|
I'm asking this question because I don't know the legal answer, and I think it's a very important question to consider.
In Congressman John Conyers' House Judiciary Committee Democratic Staff report, entitled "Preserving Democracy: What Went Wrong in Ohio", numerous irregularities involving the 2004 Ohio Presidential Election (pre-election, during the election, and post-election) are identified and discussed. Most DUers, and perhaps most Americans who are aware of the report, believe that the allegations contained in it are serious and cast considerable doubt on the integrity of the Ohio election. Yet, Kenneth Blackwell, the Ohio Secretary of State who was responsible for the running of the election, has refused to answer any of the many questions posed to him by Conyers' Committee.
Recently, in response to a thread that I posted that involves the integrity of the Ohio election, another DUer (who I won't identify because this was a private conversation - but I can tell you that he wasn't a friend of mine) told me that Blackwell was correct not to answer the Conyers Committee's questions because Conyers has no legal jurisdiction in the matter. I didn't know how to answer him because I don't have sufficient legal background.
I would be very interested to know what others think of this.
|