We were wary of using proprietary software that no one was allowed to see," he said. "We were very keen for the whole process to be transparent so that everyone—particularly the political parties and the candidates, but also the world at large—could be satisfied that the software was actually doing what it was meant to be doing." Thus: open source.

Despite the obvious good sense of Green's choice, the government went ahead with it. From start to finish, the project was posted on the Web for all to see. Also, an independent verification and validation company was hired to audit every line of code. Mistakes got spotted and corrected. And the whole project, from concept to product, took just six months and cost $125,000.

The eVACS system is not terribly sophisticated. Voters get a bar code to swipe over a reader, and that lets them cast a vote. It doesn't record any personal info; the validation that the voter is the voter happens in the usual low-tech way prior to handing out the vote-enabling bar code, I guess. The voter then uses an on-screen ballot, and the results are sent securely to a local server that burns two identical discs of results, along with digital signatures. These get delivered independently to a central polling place and counted (electronically).

The system doesn't include a voter-verifiable receipt, and the designers admit that this needs to be added. The receipt is a printout from the machine, without which there is no paper audit trail of the vote, which is necessary to assure voters that their vote got counted, as well as being needed in case of a recount. But that's easy enough to add, and New Jersey Congressman Rush Holt has introduced a bill in the U.S. House that would make such receipts mandatory in all American e-voting systems.

*snip*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Skink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-05 09:50 PM
Response to Original message
1. To easy. NEXT...
What are you trying to pull.:mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Syrinx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-05 10:10 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I beg your pardon
Edited on Fri Jun-24-05 10:29 PM by Syrinx
:shrug:

Sir, or madam, I honestly have no idea what you are talking about. I asked a simple question about a voting system that I read about in a magazine. If you have no reply except for an uncalled-for bit of rudeness, why do you feel compelled to reply at all?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-05 10:44 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I haven't quite got the Sarcasm down.
Sorry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Syrinx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-05 11:12 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. oh, my bad
That mean looking smilie fooled me I guess. Sorry for not getting it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-25-05 01:08 AM
Response to Original message
5. It isn't actually in use.
According to an Australian correspondent on one of my other lists, they still use hand-marked paper ballots. The system you are talking about must have been some kind of feasibility study.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Syrinx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-25-05 01:36 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. thanks for the report
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC