Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Diebolding North Carolina

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
WillYourVoteBCounted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-05-05 09:05 PM
Original message
Diebolding North Carolina
DIEBOLD EMPLOYEE (FROM 2002-2005) TO OVERSEE NC'S VOTING MACHINE RFP

The Project manager for North Carolina's RFP process(Keith Long) also is/was a senior employee of Diebold from 2002-2005.

Diebold is already gaining advantage over other vendors in other ways - Diebold has been given permission by the courts to submit their proposal on Monday, 11-7 which is 3 days after the deadline for all other vendors.

Mr. Keith Long oversaw the installation of 22,000 Diebold voting machines in Georgia and 5,000 in Maryland.

One might wonder if Diebold has unfair advantages over other vendors in North Carolina.

North Carolina's Request for Proposal Guidelines here:
http://www.ips.state.nc.us/ips/AGENCY/PDF/04454100.pdf
_______________________________________________________________

The State selected Keith Long to be the Project Manager overseeing the RFP Process:

The State Board of Elections issued a statement of work through the Information Technology Services Supplemental Staffing Convenience Contract (STF-002619) for the purpose of selecting a project manager for the State's selection of voting equipment pursuant to the passage of SB 223. Mr. Keith Long of Beachwood Computing, LTD., was selected from over 20 applicants responding to the public posting. State Board staff and ITS staff were in agreement that Mr. Long was the candidate most qualified to provide the services described in the statement of work.

Bob Rauf
IT Director
North Carolina State Board of Elections
' 919-715-1651
, bob.rauf@ncmail.net
_________________________________________________

Resume for Keith Long, who is the project manager overseeing NC's

Request for Proposal (requirements that voting machine companies have to meet)

Excerpt of Mr. Long's resume:

Diebold Election Systems, Inc. McKinney, TX
Senior Project Manager 2002 to 2005

Directed a 60 million dollar project to successfully install 22,000 electronic voting machines in the State of Georgia on time and under budget.

Project lead to install 5,000 electronic voting machines in the State of Maryland.

Supervised the installation of a new Voter Registration System in Cuyahoga County (Cleveland), Ohio.

Planned and directed the statewide election results upload to the Georgia Secretary of State website.

Managed the design and testing of new optical scan voting system.
*rest of resume here: http://pmpplus.com/
_______________________________________________________________

November 4, 2005 vendors must have their proposals turned in.
_______________________________________________________________

Diebold asks for and gets permission to turn in their proposal 3 days after deadline for other

vendors:

November 4, 2005 at 1:45PM, Diebold requested and obtained a temporary restraining order against the SBOE and the NC Office of Information and Technology Services.

The restraining order extended the deadline for submission of sealed bids to Diebold until 12:30 PM on Monday, November 7, 2005.
__________________________________________________

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Spiffarino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-05-05 09:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. Have you put this in the NC forum?
Time for us to light another fire under the weenies in Raleigh.

:nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillYourVoteBCounted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-05-05 09:25 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Diebold gets to submit bid 3 days AFTER everyone else?
Diebold waits until the day the proposal on voting systems is due,
Nov 4, and files a temp restraining order, (court grants it)
and is allowed to submit their proposal 3 days after
all other vendors have turned in their proposal.

The court order only states that sufficent cause has been shown.

AGH
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Benhurst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-05-05 10:05 PM
Response to Original message
3. Recommended NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhiteTara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-06-05 01:28 AM
Response to Original message
4. oh, sh*t! Here we go again n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texpatriot2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-06-05 02:08 AM
Response to Original message
5. Live FREE or Diebold.n.t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
philb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-06-05 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
6. Touch screen switching and other problems in North Carolina in 2004
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 08:59 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC