Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Framing the Election Privatization Debate

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
Bill Bored Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-05 11:12 AM
Original message
Framing the Election Privatization Debate
I was thinking that we need some language to describe the DRE vendors and their shills in Congress, BoEs, and elsewhere that everyone can understand in a sound bite.

I think from now on, we should refer to anyone who sells DREs, supports them or harbors them as "Election Privatization Advocates" or members of the "Election Privatization Movement" or the "Election Privatization Community", etc.

You can make up some more of these, but the point is to show that they are NOT in favor of publicly run, verifiable elections, whether they admit this or not.

We on the other hand are the Pro-Democracy Movement!

If anyone can think of some more like this, please post them here, but more importantly, USE THEM in your everyday conversations with friends, the media, elected officials, etc.

And we should make no distinction between DRE vendors and those who harbor them -- they are either with us or against us!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
adolfo Donating Member (525 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-05 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
1. True
We should make a list of the individuals/organizations that are for Election Privatization and follow the money trail. There could be some interesting results.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
autorank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-05 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
2. Slight variation


DRE hawkers: Privatized Election Advocates

The whole process: Outsourced elections e.g.

They've outsourced our elections.

What do you expect when elections are outsorced to the private sector.

Or if its Sequoia: They've oursourced our electoins to England, which won't even use voting machines.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bill Bored Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-05 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. It's Venezuela now, but let's not have that debate again! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
autorank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-05 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. I'm happy it is. Give me a source. I couldn't find it on their web page.
In fact Venezuela is much better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bill Bored Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-05 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #6
16. Here's a link
Sorry, I thought I posted this before. This is from the Venezuelan opposition, but it's pretty good:

<http://www.venered.org/english/?id=61>

-snip-

Implications

It is extremely worrying indeed that a company with connections to the Hugo Chavez regime has been selected to run elections in a county of Chicago and given carte blanche to operate in the USA and other countries. Equally preoccupying is the fact that leading players of the global financial market are related to Smartmatic and to some extent to Fidel Castro`s heir.

-snip-
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
autorank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-15-05 02:32 AM
Response to Reply #16
25. You turkey, you should have posted that. It's great. Stranger and
stranger. This is thoroughly bizarre. How the Hell does this happen without the slightest notice here. Holy shit!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bill Bored Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-05 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Privatized Election Advocates is a bit ambiguous
Edited on Fri Oct-14-05 12:01 PM by Bill Bored
and sounds like only the advocates are privatized. It's the elections that we want to call attention to.

I like Election Privatization better for this reason.

Outsourced Elections is OK, but I think in light of Bush's resounding success with Social Security Privatization, we might get more mileage out of Privatization at this point.

If you want to say something like Off-Shore Privatization, referring to Sequoia, go for it! It's the "best" of both worlds!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-05 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
5. RECOMMENDED! There is NOTHING more important than the American...
...people learning about who is 'counting' their votes and how.

Two far right-wing Bushite corporations tabulated 80% of the votes in the 2004 election, using SECRET, PROPRIETARY programming code.

You almost don't need to know anything else. (But there is so much more...).

My meme about DREs (touchscreens) is that they are ELECTION THEFT MACHINES. There can be no other purpose for a voting machine run on secret, proprietary programming code, whose manufacturers claim does not need a "paper trail," and who lobby against a "paper trail" (let alone a real paper ballot).

But it isn't just the touchscreens. It's also the central tabulators. All, all has been withdrawn behind a "Wizard of Oz" curtain of secrecy.

Bill, I'm not sure what you meant about Venezuela, but Venezuela has OPEN SOURCE CODE (that is, anyone may review how the votes are being tabulated), as opposed to the U.S., with SECRET code.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bill Bored Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-05 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. I meant that Sequoia is owned by a Venezuelan co.
The Brits sold it to them but not all of their web pages have been updated to reflect this change.

Thanks for the recommendation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ellipsis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-05 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. nominated./nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-05 10:32 PM
Response to Reply #5
23. (Learning)When you scan your ballot
do you know how its being counted, do you know how its being tabulated if you don't its because big business is counting your vote in SECRET.

All you have to do is demand that your government do something about it NOW.

The safest and most secure way is for "We The People" To Count our votes by hand.

Germany,France,Italy and Canada count their votes by hand.

U.K. recently banned all electronic voting equipment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kip Humphrey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-05 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
8. Corporate takeover of public elections; Corporatization of our elections
The "Election Corporatization Movement":

They've taken our farms,
They've taking our schools,
They're corporatizing our public highways,
They own our hospitals and manage our doctors,
They've invaded our military,
They own our prisons,
They manage our public lands,
They now can take our homes.

Now, they are stealing our elections!

Our votes are being corporatized by secretly counting hidden digital ballots derived and interpreted from voters' input via corporate digital vote processing systems running proprietary, trade-secret software.

With centralized corporate control of exit polls which can now easily be compromised or discounted by the elimination of competition and the scientific application of corporate public relations;

With unaudited and unauditable vote results announced by a corporate media hegemony of private special interests,

The citizenry have lost all transparency to their elections with no assurance their intent is reflected in electronic election outcomes.

Corporatization of our public commons is tantamount to nazism: that which the "Greatest Generation" sacrificed to eliminate from our planet.

Corporatization of the public vote strips away all citizen control of our government, replacing the voice of the people with corporate control by private interests and secret intent.

We are now on the verge of a neo-nazi 1,000 year 4th Reich and it up to us to stop it. Corporatizing the public vote enables and ensures private, secret control of our election results. Without transparent elections and with no assurance the will of the people has been heard, received, and expressed, our democracy is in grave jeopardy.

Therefore, it is incumbent on "We The People" to heed the warnings of history and step up to protect our votes and our democracy before it is too late. If we do not demand a return to citizen controlled and supervised, transparent, public elections, we will lose our democracy to the secret determinations of the corporate boardroom.

Its up to us.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Melissa G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-05 09:40 PM
Response to Reply #8
22. Excellent post Kip! How about Hostile Corporate Takeover of
Edited on Fri Oct-14-05 09:43 PM by Melissa G
Our Elections??? All happening with complicit Media Silence on the issue where too many folks don't even know it's happening!!!!

Edit to say you really nailed it Kip, it's really hostile corporate takeover of our whole country and massive looting of the treasury while they are at it!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yowzayowzayowza Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-15-05 12:40 AM
Response to Reply #8
24. Unfortunately, "they" are...
a whole heap of "We the People" in the form of fat, happy & stupid stock holders. Nice rant... I'm reminded of Thomas Jefferson:

"I hope we shall crush in its birth the aristocracy of our moneyed corporations which dare already to challenge our government to a trial of strength and bid defiance to the laws of our country."

The kudzu has over-run the garden and a machete tain't gunna clean it up. Our polity is increasingly "engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy: that is the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness."(John Kenneth Galbraith)

Despite the promise of our Constitution, we have yet to construct a civilization out of materials beyond charity and avarice. Sorry, don't have much positive to add... Perhaps this from here might suffice. Tho these types of things are incrementally effective, I'm afraid itz gunna take a "significant emotional event" like the Depression to shock "We the People" back into focus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Time for change Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-05 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
9. That sounds very good, but how about
"Election Privatization Advocates for the secret counting of votes", or something like that. Privatization of elections is bad enough, but maybe some people wouldn't get the point that this involves counting our votes in secret.

Recommended.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bill Bored Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-05 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. Right, but I was thinking of something that could be used even
in the middle of a casual conversation or a debate, over and over again.

We can't just say that a guy like Chris Dodd favors DREs. We need to say that by doing so, he is supporting "election privatization." That's really the first step to a legal ban on this crap.

Otherwise, we will be told that disabled voters need DREs, and every other excuse in the book.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
diva77 Donating Member (999 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-05 04:36 PM
Response to Original message
11. Why use the term "election" -- election, according to Funk & Wagnalls, is
"a popular vote upon any question officially proposed" -- if the popular vote has been removed, what's left?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
diva77 Donating Member (999 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-05 04:39 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. we've gone from "popular elections" to "privatized selections!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
diva77 Donating Member (999 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-05 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. or "corporate coups"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CrispyQ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-05 05:50 PM
Response to Reply #12
18. I like it!!
And welcome to DU, diva77!

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bill Bored Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-05 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. OK good point -- it's an oxymoron. But it is what it is.
You can make this point as you continue the conversation, morphing election into selection.

Welcome to DU!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
recoveringdittohed Donating Member (463 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-05 05:32 PM
Response to Original message
17. Faith Based Elections
With no paper trail you just have to "have faith" that the results are legitimate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CrispyQ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-05 05:52 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. That's a good one too!
Love your user name! :rofl:


Welcome to DU! :hi:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fly by night Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-05 06:35 PM
Response to Original message
20. Private companies counting our votes in secret ...
... with software we're not allowed to examine.

That may be a bit wordy but it makes the point with words that are not difficult to understand with most audiences (unlike "privatization" or "corporatization".)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SmileMaker Donating Member (346 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-05 09:33 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. Exit poll companies have conflicts of interest too
The data that is collected by a consortium of private media corporations is kept secret too. I'm trying to frame some good languare for an exit poll project for NJ (Gov).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 06:29 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC